This article
Signs of Asperger's Syndrome | POPSUGAR Moms
Lists this point:
And it reminds me that people abuse the verb "understand" a lot.
Conceptually, nothing social has ever been difficult for me, and I'll venture a guess that the same holds true for any of you. As a child, I would sometimes forget something that had lower priority, such as "sharing" being lower on my list than "sating hunger", but it was there like a phrase in my passive vocabulary whose meaning I knew but didn't keep in my consciousness at all times. But if they demanded to know whether I "understood" it, I assumed they mean "know the reasons to perfection", and so I would say "no" expecting them to tell me. They never did, and I still don't know what they thought they were asking.
Nowadays I'd say I understand it from an anthropological point of view, which is the only useful way to understand the reasons behind so-called social concepts: as behaviours analogous to genes, that evolved over time, of which the most adaptive survived. Now that is understanding. In elementary school I only knew about the existence of social mores and the fact that they were adhered to.
I guess it's not the NT adult's fault that they don't know what they mean by "understand". Their condescension does harm anyway.
Signs of Asperger's Syndrome | POPSUGAR Moms
Lists this point:
3. Social difficulties are another key sign of Asperger's syndrome. Reading body language may be hard, as well as taking turns or holding a conversation. As Eliana F. shares: "Group work at school is also hard for him, as he does not understand waiting his turn or accepting others point of view." Similarly, Colleen notes: "My son is very social, but he doesn't engage in two way conversations. He just talks and talks." As a result of their social difficulties, children with Asperger's syndrome may seem isolated from their peers.
And it reminds me that people abuse the verb "understand" a lot.
Conceptually, nothing social has ever been difficult for me, and I'll venture a guess that the same holds true for any of you. As a child, I would sometimes forget something that had lower priority, such as "sharing" being lower on my list than "sating hunger", but it was there like a phrase in my passive vocabulary whose meaning I knew but didn't keep in my consciousness at all times. But if they demanded to know whether I "understood" it, I assumed they mean "know the reasons to perfection", and so I would say "no" expecting them to tell me. They never did, and I still don't know what they thought they were asking.
Nowadays I'd say I understand it from an anthropological point of view, which is the only useful way to understand the reasons behind so-called social concepts: as behaviours analogous to genes, that evolved over time, of which the most adaptive survived. Now that is understanding. In elementary school I only knew about the existence of social mores and the fact that they were adhered to.
I guess it's not the NT adult's fault that they don't know what they mean by "understand". Their condescension does harm anyway.