Two of our kids have been recently diagnosed as ASD 2, though I would suggest tending towards 1 for both of them. The road to that was long. We've already had a few different experts helping on bits and pieces in the past, but now we have the diagnoses we're looking to make things more structured. The problem we're having is that our experience with most therapies to-date is that they have been pretty much useless. I'm not sure if we've had bad luck with the therapists themselves, or it's the actual disciplines, but a lot of it is coming across as basically a sham. We had a decent speech path who was honest and said when she reached as far as she felt was useful, but the rest have been wholly unimpressive. OT has been the worst, and costs an eye-watering amount just to have an enthusiastic graduate throwing a ball and asking them to play with toys. They all seem to be unable to keep to their speciality and opine on different areas and it's difficult to actually see any improvement whatsoever. Does OT ever do anything useful? It almost feels like we've ventured into the realm of pop-psychology and alternative healing.
Our attitude to our kids is that they don't need to be "fixed" but if they are able to pick up skills that will help them - either as alternatives to skills that come naturally to peers or by achieving some sort of parity through a little extra effort - then that's all good. But the vibe we're getting is that the specialists are going through the motions of everything they learned in an evening course and have been dying to try out on a warm-blooded doll, and abjectly failing at achieving anything at all. I'm actually questioning if the whole premise of this sort of specialist help is flawed and that we're both wasting money and doing our kids a disservice. Part of me wonders if we shouldn't just reject the whole lot.
Does anyone here have any experiences they could share? We want to make the right decisions, but despite this being conventional wisdom and pushed by their paediatrician, something doesn't feel right.
Our attitude to our kids is that they don't need to be "fixed" but if they are able to pick up skills that will help them - either as alternatives to skills that come naturally to peers or by achieving some sort of parity through a little extra effort - then that's all good. But the vibe we're getting is that the specialists are going through the motions of everything they learned in an evening course and have been dying to try out on a warm-blooded doll, and abjectly failing at achieving anything at all. I'm actually questioning if the whole premise of this sort of specialist help is flawed and that we're both wasting money and doing our kids a disservice. Part of me wonders if we shouldn't just reject the whole lot.
Does anyone here have any experiences they could share? We want to make the right decisions, but despite this being conventional wisdom and pushed by their paediatrician, something doesn't feel right.