• Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Private Member only forums for more serious discussions that you may wish to not have guests or search engines access to.
    • Your very own blog. Write about anything you like on your own individual blog.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral

Microexclusions

The other day, at my art association meeting, the subject came up of a member having a private showing in his home. When his address was mentioned, another member said, "That's a beautiful neighborhood."

Now, there are a lot of things you can say about my neighborhood but "beautiful" is not one of them and never will be. I feel like putting up a sign, "This is NOT an abandoned mobile home park. People still live here." There are mobile homes in varying stages of disrepair. The Village has said that they are going to get on the owner to get rid of them. They aren't doing it because they want to help us residents out. They are doing it because it is part of their greater plan to beautify and gentrify the town. I heard talk at a local restaurant that they are going to be putting in charging stations for electric cars soon. Well, I don't know anyone around here who is driving an electric car but I know who isn't and who won't be. Those charging stations are not meant for people in my park. We have no part in the revitalization of "downtown." In fact, we are not even on the map!

This is not meant to be a poor me blog. Yes, I am a little jealous of this artist's beautiful home and beautiful neighborhood. I haven't seen it yet, but I have a pretty good idea of what it looks like. I am glad for him that he can afford such beautiful and secure surroundings.

What this blog is about is the countless ways that poor and low-income and struggling people are inadvertently made to feel unwelcome or uncomfortable every time they turn around. I have heard the term "microaggression" used to describe numerous small, almost unnoticed, slights directed against people of color and other groups. I would like to coin the term, if it isn't already used, "microexclusion", because I feel that is more accurate in this situation. When someone uses the term "trailer trash" to refer to mobile home park residents, that is a microaggression.

A "microexclusion", however, is the act of leaving someone out, whether intentionally or unintentionally. When I hear someone's neighborhood described as beautiful--and I am the only one in the group who does not own such a nice home--that is an inadvertent microexclusion. It is a message that I don't really belong even if I can paint my head off. It means I have stepped above my place. Because I can never host a show where I live. Are you kidding? For one thing, would any of these people even come if I did? I can hear the whispers, the sidelong glances of pity. I don't want their pity or their condescension. I want to stand on my own two feet and not be judged for where I live.

My neighbors, the ones I am so frustrated with, know better. That is why they don't get involved in anything outside of a few limited activities where they are not going to be reminded of their socio-economic status. They know, and they teach their children, where they stand. How many times have I heard one of my neighbors say, "That's for rich people. That's not for us."? They weren't describing the lifestyles of the fabled One Percent. They were describing places and activities that my middle-class friends outside the park take for granted. These people aren't artists or writers or singers (although one briefly had a country-western band). They aren't involved in drama and neither are their children through school. So they don't hurt themselves battering against invisible walls. They know who they are and where they stand and where they belong.

We recently had a school bond election to replace the aging elementary school across the street from where I live. It's the third time that this issue came up and this time it passed. My neighbors, not surprisingly, were all against it. Some even came out to vote, which they never had before. Because they knew who that new school was going to benefit. In their opinion, the old school was still perfectly serviceable and that the main reason for a brand new school was to impress the better-off parents who lived in the subdivisions outside of town. Their children and grandchildren--trailer park children--would not get any better education in the fancy new school. If their kids and grandkids struggle with learning, who cares? That is how they feel. Excluded. Unwelcome. Reminded of the inequality of their situation. And once again, as usual, they lost.

Comments

I am so sorry you feel this way. I think perhaps you are putting words into the mouths of people you have never even met. I don't deny that there certainly are some people who believe exactly as you say and don't want 'lower classes' mixing with them. But I also know that there are people who don't care. I have been poor to the point of choosing between eating and paying rent. Happily enough I am now in what would probably be considered middle class. I worked hard to get here.

I know it is hard, but if you limit yourself and your children then that is sad. If you are interested in drama, then get involved. If your children are interested in something then get involved. Don't let other peoples attitudes limit who you are.
 
I don't have children or a partner. I won't say that these people don't want lower class people mixing with them; I've never had anyone tell me I am not welcome because of where I live.

What I am talking about is the way society is arranged to support those who have a greater disposable income and ignores the fact that many people are struggling. There is a certain amount of self-segregating there. I wrote not long ago how my church wants to sponsor an anti-racism seminar that costs $400 for 2 1/2 days of training by bringing in national speakers, etc. They are making the assumption that there will be enough people who have the ability to pay $400 for this training, and they are probably right. But that also ignores the very real fact that there are plenty of people who otherwise might be interested in this training who cannot afford $400. Offering a handful of scholarships isn't enough. There is a cheaper way of doing this same training which does not involve paying expenses for national speakers and reserving fancy ballrooms but they do not think this way. It's not a matter of "we don't want the lower classes mixing with us in this" because that would require conscious thought. This is unconscious. They hold the big, flashy training because that what people who can afford the big flashy training have come to expect. It's not about the information, it's about the atmosphere. There is no reason one or two volunteers couldn't teach the same course in the church basement. It's just never crossed their minds that you don't have to have all the bells and whistles. It is the people who have the money that drive the decision-making process, not the people who have to choose between food and rent. This is what I am talking about.
 
I don't really know what one can conceivably do to change other people's behavior with regards to making certain segments of the population feel less excluded. Someone is always going to be odd-man-out, and it seems to me that it's up to that individual to come to terms with his/her own lifestyle and to respond differently. Just because someone is poor and lives in a shack (like me for instance) doesn't mean his/her intellect reflects his/her surroundings. I know I'm better than where I live, but I made choices that caused me to have to live where I do, and fate threw a few curve balls that prevented me from doing any better. Such is life. There are winners and losers in the material realm. I could never run a business out of my home if I had to have clients come to my office. I would have to rent an office space, or my clients would be skeptical of my abilities by merely looking at my neighborhood. Is that wrong? Maybe, but it's a fact of life whether it is admitted or not. It's human nature to segregate and to make judgments based on appearance. I realize that, so I make the necessary adjustments and understand it's my responsibility to do so. I got dealt a bad hand in life. Not as bad as many, but certainly worse than the middle class segment of society. I choose to respond to exclusionary situations by swallowing my pride and admitting I have to work extra hard (or otherwise go out of my way) to lessen the effect of my circumstances. Positive self-talk helps, remembering that I'm just as good or better than those who have more tangible wealth to throw around.

On a broader scale, I say if you see a situation like the one you described in your church, maybe enlighten the members and see if they would be willing to present a low-cost version of the same material for low-income participants. Yes, ideally it would be better to have both groups in the same atmosphere, but it's not an ideal world we live in. People with a lot of wealth don't necessarily want to sit in a church basement to hear a presentation. It's not that the atmosphere is more important than the message. I think it's like sensory issues for autistic people. Their senses are genuinely offended by a less than optimal environment, and they are out of their element. It probably affects their ability to process whatever information is being delivered too. Sure, maybe it seems snooty, but people get used to a certain level of affluence and don't know how to deal with anything else. It's similar when your neighbor says, "That's for rich folks, not for us." Some poor folks wouldn't know how to act in an environment of opulence either.
 
Change what you said from income to race or sexual orientation, and I don't think you'd find too many people agreeing with you. At one time people of color and people with different sexual orientations were told pretty much the same thing, that it was up to them to deal with it because white people and straight people were never going to change. How many people who have been bullied have also heard the same thing, that you can't expect people to change, so you need to focus on you? How many women who have experienced sexual harassment or rape have been told the same thing about male attitudes?

If people are not going to change, then that $400 per person anti-racism seminar is not only a waste of money, it is a waste of time. If people are not going to change, then it is a waste of time to speak out and educate others. If people are not going to change, you might as well accept the situation as it is. Would Nelson Mandela, Rosa Parks, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. or Cesar Chavez, just to name a few, agree with you? I don't think so. They did as they did and said as they said, because people CAN change.

When I hear "people are not going to change" what I hear is, shut up, don't speak about it, accept your situation in life. And that is exactly what those in charge want those that they are controlling to think. They want them to give up. I'm sure the people I mentioned above heard that phrase more than once. But they did not give up and they did not accept things as they were and that is why today we have a far different society than the one I grew up in. Is there justice for everyone? No. Are there categories of people that are still being discriminated against? Yes. But I am old enough to remember a time when discrimination was open, widespread, and LEGAL. When it was acceptable entertainment to openly make fun of certain ethnic and racial groups. And what people from those groups were told when they protested it. "Stop being so sensitive!" So please do not tell me people do not and cannot change.
 
I believe true empowerment comes from within. People can change. They just can’t be forced into changing. Demonstrating equality is the only effective means of gaining equality. I don’t agree that economic status is equivalent to racial and gender status. Economic status is largely a product of abilities and good decision-making, as both are required for success (I lacked the latter). Racial and gender status is basically the luck of the draw. Still, there’s nothing like proving a point with your own behavior. Even the biggest bigots find it hard to argue against concrete evidence.
 
I understand precisely what you're saying here. I paint too. i've done so my whole life, and while I'm pretty good, I've not yet figured out how to market my work. I have no skills like normal people for the 'in real life conversation' at all. However I do analyze it, like you have here, and I have experienced the same things. I did not know how to frame it with words until reading this. My compliments on the terms you created. I used to try to join groups that were artists but found that the focus was social and just like you said, a sort of hidden competitiveness instead of helpfulness and inclusion. So I just isolate myself now, it is too stressful for me to join anything because it turns into a huge energy drain just to block out all the garbage from people. I know for them it is not garbage, it is how they operate, I mean it is how they live their lives - but for me it is toxic and too draining. I wish there was someone I could go paint with, also take walks with in the mountains, but there just isn't.
I hope you feel better, and, happy painting btw.
 

Blog entry information

Author
Spinning Compass
Read time
3 min read
Views
1,387
Comments
6
Last update

More entries in Everyday Life

More entries from Spinning Compass

Share this entry

Top Bottom