• Feeling isolated? You're not alone.

    Join 20,000+ people who understand exactly how your day went. Whether you're newly diagnosed, self-identified, or supporting someone you love – this is a space where you don't have to explain yourself.

    Join the Conversation → It's free, anonymous, and supportive.

    As a member, you'll get:

    • A community that actually gets it – no judgment, no explanations needed
    • Private forums for sensitive topics (hidden from search engines)
    • Real-time chat with others who share your experiences
    • Your own blog to document your journey

    You've found your people. Create your free account

Answer a QUESTION with a QUESTION

Can we try kicking a test subject, then compare the after effects to a list of TMJ symptoms?
 
Do you mean the subject covered by the test, or are you referring to the test subjects who are to be subjected to the test?
 
Isn’t just one subject tested in the test, possibly on multiple objects, because if you tried to test multiple subjects at once, you’d be subject to a superfluity of objectives?
 
If the tester is well rounded, wouldn't they know how to filter the superfluity of objectives without feeling the need to fudge the data?
 
How would the past several replies have been different if
anybody had interpreted the word 'sidekick' as a
mis-hearing of the word "psychotic"?
 
It would have to be some sort of picture book, then, if you're just looking, wouldn't it?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

New Threads

Top Bottom