Statistics: Covid & Vaccines

[Ronald Zeeman]

Only works if you take it.

 

[Dadamen]

Only works if you take it.

I and my whole family took it, so it will work.

 

[Ronald Zeeman]

No vaccine is 100 %, better then taking a chance, I contracted Transverse Myelitis 50 years ago, bit of a coincident a couple of days after a Polio vaccine. did not stop me from getting vaccinated for Covid-19.

 

[Ronald Zeeman]

Deaths in Ontario and some other data.

 

[Aspergers_Aspie]

So before a covid vaccine someone could play sports but after someone can't?:-
Doctors advise against intensive sport after Covid vaccination

 

[Ronald Zeeman]

Thar's why I stay away from silly web sites. prefer to read reputable sources, for my information.

 

[Ronald Zeeman]

1. Interesting, virtually all deaths happened during the Christmas season, not during Easter vaccines? bifrucation no longer an issue in Ontario case results

 

[Aspergers_Aspie]

Maybe some people will be deterred to receive the vaccine when they see stories like this his one
Over 100 Ontario youth suffer heart inflammation following COVID-19 jab, report says - LifeSite

 

[Ronald Zeeman]

May be people get deterred because they go to web sites that have evidence that is not peer reviewed or follows proper journalistic guidelines, they would learn if they had went to higher education and become a proper journalists with ethics.

T.V. is all about how can they make the story sound more urgent, most talking heads are not journalists

 

[Magna]

May be people get deterred because they go to web sites that have evidence that is not peer reviewed or follows proper journalistic guidelines, they would learn if they had went to higher education and become a proper journalists with ethics.

T.V. is all about how can they make the story sound more urgent, most talking heads are not journalists

I couldn't resist commenting. When I read your post above, Ronald, I had to laugh.

"Proper journalistic guidelines", "proper journalist with ethics"... < Those things have been almost entirely absent from "journalism" for quite a few years now. There's a valid reason that "journalism" is so distrusted. I agree with you that most talking heads are not journalists. Most "journalism" is no longer journalism, it's propaganda. That's why I laughed.

Propaganda: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.

 

[Ronald Zeeman]

Keep in mind I am an older guy read the paper every day Mary Tyler Moore show was funny, now is the Paradigm. I actually check the credentials of people I watch.

 

[Ronald Zeeman]

Looks like we survived labor day no issues. Ontario is doing well. people getting shots. no one wants to put thier kids at risk. Now to get through our thanks giving OCT 11.

 

[Aspergers_Aspie]

Frontline emergency personnel fighting against COVID-19 injection mandates, firefighters and law enforcement officers in Oregon have banded together to sue the governor for requiring state employees to get the jab:-
Oregon law enforcement officers and firefighters sue governor, state over vaccine mandate - LifeSite

 

[Gerontius]

A quick reminder that LifeSite News is not credible--For a site founded by the pro-life movement, it sure does push a lot of misinformation that could get folks killed.

 

[Aspergers_Aspie]

A quick reminder that LifeSite News is not credible--For a site founded by the pro-life movement, it sure does push a lot of misinformation that could get folks killed.

Why are the authorities not taking it down then

 

[Magna]

Why are the authorities not taking it down then

If "authorities" took down websites with misinformation ("conservative"/"right" and "liberal"/"left" are both guilty of this) the number would likely be quite staggering.

I'm always suspect of websites that are labeled as uncredible, but I try to look at the info itself in respect to its validity. I know there are others where, even if there is factual data reported on a website they consider to be unreputable, they will refuse to believe the data simply because of the website. In other words, disbelieving the information itself (even if factual and true) because of who the messenger is. Not good in my opinion.

Case in point: Calling Ivermectin fit for human consumption and prescribed by physicians to humans, "horse dewormer" is literally no different than calling Amoxicillin, an antibiotic prescribed to humans "dog medicine" because it also happens to be prescribed to dogs. Does everyone see that? This blatant tactic warrants everyone to question it on its face.

 

[Gerontius]

Why are the authorities not taking it down then

Because it's not illegal to spout B.S.
Your argument here is another way to phrase "but it's on the Internet, so it's true."

 

[Aspergers_Aspie]

Because it's not illegal to spout B.S.
Your argument here is another way to phrase "but it's on the Internet, so it's true."

I only know something about that website if someone tells me

 

[Ronald Zeeman]

Toronto, had first run failure, death rate slowly going up, Ontario in general still good.

 

[Aspergers_Aspie]

This is a strong opinion and if one person has this view I would expect others too have this view too:-
'Vaccine passports make me even more reluctant to get a Covid jab'