Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral
If there is going to be discussion of video games,
and the discussion is supposed to focus on the undesirability
of particular games, how about detailing the features of them
that take them out of the category of super-fun games?
For instance, a game might be a big fail if>
Examples:
It lacks substance. (It's just a simple linear experience.)
Looks good but lacks playability.
It's more like a movie than a game.
Too much talk, not enough action.
Just a rehash of gameplay style you've seen so many times.
etc.
Detailing specific points would enhance the discussion.
I agree, I remember seeing a gameplay video and demo of the first Watchdogs about a year before release and the video looked absolutely incredible so there was masses of hype, but after the game was finally released after long delays the final game had considerably inferior graphics so many people rightfully felt very ripped off, then the actual game itself wasn't even that enjoyable, it soon got really frustrating, laborious and even quite boring after a while. Overall it was a huge disappointment after seeing the original fake gameplay video which was more what they hoped it would be, rather than what they could really achieve on current hardware at the time on the full version. Watchdogs 2 claimed to improve what had gone wrong on the previous version, but even though it was somewhat better it still wasn't brilliant in my opinion and I now hope they've given up on the franchise for good, it would certainly take a lot to get me interested in a Watchdogs 3 and I wouldn't trust any pre-release gameplay videos or even demos after this.If i can remember a real new franchise that was overhyped and then bashed by the players, i would say watchdogs ( well its just 2 games) , this is when things started to realy go wrong in gaming with the downgrading of the quality of games , i mean the gap between the trailers (that doesnt run on the console most of the time) and the actual game.
Remember that World of Warcraft (WOW) was first released way back in November 2004 followed by numerous expansions. To make people realise how long ago that was in gaming, this was when the original Xbox and Playstation 2 were still the current gen consoles, so WOW was way ahead of it's time. It set a new standard in MMORPGs that many of MMOs copied for years after. Many people loved it or hated it, but even 13.5 years since it's initial release it still has a large following which is in my opinion an incredible achievement even though it is somewhat dated by some MMO standards today despite continuous improvements over the years. For this reason I don't think WOW should be classed as overrated even though it is obviously showing it's age now, although the latest expansions are in my opinion somewhat overrated.WOW and Minecraft come to mind.
I played LOTRO for about a year and I loved it even though graphically it is only average being an old game, it makes up for it in story, gameplay and a massive open world. Best of all the user base is very mature compared to most other MMOs and I became an officer in a kinship (a guild of members) for a while that they took extremely seriously with regularly meetings via Teamspeak (I found voice talking directly difficult however, I find non real time text conversions like forums the easiest and I can just about cope with live text chat after I had a lot of practice).I play lotro which is just about to have its 11th anniversary. It has expanded quite a bit to include just about all of Middle-Earth, but the graphics are about the same as in 2007. And I am still amazed with it. Like I can spend hours riding my horse across it. And all the detail and hidden places I'm still discovering.