Feeling isolated? You're not alone.
Join 20,000+ people who understand exactly how your day went. Whether you're newly diagnosed, self-identified, or supporting someone you love – this is a space where you don't have to explain yourself.
Join the Conversation → It's free, anonymous, and supportive.
As a member, you'll get:
You've found your people. Create your free account
This is beyond me what consitutes a personality disorder and what doesn't. Something doesn't need to be considered a disorder to be clearly detrimental.Strange thread, one of my brothers has a undergraduate in psychology. told me years ago sociopaths do not care about others. If the OP is being up front they may not be a sociopath definitely not one of us. Troll?
Trolling is antisocial entertainment tooIf he is ASPD taunting him will be water off a ducks back. If he isn't a sociopath (started posting 2 weeks ago) then it's just entertainment.
As I said, consequences may change anti-social activity.Maybe you should try to torment someone that can fight back. Instead of small animals and children. Getting punched in the face can change people. You sound like a sadistic coward. Can you imagine what would happen if you found a big guy and tried to torment him. It could be good for you, maybe you learn something. Maybe you'll learn how it feels and that it's not fun.
Objective analysis is my preferred response to anti-social exhibitionism.What reaction do you want from us? Revulsion? Disgust? Fear and loathing? You need psychiatric help. For starters, look at WHY you do those cruel things and WHY you came here to tell everyone about it.
The individual has only himself to blame for some doubting his genuineness, IMO.If he is ASPD taunting him will be water off a ducks back. If he isn't a sociopath (started posting 2 weeks ago) then it's just entertainment.
You can be upfront and still have ASPD.Strange thread, one of my brothers has a undergraduate in psychology. told me years ago sociopaths do not care about others. If the OP is being up front they may not be a sociopath definitely not one of us. Troll?
Yes, a person can be both autistic and a sociopath, but the combination is uncommon, complex, and often misunderstood. Because this touches on mental‑health conditions, it’s important to keep in mind that only a qualified clinician can diagnose either condition, and anyone with concerns should speak with a professional.
Agreed......I think this is attention seeking behavior of the OP. They said they like evoking strong emotional upset reactions in people. This thread has definitely obliged in that department.Trolling is antisocial entertainment too
And either way - true, that given the descriptions, evoking strong responses might be deliberate and entertainment for the OP.
Objective analysis is my preferred response to anti-social exhibitionism.
The more damaged the individual, the more "interesting".
Emotions have no place in me when confronting defined situations such as this, for a couple of reasons.![]()
Yeah, insanity will not be any defense from what they said, as they are admitting they are doing something they feel as wrong and that they know that society feels as wrong.People like OP do know that their tricks won't work on anyone who isn't kind, small or defenseless, exactly why he was using only kids, animals and already tormented women. It was his choice, he knows what he is doing, and he knows that what he is doing is bad. His (and other people's) problem is that he chooses to hurt others instead of doing smth else. He will one day be punished for that, if he doesn't seek help to control that.
He really needs to seek professional help.I don't think the OP is looking for "objective analysis" from us.
Perhaps my comment before should have been more clear. It was not intended to harm the OP or accuse them of trolling. Quite the reverse. The OP clearly stated that they get off on seeing the evidence of people's reactions to their words/ actions that are emotionally upsetting. All of the upset reactions, speculations and arguments here in this thread are just feeding into the OP's self-stated psychosis...and not really helping the OP at all with their request for help with sadism. My comment was also for the benefit of the people who are getting upset reading the thread...that they should take it all with a grain of salt, as it may have been intended to invoke a reaction. The OP has already heard all the helpful answers this site can give them, that they need professional help. The best thing we can do to truly help them with this going forward is to stop feeding into their triggering content.It makes little difference to the response whether OP is trolling or not, so why even discuss it?
The serious answers to OP all say the same thing:
* This is way outside AF's collective "pay grade"
* Get professional help as soon as possible.
A meta-discussions has clear downsides, and no upsides:
1. Telling an honest actor they're a troll is harmful, and may well induce a negative outcome
2. Telling a troll they're trolling in the hope that they'll stop is a fool's errand.
If I reversed the logic of the meta-discussion, my conclusion would be that it's intended to harm to OP.
There's even supporting evidence for it:
OP has been targeted by something that looks a lot like a small-scale "struggle session".
But why tho?
That kind of engagement is purely for the amusement of the "attackers", with motivations that are oddly reminiscent of the original post.
almost feels as if , am being baited for a certain type of response