• Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Private Member only forums for more serious discussions that you may wish to not have guests or search engines access to.
    • Your very own blog. Write about anything you like on your own individual blog.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral

How much is your talent worth? Or do you have just useless talents?

  • Author Author King_Oni
  • Create date Create date
  • Blog entry read time Blog entry read time 5 min read
It's a question I've been asking myself the past few days. It's also a question I've been asking a few of my friends.

I feel a lot of people don't really care for a lot of talents, except what they're being educated/trained for. They get educated, get a degree, land a job and that's that... well, if everything goes well at least. Add in that a lot of people don't really want to spend a lot of time in doing what they like... or so it seems. A lot of people are dealing with peer pressure and "what society expects of them". Apparently, there's a fair share of "geeky interests" that are being frowned upon as "weird". Why paint toysoldiers if you can buy a car and date gorgeous women? Well, clearly the answer is; because I want to, and because I can. Add in that I might be good at things I do, even if society doesn't deem them having some kind of "added value". But that rationale does not apply to a lot of people I guess. You can't market your personal touch to the world... you can try to market your talents in a specific brand or niche, but that's about it. And especially with arts, trying to make a living out of it is hard, if you want to keep on the track you want planned out. For perspective; musicians usually make more money by doing live gigs than by selling albums. Well, what if I'm a musician that does not want to play live for whatever reason? Does that make me a bad musician? Or does it make me a bad commercial talent?

Granted, I take a look to dutch culture (and thus not US or UK culture where a lot of people on this board are from). But just like "growing up" you are being given responsibilities and probably even chances, yet no one ever wondered if one can deal with those. I confess I had a lot of chances and options and I blew a lot. But in hindsight; when is something a chance? Is the ability to start college and get it funded a chance? Of course! But is it when not one course appeals to your interest in the very least? Even for college you need a few things; money and interest/perseverance. Money in general wouldn't be the issue with student loans... that's something I'm not losing sleep over. Interest and in the long run, perseverance is a different deal. You actually have to want it. That's a responsibility that is expected. It's not expected to quit... but likewise it's not expected for you to start a course that does not fit your needs/interests. You need to shine in what you're in college/university for, it should match your personality, your character, your outlook on life... stuff like that.

Last night I was having a walk with a friend who, like me, is on the spectrum. And I'm seeing him go bad, and kinda mental over the past few months. He's currently in college and has an internship, but he's pretty much on his way to a therapist right now because he cannot deal with the time and energy college and work requires of him. Adhering to social etiquette tires him out and quite often he'll sleep away the stress in 16 hour runs only to sleep, work, sleep, work, sleep, work... and so on. Now he's getting depressed because he cannot find a lot of fun in things to do on top of the fact that he does not have enough time to get a decent breather). So he's skipping school and work over here and there. Add in the fact that he recently stumbled upon some issues in school, school had him over for a talk and he told them "look, I'm having ASD and here's my papers". to where the school told him; "Fine... we don't want you around the next semester, we cannot see you finish college with such a condition". School doesn't want people with any "disorder" around apparently, especially not when you're going for a degree and actually want to make something out of your life.

Yes; with this comes the big question. "Do you tell an employer you're on the spectrum?". Well, to be honest, I can see why a lot of people say no, but likewise, if you feel that being on the spectrum interferes with your job, then yes. My friend got in trouble over it because they found he was a slow learner sometimes, thus they asked him "are you retarded?" (well not in those exact words, but it kinda came down to that). It wasn't a matter of insult but an honest question where they asked "are there any disabilities we should now about... cause you act as if there's some disorder with you going on."

It got me to talk about what things he does, things I do, talents he has, talents I have.

In order to keep his interests and passions alive, all while keeping himself out of the depression zone; He does some work at a tattoohop. So yes, he can draw. He has that talent. However, he's not an extremly skilled one. Some things he cannot do, some he can, thus he'd be ok if a job center would require someone to do "assembly line tattooing". And that's not a job someone can or will offer. He plays in band, he plays guitar, but exactly, what does "playing a guitar" mean. He does perform live every now and then, yet, if I'd ask him to read notes and play a song from sheet on his guitar, he cannot. And being a musician isn't a "real" job according to a job center. Besides that... yes, we can have decent conversations about philosophy, social sciences and a lot tech stuff. So in that sense we rarely end up in not understanding what topic the other is touching. Thus I think I can say he's not stupid nor does he lack any skills.

And I'm somewhat in that same boat. Yes, I know how Photoshop works, I can make illustrations (and apparently people even like those). Yet, I can make them MY way, not the way either school or a job requires me to do. I'm quite sure that if the local store asked me to design them a flyer, I'm quite sure it'll turn out a gritty design and not a cheerful thing, because I do not have a clear understanding in that, nor an interest in that. And just like my friend, I play some instruments, yet I feel that in a lot of cases, it's not that I enjoy playing it, it's that I enjoy what I'm doing with it. I like using it as a tool to create what I want.

And creating MY things with any tool I desire actually IS a talent. But if it's commision related (eg. doing it for other people or commercial purposes) I'm not talented at all. The times I was asked for either school or someone asked me to do a website it came down to "there is no passion in your work"... No there isn't. To be honest, I don't care about. Money does not trigger my passions and interests. It's as if the moment it's being marketed as "a job" I have a mental black-out and have no understanding in what I'm doing.

My talent lies in my drive to do something, not in application.

And that is totally not marketable (as of yet).

Comments

I have a talent for tarot card readings. I have actually paid bills with it in the past, but according to the so called professionals in Salem, Mass I wasn't good enough to get a license to make it my full time profession.

It's all in perception really. I think if you're happy with what you've accomplished then that's all that matters.
 
Oh... I do agree that part of it lies in happiness for acknowledging your own talents. I don't let people get me down cause not everyone likes my things.

It does become an issue with employment (or in general generating an income) usually. Thus it's not limited by what I perceive exclusively.
 
The problem with talents and opportunities is that they are not evenly distributed. And the literature I have read on the subject says that of the two, talent is overrated and opportunity is actually more of the deciding factor when it comes to success. We as a society are not good at helping people create/find opportunities. Also some talents and skills are more in demand than others. My biggest beef when it comes to college is that there are a lot of interesting but worthless (in terms of employment) courses of study out there. But of course the prospective student will not be told that. It is so sad to see students graduate with crippling debt and a degree that no one outside of their course of study gives a damn about. This is true even at the high school level. Of all the courses I took there was only one that really made a difference and that was knowing how to type.

One of my neighbors who had just graduated from high school once asked me, "Why study history?" Now this girl was not a very good student and didn't care much for school anyway. I was about to answer with a canned speech when I stopped and said, "for you, there is no reason to study history. Or geometry. Or any of the other subjects they made you study." Because she will never ever use those things in her life. She is destined for unskilled or semi-skilled labor (if she can find it). There is no demand for a history major on an assembly line. There is no demand for a geometry major flipping burgers. Back in the fifties and sixties they used to have tracking in high school--one set of curricula if you were college bound and another, more practically minded, for those who were not. And students were sorted accordingly. I understand they still do things that way in some European countries. But starting in the 1970's this system was abandoned because it led to discrimination (and there was some truth to it) so now we have a one size fits all education which is increasingly irrelevant to those who have neither the educational skills, the money, or the desire to go on to college. Meanwhile more and more jobs demand a degree whether warranted or not. Which means that the gap between talent and opportunity will continue to grow.

Historically, at least in Western European cultures, only a very lucky few got to reap the benefit of their talents. Most people, especially those of the peasant class, never had the opportunity to use their talents or even to find out what they were. Talent is something that comes only when you have the luxury for it. If you are living at subsistence level you are not going to have much energy or time for anything else. When I look at the names of those who have contributed to the sciences, to the arts, I find that many of them came from families where there was money and leisure to pursue such things. Think of Darwin for example. He did not come from the slums of London.

That is why i am concerned about the development of a permanent underclass in the United States, because these are people who are increasingly being written off. And in a world that is obsessed with the concept of overpopulation, what happens next to these people?
 
As for education; at least in Holland we have courses around that are either more theoretical or more practical, but neither are the full 100% of one side of the coin. That leads to a lot of people going through 4 years or theoretical stuff and going on to university to go more in depth. A lot of people who went to to become pediatricians, used to study it before and went on to stick another 4 years to it at university for example.

However, you're right with the fact that some courses are kinda worthless right now. I remember back when I was in journalism school we had a lecture by a famous dutch journalist and he told us "I didn't attend college". That was my first motivation to not pursue a career through education. And to be honest, a lot of courses do not really train you in what you meet on the job.

I think a degree nowadays stands for a few things;
A. the fact that you can keep your head to a subject from 9 to 5 on a daily basis
B. you have a certain level of functioning

And those things in general are what an employer looks for. Someone who will not bail on because he cannot function on that level nor someone who cannot deal with 8 hour shifts. Employers don't want to take that risk.

I think, that with opportunity comes location as well. Being online closes that distance a bit, but still, being in the right place at the right time does apply.

And I wonder, is talent really overrated? I feel that it takes a lot to be recognized sometimes, some talent was way ahead of time and created opportunity.
 

Blog entry information

Author
King_Oni
Read time
5 min read
Views
1,249
Comments
4
Last update

More entries in Everyday Life

More entries from King_Oni

Share this entry

Top Bottom