• Feeling isolated? You're not alone.

    Join 20,000+ people who understand exactly how your day went. Whether you're newly diagnosed, self-identified, or supporting someone you love – this is a space where you don't have to explain yourself.

    Join the Conversation → It's free, anonymous, and supportive.

    As a member, you'll get:

    • A community that actually gets it – no judgment, no explanations needed
    • Private forums for sensitive topics (hidden from search engines)
    • Real-time chat with others who share your experiences
    • Your own blog to document your journey

    You've found your people. Create your free account

Statistics: Covid & Vaccines

Status
Not open for further replies.
No vaccine is 100 %, better then taking a chance, I contracted Transverse Myelitis 50 years ago, bit of a coincident a couple of days after a Polio vaccine. did not stop me from getting vaccinated for Covid-19.
 
  1. Interesting, virtually all deaths happened during the Christmas season, not during Easter vaccines? bifrucation no longer an issue in Ontario case results
 

Attachments

Last edited:
May be people get deterred because they go to web sites that have evidence that is not peer reviewed or follows proper journalistic guidelines, they would learn if they had went to higher education and become a proper journalists with ethics.

T.V. is all about how can they make the story sound more urgent, most talking heads are not journalists
 
Last edited:
Ronald Zeeman said:
May be people get deterred because they go to web sites that have evidence that is not peer reviewed or follows proper journalistic guidelines, they would learn if they had went to higher education and become a proper journalists with ethics.

T.V. is all about how can they make the story sound more urgent, most talking heads are not journalists
Click to expand...

I couldn't resist commenting. When I read your post above, Ronald, I had to laugh.

"Proper journalistic guidelines", "proper journalist with ethics"... < Those things have been almost entirely absent from "journalism" for quite a few years now. There's a valid reason that "journalism" is so distrusted. I agree with you that most talking heads are not journalists. Most "journalism" is no longer journalism, it's propaganda. That's why I laughed.

Propaganda: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
 
Keep in mind I am an older guy read the paper every day Mary Tyler Moore show was funny, now is the Paradigm. I actually check the credentials of people I watch.
 
A quick reminder that LifeSite News is not credible--For a site founded by the pro-life movement, it sure does push a lot of misinformation that could get folks killed.
 
Aspergers_Aspie said:
Why are the authorities not taking it down then
Click to expand...

If "authorities" took down websites with misinformation ("conservative"/"right" and "liberal"/"left" are both guilty of this) the number would likely be quite staggering.

I'm always suspect of websites that are labeled as uncredible, but I try to look at the info itself in respect to its validity. I know there are others where, even if there is factual data reported on a website they consider to be unreputable, they will refuse to believe the data simply because of the website. In other words, disbelieving the information itself (even if factual and true) because of who the messenger is. Not good in my opinion.

Case in point: Calling Ivermectin fit for human consumption and prescribed by physicians to humans, "horse dewormer" is literally no different than calling Amoxicillin, an antibiotic prescribed to humans "dog medicine" because it also happens to be prescribed to dogs. Does everyone see that? This blatant tactic warrants everyone to question it on its face.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

New Threads

Top Bottom