@Fino
The point I am trying to illustrate is that when someone provides zero context and unsolicited career advice, it comes across as questionable.
Communication is a huge part of one's work experience and a part where many autistics struggle, yet here is a post riddled with issues offering advice...
Presentation matters. Typos happen. Minor grammar errors happen. The reason I spoke up: There are six improperly capitalized nouns within the first sentence.
How we write tells a lot about context, about the reliability of a resource.
It takes ten seconds to fix an incorrect capital letter, someone doesn't bother with that small step, what bigger issues are going to be missed?
Little things, details build foundations. Writing is an extension of the individual. How one approaches it is very much akin to a first impression.
And this first impression is a big red flag given the presentation.
In order for advice to be functional, it needs to be understandable, usable, but it also has to come from a reliable source. People listen to those we trust or respect, not the random stranger on the street.
Approach the work from an objective standpoint and address the issues on the clarity and effectiveness of the post, not the poster.
Basic critique. What doesn't word and why, and solutions for consideration.
The post fails to effectively communicate with the majority of readers. It is something that can be corrected with some basic editing and a few minutes of work.