• Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Private Member only forums for more serious discussions that you may wish to not have guests or search engines access to.
    • Your very own blog. Write about anything you like on your own individual blog.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral

Interests, Passions, Obsessions & Aspies.

Time for blog #3. Having read & responded to many of your great blogs, I'm getting the hang of what blogging actually is. I've been thinking:

We Aspies are known (by NT experts who think they know us) as prone to having OBSESSIONS. What the heck does that mean? It means a keen interest in some specific subject. This might be a more conventionally approved of subject like, in the USA, baseball & all statistics related to the sport, Marvel comic books & all things super-hero OR it might be something more obscure like algae or batteries or Medieval battle armour.

What makes it an obsession when WE do it & a hobby or interest or 'specialization' in the NT world? It depends: there's no real consensus. Since we're allegedly developmentally defective due to some unknown 'brain insult', virtually anything we do is viewed through the lens of detecting 'evidence' of pathology. An NT doing the same thing may be an enthusiast or an amateur. Make a few bucks at it or become known for it & you may have a passion. If it disturbs or annoys the NTs in your family & they think you're doing it to escape from dealing with them or with life, THEY say you're OBSESSED. Your shrink will ask you a bunch of stuff about your interest & determine with you whether or not it is causing you distress, if you freak out when you don't get to do it, if it is 'interfering' with your ability to meet other life demands & may even look at whether your interest is 'socially appropriate' (because if lots of NTs don't approve of having an interest in wing nuts, YOU NEED HELP!).

Now...if you really want to go into the BAD LANDS mental health-wise, you cultivate or develop a full-blown OCD. You are preoccupied with a fear of _____X_____ (<-----select an obsession & add it in here) You do _____Y_____ (<---- add compulsion here) because it temporarily relieves the anxiety associated with your obsession. VOIL?! You're officially an OCD guy (or a NUT in the vernacular). This must be upsetting & disturbing to you.

There are many people with such OCDs (a civil engineer obsessed with precision compelled to re-check & micro-manage) who integrate their obsession into their life quite well & find a way to render it a career booster. IF they're neither distressed nor disrupted in life, are they magically no longer ill- even if their staff is going nuts because of him?

Think of the shopaholic who is in debt & buying all kinds of things she can't afford. She shops, gets a high from it, stuffs the good into the closet, feels guilty & ashamed, becomes anxious, returns to the store & roundabout it goes. Now, think of a wealthy woman who does the same thing shopping-wise BUT, because she has the money, her closets full of unworn clothing with the tags still on do not distress her at all. Um...if you can afford to be an out of control shopper & it doesn't distress you are you no longer ill?

Using social convention or personal distress as a measure of pathology is problematic: if something no longer interferes with your life or doesn't bother you, it is no longer an illness! If society deems it bad, you're disturbed. The same woman moves somewhere else & she's completely normal. Am I alone in seeing the crazy in these inconsistencies?

Consensus & opinion are fine for some things but when it comes to labelling someone as ill & medicating them, it isn't. We Aspies (especially the more suggestible ones!) need to be aware of these inconsistencies & NOT be too quick to begin taking medication: there mightn't really be anything wrong with you.

Comments

Clearly mapping out pathology is related to "the norm"... majority rules.

How is it objective to judge what someones problems is, if we cannot view it in a vacuum?

I'm quite sure that if I didn't get the Aspie label, I'd be diagnosed with a plethora of other disorders including OCD. And why is that? Clearly because I do not fit the norm with whatever interest I take to a new level.

It's a cultural thing as well I guess. But still, even cultural means are no way to create a vacuum.

On the other hand if there was no "deviant" behaviour, nothing would look out of place and no one was "weird". It was perfectly normal to kill people, steal, lie and be a shut in. I don't know how society would benefit from that either. The world clearly needs diagnostics to see problems in the world, but it's silly if we judge human behaviour in a specific environment and not on an objective scale.
 
Thanks for stopping by my blog, King_Oni!

What I find problematic are conditions or differences that get labelled as illnesses when there is no scientifically solid test that can be performed to confirm either the presence of something that shouldn't be there (like a tumour), the absence of something that should (like OMG! This guy has no corpus callosum!), an imbalance that can be detected in blood (& other bodily fluids) the consequences of which are scientifically known (a person's iron is too low according to the amt scientifically proven to be required by his body ) or something is dislocated etc. As you said, according to a scientifically valid objective scale. I wonder if one day in the relatively near future they'll toss out 3/4ths of the DSM because it was scientifically denounced as quackery?

 
In a way the entire scale in terms of seeing disorders might be difficult.

Quite a few neurological disorders aren't neccesarily proven by deficits in the body, merely by deficits in "behaviour". And to be honest, if behaviour is a measure... meh... I can act all I want.

When I saw therapists, they asked me "do you feel depressed?" for them it was clear whenever I said yes. Surely, they looked into it a bit further, but if, on certain scales you say yes to all of it (without even reading the question), you'll pass the test in all it's glory.

And if you're wondering why people would "cheat" a test... it's because apparently benefits are not equally spread over if you're "healthy" or "sick". I feel that's a reason why people might put op a game of charades.

Sometimes I wonder if we as the global population even know enough about science (and in this specific case, psychology and all subdivisions in it), to actually judge to what's "wrong" and "right". In the long run I feel it's neverending journey. A good example would be that Aspergers as an official diagnosis exists for what... 18 years? (1994 if I'm right), yet we A. don't know exactly how to offer suitable support and B. we don't even know how to diagnose everyone correctly. But still we, as aspies (but you can substitute this with every other group among disorders), are expected to function like "normal", just because they don't have a solution. Yes, it's difficult to expect everything to be there all at once, that takes time, but by all means, do not oppose rules and regulations on people if you only know half of it in terms of cause, long-term effects, opportunities in life, common co-morbid disorders and how it affects it, etc.
 

Blog entry information

Author
Soup
Read time
3 min read
Views
959
Comments
3
Last update

More entries in General

  • Executive functioning
    Not that long ago, I found out what executive functioning means. Once I understood what it was...
  • I have an idea
    I have started looking into the idea of a dual layered system. Masking and a psychological...
  • Primary sources
    I submitted an assignment recently about primary sources re: Charlemagne's coronation (800CE)...
  • Grades are starting
    Grade one starts. I remember the teacher saying I was "gifted". Now "gifted" didnt mean you were...
  • Hiding
    Have you ever been in a crowded room yet felt so alone? Always. Spent much of my life busy. In a...

More entries from Soup

Share this entry

Top Bottom