• Feeling isolated? You're not alone.

    Join 20,000+ people who understand exactly how your day went. Whether you're newly diagnosed, self-identified, or supporting someone you love – this is a space where you don't have to explain yourself.

    Join the Conversation → It's free, anonymous, and supportive.

    As a member, you'll get:

    • A community that actually gets it – no judgment, no explanations needed
    • Private forums for sensitive topics (hidden from search engines)
    • Real-time chat with others who share your experiences
    • Your own blog to document your journey

    You've found your people. Create your free account

Sadism: help please!

Strange thread, one of my brothers has a undergraduate in psychology. told me years ago sociopaths do not care about others. If the OP is being up front they may not be a sociopath definitely not one of us. Troll?
This is beyond me what consitutes a personality disorder and what doesn't. Something doesn't need to be considered a disorder to be clearly detrimental.

If he is ASPD taunting him will be water off a ducks back. If he isn't a sociopath (started posting 2 weeks ago) then it's just entertainment.
Trolling is antisocial entertainment too

And either way - true, that given the descriptions, evoking strong responses might be deliberate and entertainment for the OP.
 
Maybe you should try to torment someone that can fight back. Instead of small animals and children. Getting punched in the face can change people. You sound like a sadistic coward. Can you imagine what would happen if you found a big guy and tried to torment him. It could be good for you, maybe you learn something. Maybe you'll learn how it feels and that it's not fun.
As I said, consequences may change anti-social activity.
 
What reaction do you want from us? Revulsion? Disgust? Fear and loathing? You need psychiatric help. For starters, look at WHY you do those cruel things and WHY you came here to tell everyone about it.
Objective analysis is my preferred response to anti-social exhibitionism.
The more damaged the individual, the more "interesting".
Emotions have no place in me when confronting defined situations such as this, for a couple of reasons. :cool:
 
If he is ASPD taunting him will be water off a ducks back. If he isn't a sociopath (started posting 2 weeks ago) then it's just entertainment.
The individual has only himself to blame for some doubting his genuineness, IMO.
But "doubting" is not the same as condemning.

The best thing to do in situations like this, IMO, is to remain objective and analytical rather than emotional.
But I am repeating myself.
I do enjoy the sound of my own voice after all, so ppl will have to deal with that. 😛
 
Strange thread, one of my brothers has a undergraduate in psychology. told me years ago sociopaths do not care about others. If the OP is being up front they may not be a sociopath definitely not one of us. Troll?
You can be upfront and still have ASPD.

Yes, a person can be both autistic and a sociopath, but the combination is uncommon, complex, and often misunderstood. Because this touches on mental‑health conditions, it’s important to keep in mind that only a qualified clinician can diagnose either condition, and anyone with concerns should speak with a professional.

How autism and sociopathy differ​

Autism and sociopathy (more formally antisocial personality disorder, ASPD) come from very different origins and involve very different traits.

Autism (ASD)​

  • A neurodevelopmental condition present from early childhood
  • Characterised by differences in social communication, sensory processing, and routines
  • Empathy differences are usually about cognitive empathy (difficulty reading social cues), not lack of caring
  • Many autistic people have strong moral codes and deep concern for fairness

Sociopathy / ASPD​

  • A personality disorder involving persistent disregard for others’ rights
  • Marked by manipulation, deceit, aggression, and lack of remorse
  • Empathy differences are usually about affective empathy (reduced emotional response to others’ suffering)
  • Behavioural patterns must begin in childhood (conduct disorder)
These are not opposite conditions, but they are not similar either.

Can they co‑occur?​

Yes — but it is rare and often complicated to diagnose. Research shows that:

  • Autism can co‑occur with personality disorders, including ASPD, in a minority of cases.
  • Forensic studies show some individuals with ASD also meet criteria for ASPD, though this is not the norm.
  • Overlap is often due to misinterpretation of autistic traits (e.g., bluntness, social difficulty) as antisocial behaviour, even when intent is not malicious.
One review found that autistic individuals in forensic settings sometimes have comorbid personality disorders, including ASPD, but this is not evidence that autism causes antisocial traits.

Why the combination is often misunderstood​

Some behaviours can look similar on the surface but come from very different causes:

  • An autistic person may seem blunt because they struggle with social nuance.
  • A sociopathic person may seem charming or blunt because they are manipulating or disregarding others.
Intent is the key difference:

  • Autistic traits come from neurological differences, not malice.
  • Sociopathic traits involve intentional violation of others’ rights.
This is why clinicians must be careful not to confuse the two.

From memory, the very first post screamed "Toll" to me, but I am not the sort of person who mindlessly jumps to conclusions.

BTW, trolls can very easily be sociopaths/psychopaths, IMO.
 
Seen this in individuals before . After reading what you wrote. Not really willing to engage in being judgemental of you after what you,wrote , almost feels as if , am being baited for a certain type of response , possibly to help satisfy some urge ,you may or maynot have ?
But quite honesty all things considered if ,you think to try improvement for yourself of somekind . Would join the Marine Corp . If you are serious about change. Believe it may help you . Be the best you can be or die trying , And tickle your saviour issue at the same time. imho
 
Trolling is antisocial entertainment too

And either way - true, that given the descriptions, evoking strong responses might be deliberate and entertainment for the OP.
Agreed......I think this is attention seeking behavior of the OP. They said they like evoking strong emotional upset reactions in people. This thread has definitely obliged in that department.
 
Last edited:
It makes little difference to the response whether OP is trolling or not, so why even discuss it?

The serious answers to OP all say the same thing:
* This is way outside AF's collective "pay grade"
* Get professional help as soon as possible.

A meta-discussions has clear downsides, and no upsides:
1. Telling an honest actor they're a troll is harmful, and may well induce a negative outcome
2. Telling a troll they're trolling in the hope that they'll stop is a fool's errand.

If I reversed the logic of the meta-discussion, my conclusion would be that it's intended to harm to OP.
There's even supporting evidence for it:
OP has been targeted by something that looks a lot like a small-scale "struggle session".

But why tho?

That kind of engagement is purely for the amusement of the "attackers", with motivations that are oddly reminiscent of the original post.
 
Objective analysis is my preferred response to anti-social exhibitionism.
The more damaged the individual, the more "interesting".
Emotions have no place in me when confronting defined situations such as this, for a couple of reasons. :cool:

I don't think the OP is looking for "objective analysis" from us.
 
People like OP do know that their tricks won't work on anyone who isn't kind, small or defenseless, exactly why he was using only kids, animals and already tormented women. It was his choice, he knows what he is doing, and he knows that what he is doing is bad. His (and other people's) problem is that he chooses to hurt others instead of doing smth else. He will one day be punished for that, if he doesn't seek help to control that.
Yeah, insanity will not be any defense from what they said, as they are admitting they are doing something they feel as wrong and that they know that society feels as wrong.

Those who think they can do whatever horrible things they want for their own thrills and act like victims who should not be punished legally clearly are sinister, apathetic and self-absorbed people.

Maybe they need to feel their own pain, by being put in a prison with similar monsters who will do the same to them. That seems like the only possible way to get justice served, and for them to feel any ounce of remorse for those harmed.
 
It makes little difference to the response whether OP is trolling or not, so why even discuss it?

The serious answers to OP all say the same thing:
* This is way outside AF's collective "pay grade"
* Get professional help as soon as possible.

A meta-discussions has clear downsides, and no upsides:
1. Telling an honest actor they're a troll is harmful, and may well induce a negative outcome
2. Telling a troll they're trolling in the hope that they'll stop is a fool's errand.

If I reversed the logic of the meta-discussion, my conclusion would be that it's intended to harm to OP.
There's even supporting evidence for it:
OP has been targeted by something that looks a lot like a small-scale "struggle session".

But why tho?

That kind of engagement is purely for the amusement of the "attackers", with motivations that are oddly reminiscent of the original post.
Perhaps my comment before should have been more clear. It was not intended to harm the OP or accuse them of trolling. Quite the reverse. The OP clearly stated that they get off on seeing the evidence of people's reactions to their words/ actions that are emotionally upsetting. All of the upset reactions, speculations and arguments here in this thread are just feeding into the OP's self-stated psychosis...and not really helping the OP at all with their request for help with sadism. My comment was also for the benefit of the people who are getting upset reading the thread...that they should take it all with a grain of salt, as it may have been intended to invoke a reaction. The OP has already heard all the helpful answers this site can give them, that they need professional help. The best thing we can do to truly help them with this going forward is to stop feeding into their triggering content.
 
@MC1Rcat

Thanks for the update. It seems we were trying to achieve similar objectives, and used different styles of indirection. Also FWIW I wasn't responding specifically to your post, but I wanted to be after one that didn't include any high-temperature personal attacks.

I agree with your the "grain of salt" comment. And I think it applies in both cases.

* Some trolls are looking for maximum shock value, and go "all in". So it's bad behavior by unpleasant people.
* But how can a normie accurately interpret the communication style of the "call for help" case?
I certainly can't understand how such a person thinks, and what they would see as suitable information.
 

New Threads

Top Bottom