• Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Private Member only forums for more serious discussions that you may wish to not have guests or search engines access to.
    • Your very own blog. Write about anything you like on your own individual blog.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral

Asperger's - Identity Kepy, But Autism Diagnosis redefined

Geordie

Geordie
Early next year, a new definition of autism will be used by scientists in order to more precisely diagnose kids with the brain disorder.

The diagnosis of Asperger?s syndrome, considered a ?higher functioning? form of autism, will disappear once the new criteria for identifying the disorder come out in May 2013, according to Dr. Catherine Lord, director of the Center for Autism and the Developing Brain ? a collaborative program between New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College and Columbia University, in partnership with the New York Center for Autism.

The proposed changes on how doctors define and diagnose autism were the subject of a research study conducted by Lord and published in the latest issue of the American Journal of Psychiatry.

?As a scientific medical diagnosis, Asperger?s is merged into autism spectrum disorder,? said Lord. ?Our committee felt there just wasn?t any way to justify its continuance.?

Lord is part of the American Psychiatric Association?s working group responsible for updating the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, a guide used by physicians around the world. Improved diagnosis leads to better treatment.

?There was so much confusion of who had Asperger?s and who didn?t. We were also concerned that there were kids being denied services because Asperger?s sounds like a better diagnosis,? she said.

Autism rates are staggering in North America. A debate is currently raging among physicians as to whether or not the rates are actually increasing or if experts have just recently recognized that many social and developmental syndromes are linked.

One in 88 children is believed to have the neurological disorder. Autistic kids can display a range of symptoms from repetitive or aggressive behaviour to a complete lack of social skills and an inability to speak, communicate or make eye contact with others.

Clinicians are scrambling to better define autism in an effort to quickly identify children and get them into interactive, behavioural treatment. There is no cure for autism and the burden on families can be immense as many autistic people cannot live on their own.

Nearly 70 years ago, Austrian pediatrician Hans Asperger was the first to notice in his practice intellectual children with social problems who were somewhat obsessed with specific topics or subjects. These children often avoided eye contact and were clumsy.

But it wasn?t until the 1990s that Asperger?s syndrome was added to the list of the manual of mental disorders. It was noted to be similar to but different than autism.

Famous people throughout history thought to have Asperger?s include physicist Sir Isaac Newton, Microsoft founder Bill Gates, British author Jane Austen and movie director Alfred Hitchcock.

Reaction to the changing scope of autism was positive by Canadian doctors working in the field.

There is no biological or genetic reason why Asperger?s should be separated on its own, said Dr. Evdokia Anagnostou, a child neurologist at Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital.

?We assumed they were different but it looks like they are not,? she said. ?Now we can call them all autism.?

Also being swallowed up into the autism spectrum is Pervasive Developmental Disorder, a term used to classify some developmental issues, including the inability to socialize.

Child psychiatrist Dr. Peter Szatmari, a professor at McMaster University and a noted expert on autism, said the changes are a ?good thing? as it will speed up the diagnostic progress.

But he cautioned that autism is ?incredibly heterogeneous.?

?In 30 years, I don?t think I could say I have seen two cases the same,? he said, adding every child with autism needs his or her own individually tailored treatment path.

?You can?t treat a two-year-old who is profoundly intellectually disabled and without language as the same as a seven-year-old who is very chatty about their stamp collection,? he said.

?We need a way to capture that diversity,? he said. ?This is the part that I am still not clear about.?

People previously diagnosed with Asperger?s should be able to keep that label or name, noted Alycia Halladay, director of environmental research at the U.S.-based Autism Speaks advocacy group.

?The intent is to ensure that people with Asperger?s receive the same needed interventions and services as those with an autism diagnosis,? she said.

The changes being made are the result of ?serious consideration by the scientific community,? Halladay said. ?There is overwhelming evidence that the new criteria (do) a better job at identifying those people with an autism spectrum diagnosis,? she said.

Torstar News

http://www.thespec.com/living/healt...-redefined-as-asperger-s-diagnosis-disappears
 
The intent is to ensure that people with Asperger’s receive the same needed interventions and services as those with an autism diagnosis,” she said

Isn't this pretty much the problem to start with? Keyword: "same"... without being elitist and trying to be "different" among the "different", even think that no 2 people on the spectrum are the same, and stating they'll get the same treatment just as weird as clumping it all together.

If you ask me, they should use the new criteria as a diagnosis tool for something like a global assessment, and then look further to what kind it is. Now it feels like they're zooming in on the issue first and that's pretty much all there is to it. Besides; why change criteria? is it because people are wrongly diagnosed? Is it because we need more people diagnosed? Are more people actually ON the spectrum?

I sometimes wonder why the DSM has to change... much like a few other associations, some just want change so they have a reason to get funding and a reason to be. It's good that these are there, but some stuff just feels done because... well, they have a years funding and they have to spend it somehow.
 
Correction: The title should be kept.

My personal opinions:

Anyway, I do think we should really define what is really autism. It can't be just that people are more aware of autism, and need more services for autism.

It could be just that our world is increasingly more stressful, and requires more social contact, for us to live. Who knows?
 

New Threads

Top Bottom