Feeling isolated? You're not alone.
Join 20,000+ people who understand exactly how your day went. Whether you're newly diagnosed, self-identified, or supporting someone you love – this is a space where you don't have to explain yourself.
Join the Conversation → It's free, anonymous, and supportive.
As a member, you'll get:
You've found your people. Create your free account
No, actually the original intent was for the count to start over at one where it began.well I guess I wasn't letting anyone else take a turn. Also, nothing in the rules says we have to count by ones.
... so I'm counting by hundreds now.
.
View attachment 107360
oh heck, sorry. I wasn't even watching who posted :-/No, actually the original intent was for the count to start over at one where it began.
This is really just a silly game anyway. No way to really get above three or so.No, actually the original intent was for the count to start over at one where it began.
Kind of shows what kind of attention your staff gives the place if you catch my driftThis is really just a silly game anyway. No way to really get above three or so.
and you altered my first digit. Bold move...