I personally think it is irrelevant if that parody website is funny, fiction or lame to each person here, or with good or bad intention or not, or if one personally got upset or not, as there will be many other persons too who view that information that will get very upset and not know what is true or not, so accept much of that as true, in terms of what that webpage says how one with such a condition thinks, feels and acts.
I am not talking just about persons that may take things literally and believe what they see and hear as always true, but even those who do not know anything about Aspergers could think that was mostly true. Heck, even I, who analyzes everything and understands all language, am left wondering what is true in that sight and not, as they mix some truths in with much fiction.
So, in reality, although some persons can laugh at that stuff, I am thinking, "What is really so funny about it?" if many persons here or in society viewing that would have a worse image of either themselves or those with Aspergers after reading it? What next? More bullying, more stereotyping, more criticisms, and more rejections from others? And more self-hatred?
Like it or not, even many of the nicest, most caring and wisest of persons will not be able to get some of that distorted untrue imagery, generalizations and the fiction parts out of their head. So, my recommendation is for persons here not to dismiss the harm of that information, as it does belittle those with Aspergers regardless of truth, and it may seem insensitive to those here that are offended by such, regardless of that website authors intention. I thought many on the Spectrum prided themselves on the facts and the truth, as it was a part of their makeup, and being different than NTs like that? Well, why support those lies and laugh it off then?
Riley maybe thought that was largely the truth about Aspergers, from reading those or other distortions in life, so to her maybe that monster statement was because of believing all the lies, not really a critique at any here or really how she could have earlier felt. That proves the harm of such sites. I was offended and I may not even have ASD. How many others here or elsewhere could too feel worse, or others then without Aspergers want to hate or generalize more, after reading such? Yes, the words "Encyclopedia Dramatica" tells most persons that fiction is to follow, and lots of the content too obviously shows humor attempt, but do not assume everyone with conditions or without conditions sees that humor and can separate the truth and fiction. Entertainment is more important than harming someone, just for a laugh?
In my opinion, put the blame where it belongs: on the sick person(s) who create those webpages. If one wants humor when involving anyone with a condition, at most poke fun about them privately if need be, but to the masses? Or better yet, poke fun at themselves. Use humor in other ways. Make fun of some fruit, or whatever. No need to in a public poke fun at a group of persons to elevate themselves or the rest. And again, I feel it is not even relevant if one was not offended reading that webpage. For instance, let's say someone was abused. Should we say that abuse from the perpetrator is ok then, if the victim did not see it as abuse? So, what is the difference?
Stereotyping, based on race, condition, age, gender, etc., whether using humor and some truths or not, is improper, as there are many who will not fit that stereotype. Of course some persons cannot help but do so, if they have a genetic or neurological condition that makes that needed, but for those others who do it either for laughs, to build themselves up, or cause more prejudice, discrimination and hatred, stop complaining then when they too get bullied, criticized or rejected in life one day from that supposedly innocent humor from sarcasm, lies and stereotyping. They should find or create their entertainment elsewhere, and put those few minutes of time instead of laughing at those with conditions, but helping someone with that condition instead.