• Feeling isolated? You're not alone.

    Join 20,000+ people who understand exactly how your day went. Whether you're newly diagnosed, self-identified, or supporting someone you love – this is a space where you don't have to explain yourself.

    Join the Conversation → It's free, anonymous, and supportive.

    As a member, you'll get:

    • A community that actually gets it – no judgment, no explanations needed
    • Private forums for sensitive topics (hidden from search engines)
    • Real-time chat with others who share your experiences
    • Your own blog to document your journey

    You've found your people. Create your free account

Answer a QUESTION with a QUESTION

Can I interest you in the "friends and family" pack that include 2 8x10s (which look lovely framed on the mantle), 6 2x3s for wallets, AND a pic of the dog?
 
Are you saying that I'm better off having photos of a man in spandex and his dog, in my wallet, from now on?
 
Last edited:
The dog would probably let me, but do you think my veterinarian would recommend putting spandex on a dog, even in cold weather?
 
Technically, "probably" would be 50%+, but since this is a large and powerful animal capable of inflicting grievous injury, but has never shown the slightest inclination to do that to a human, do you think 88%+ is a more appropriate definition of "probably"?
 
Should I be more surprised by the existence of the data, or the appalling lack of security that allowed access to personally identifiable data?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

New Threads

Top Bottom