• Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Private Member only forums for more serious discussions that you may wish to not have guests or search engines access to.
    • Your very own blog. Write about anything you like on your own individual blog.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral

Do aspies need sex?

mlrock - you say that it is "generally rare that I manage to land a second date, often because my personality comes off too strong and I seem to want to get too 'physical' when all they want at most is to 'cuddle' and 'spoon.'"

Since you are aware that this is a problem, have you considered changing your behavior so that you don't come off so strong? My first date ever was with a guy who probably was on the spectrum and he behaved like he was a bull and I was a cow in heat. I am still, 40 years later, reeling from the shock of that experience. I came from a sheltered background where this sort of thing did not happen--and if it did, it was because the girl asked for it--and therefore there was NOBODY I could talk to about it, nobody at all. I don't know if this means anything to you at all, but please, think very hard before you just barge ahead with getting physical. Depending on the circumstance and depending on the person, you might end up having charges brought against you. I did not know until years later that I could have charged this guy with criminal sexual conduct. It doesn't have to be full penetrative intercourse, either, just touching someone on their genitals is enough. And once you wind up on the sex offender registry it will follow you the rest of your life. So, please, cool it, don't be so anxious to rush into it.
 
If it wasn't because of cold nights :cold: in caves, the human species might be extinct today...
 
Last edited:
Hi everyone I am going crazy because i live an hour away from my bf and he is an aspie. I am NT. But he is perfectly content with rarely being intimate with me. I feel like a drug to him. He sees me gets his fix and leaves. Feedback?

I know I definitely do. I have a pretty high sex drive; since I suck with women, I watch porn and masturbate between 1-3 times a day. It can be a little frustrating when you aren't very mentally or physically attractive to women.
 
Hi everyone I am going crazy because i live an hour away from my bf and he is an aspie. I am NT. But he is perfectly content with rarely being intimate with me. I feel like a drug to him. He sees me gets his fix and leaves. Feedback?

It seems like the question you should be asking is whether or not aspies feel obliged to make love, rather than the simple the act of sex.

Everyone needs to love and be loved to some extent, but not everyone feels that this needs to be provided through sexual intercourse.
 
It seems like the question you should be asking is whether or not aspies feel obliged to make love, rather than the simple the act of sex.

Everyone needs to love and be loved to some extent, but not everyone feels that this needs to be provided through sexual intercourse.

While your question is spot on, one might wonder if everyone needs to be loved. Some (and not just aspies) might only be out to release some primal urges.

What's also interesting... and this thought just popped up; who says the ones you love are the ones you need to get sexual with?

Which probably is an extension to "does having sex need to be part of loving someone?"
 
I have an extremely high sex drive while in a relationship. When I'm single though, I go long periods without it. I don't do one night stands, nor the friends with benefits thing.

Good for you. And since you have such a high sex drive a good healthy alternative is to masturbate. I don't know why it is viewed as something tabooed.
 
Well, now that I am single I need to revise my last post:

It's awesome but not happening currently, and I don't mind. I was starting to get claustrophobic with random things in the last year or so and hopefully that is only temporary. Don't smother me... Lol...
 
UGH dont even get me started on cats....bf has THREE all of which seem more intriguing to him than I do when I go over to his house...

Sends me videos and pics of his cats all the time like I am supposed to care.....send me a pic of yourself if youre going to bother....jeez so feminine for a guy to be THAT into cats its such a turn off...but I dont know how to tell him...I have asked him to get rid of them and he says if he ever moves out he will but I have my doubts,....If a guy cares more about his cats than his gf than he has no business having one
Wait, why should he get rid of his pets for you? If I had pets, met a girl and she told me to get rid of them, I'd tell her to take a hike.
 
It is a proven fact that humans need certain emotional stimulus's to be healthy, and that certain experiences fulfill these differently in different people. I would argue that sex could satisfy this in some, just as affirmations or touching do in others.
It is also believed that reproduction is a basic need for all living things, and that without it, we would have no purpose and would be extinct.
Thirdly, we also know that women who do not have babies have a much higher rate of health problems in their later years.
All of these pose a logical argument for the need in some people to have sex.

out of curiosity, can you site any articles/papers about this? i've never heard this before.
 
Thirdly, we also know that women who do not have babies have a much higher rate of health problems in their later years.
out of curiosity, can you site any articles/papers about this? i've never heard this before.
Not having children increases a woman's chances of breast cancer or ovarian cancer. Contraceptive pills and abortion also increase the risk of certain cancers.(for women with PCOS, such contraceptives can decrease the risk of uterine cancer, but for most women contraceptive pills increase cancer risk) I don't know about other health effects of having or not having children.
I'm feeling too lazy to search for articles about this...the above is from memory.
 
It is also believed that reproduction is a basic need for all living things, and that without it, we would have no purpose and would be extinct.
Thirdly, we also know that women who do not have babies have a much higher rate of health problems in their later years.
Sex is a need for the human species but not for the individual. The individual might feel like it is a need for him or her individually, but that feeling is nothing more than an instinct the ultimate purpose of which is to ensure, by means of procreation, the continuation of the species.
 
Sex is a need for the human species but not for the individual. The individual might feel like it is a need for him or her individually, but that feeling is nothing more than an instinct the ultimate purpose of which is to ensure, by means of procreation, the continuation of the species.
I can agree with your point and see the truth and logic in it, but what constitutes need? I believe it is different for different people.
 
(Sorry misread - want to delete post but can't, so edited)
 
Last edited:
Not having children increases a woman's chances of breast cancer or ovarian cancer. Contraceptive pills and abortion also increase the risk of certain cancers.(for women with PCOS, such contraceptives can decrease the risk of uterine cancer, but for most women contraceptive pills increase cancer risk) I don't know about other health effects of having or not having children.
I'm feeling too lazy to search for articles about this...the above is from memory.
i'm not sure if your memory is accurate because some of this strikes me as false. first of all, not all women who don't have children use the pill as birth control. second of all, i have a friend who recently developed metastatic cancer after having her second child, and the doctors told her it developed due to the hormone changes her body went through during and after her pregnancy. she has already survived a bout of breast cancer after her first daughter was born 7 years ago. i would be interested to see the studies on increased cancer risks for women who don't have children, if they are out there.
 
thank you for those. it seems that the most at risk are women who give birth only once, and past the age of 35. women who never give birth have a slightly increased risk of developing breast cancer later in life according to the one study sited in that second link. still not enough motivation for me to consider having children, just to avoid a slightly increased risk of breast cancer. lol

i think if i'm fated to experience breast cancer, then i would rather avoid pregnancy and experience the cancer later in life, then get pregnant now and have breast cancer before i even hit 40.
 
UGH dont even get me started on cats....bf has THREE all of which seem more intriguing to him than I do when I go over to his house...

Sends me videos and pics of his cats all the time like I am supposed to care.....send me a pic of yourself if youre going to bother....jeez so feminine for a guy to be THAT into cats its such a turn off...but I dont know how to tell him...I have asked him to get rid of them and he says if he ever moves out he will but I have my doubts,....If a guy cares more about his cats than his gf than he has no business having one

All I can say is :eek:!!!!!! Grumpy Cat is not liking you right now.
 
i'm not sure if your memory is accurate because some of this strikes me as false. first of all, not all women who don't have children use the pill as birth control.
I never said that they did. Not sure how you read that into my post.

second of all, i have a friend who recently developed metastatic cancer after having her second child, and the doctors told her it developed due to the hormone changes her body went through during and after her pregnancy. she has already survived a bout of breast cancer after her first daughter was born 7 years ago. i would be interested to see the studies on increased cancer risks for women who don't have children, if they are out there.
I was referring to generalizations, not to every individual case.
Facts about OVARIAN CANCER

What are the risk factors for breast cancer?
From the above website:
Lifestyle-related factors and breast cancer risk
Having children
Women who have had no children or who had their first child after age 30 have a slightly higher breast cancer risk overall. Having many pregnancies and becoming pregnant at a young age reduce breast cancer risk overall. Still, the effect of pregnancy is different for different types of breast cancer. For a certain type of breast cancer known as triple-negative, pregnancy seems to increase risk.

Birth control
Oral contraceptives: Studies have found that women using oral contraceptives (birth control pills) have a slightly greater risk of breast cancer than women who have never used them. This risk seems to go back to normal over time once the pills are stopped. Women who stopped using oral contraceptives more than 10 years ago do not appear to have any increased breast cancer risk. When thinking about using oral contraceptives, women should discuss their other risk factors for breast cancer with their health care team.

I would like to state that a risk factor is only a risk factor. It does not mean that everyone with that risk factor will get that disease, nor that everyone without that risk factor will not get that disease.
I am also not saying that people should have children or not have children based on slightly elevated risks or decreases in risks for certain diseases. Those slight increases or decreases of risk factors are not the things that such important life-changing events such as conceiving and caring children should be based upon.
But still it's good to be aware of those risk factors that might apply to oneself.
 
Last edited:
I can agree with your point and see the truth and logic in it, but what constitutes need? I believe it is different for different people.
True, the word "need" is used with different levels of meaning. I need water and oxygen or else I will die. I might "need" a hug, but not getting one won't kill me.
 
I can agree with your point and see the truth and logic in it, but what constitutes need? I believe it is different for different people.
I never said that they did. Not sure how you read that into my post.


I was referring to generalizations, not to every individual case.
Facts about OVARIAN CANCER

What are the risk factors for breast cancer?
From the above website:
Lifestyle-related factors and breast cancer risk
Having children
Women who have had no children or who had their first child after age 30 have a slightly higher breast cancer risk overall. Having many pregnancies and becoming pregnant at a young age reduce breast cancer risk overall. Still, the effect of pregnancy is different for different types of breast cancer. For a certain type of breast cancer known as triple-negative, pregnancy seems to increase risk.

Birth control
Oral contraceptives: Studies have found that women using oral contraceptives (birth control pills) have a slightly greater risk of breast cancer than women who have never used them. This risk seems to go back to normal over time once the pills are stopped. Women who stopped using oral contraceptives more than 10 years ago do not appear to have any increased breast cancer risk. When thinking about using oral contraceptives, women should discuss their other risk factors for breast cancer with their health care team.

I would like to state that a risk factor is only a risk factor. It does not mean that everyone with that risk factor will get that disease, nor that everyone without that risk factor will not get that disease.
I am also not saying that people should have children or not have children based on slightly elevated risks or decreases in risks for certain diseases. Those slight increases or decreases of risk factors are not the things that such important life-changing events such as conceiving and caring children should be based upon.
But still it's good to be aware of those risk factors that might apply to oneself.

i suppose you missed the lol at the end of my comment, which was meant to indicate that i wouldn't seriously make a decision like whether to have children or not based on what i might read about slightly increased risks for breast cancer in an online forum. lol
 

New Threads

Top Bottom