I am aware of the Aspie tendency to not notice how people use words to subtly influence in others, behaviours that are beneficial to them or change a set of circumstances via speech, this is understandable in the wider world but how is this not noticeable in more confined spaces where a grouping is limited in number.
The other thing is how this is even less noticeable to an Aspie when the Aspie is closer to that person, is it that familiarity that leads an Aspie to exclude looking as closely at a person if they show friendship or is it that we make the assumption that just because a person identifies with us they can be excused a few times along the way for behaviour we would automatically question in others.
Lastly, do you think as an Aspie it is easier to be swayed by somebody who, for want of a better word, seems to be a wordsmith, that is to say that if somebody is immediately able to make sense to an Aspie or claims to understand us then they would be more believable in what they say and by extension they are more persuasive if they choose to misdirect our thoughts or feelings.
The other thing is how this is even less noticeable to an Aspie when the Aspie is closer to that person, is it that familiarity that leads an Aspie to exclude looking as closely at a person if they show friendship or is it that we make the assumption that just because a person identifies with us they can be excused a few times along the way for behaviour we would automatically question in others.
Lastly, do you think as an Aspie it is easier to be swayed by somebody who, for want of a better word, seems to be a wordsmith, that is to say that if somebody is immediately able to make sense to an Aspie or claims to understand us then they would be more believable in what they say and by extension they are more persuasive if they choose to misdirect our thoughts or feelings.