My ADHD son may consider medication to help him focus. These are medical conditions.
I have ADHD-C and would argue that ADHD is also a neurodevelopmental condition, like autism; One of the many natural variations in human development.
There is some evidence that schizophrenia can be considered a neurodevelopmental condition as well, albeit one that includes psychosis.
....The dividing lines between different types of brain things are not so clear to me, unless you're talking about acquired versus developmental (even then, it can get a little blurry, because of epigenetics and the way the human brain can be altered/shaped by experience). Or if you are talking about whether or not the impairments of any condition are more socially constructed versus innate (but again, sometimes the lines are quite blurry).
Any condition that involves a physiological difference can be considered a medical condition, in my way of conceptualizing things -- autism included; I think this way regardless of whether or not the condition is benign/beneficial/does not require medical intervention or is detrimental/involves a disease process that requires medical intervention to prevent or slow progression or damage.
Like with ADHD, there are treatments/therapies that can ease or alter autism symptoms (like occupational therapy for sensory issues and executive dysfunction, speech therapy for communication and language difficulties, and medication for executive dysfunction/issues with emotional regulation and self control) and make life easier for the autistic person.
If ASD is simply another way that the brain can be wired--if we are simply different, not less
In context, this seems to imply that people with mental illnesses or what you would categorize as medical conditions are less, rather than simply different -- with a unique set of struggles/difficulties to contend with, that the majority do not have. I don't think you mean for it to imply that, but I'm pointing it out because I think it's important for people to question assumptions and to avoid efforts to de-stigmatize one condition by effectively saying "Leave all the stigma for this other group, it makes sense for them to have it but not us".....because it doesn't make sense for them to have it, either.
I used to say, quite defensively, "I'm not crazy, I'm just [whatever -- autistic, ADHD, sensory processing disorder]"....as if all the stigma and judgment I was trying to defend againt by saying that would be somehow deserved if I was psychotic instead....the main part of that was just wanting to be understood accurately but there was the stigma deflection aspect, too.....it seems woven into the discourse about a lot of differences.
And again, I think you may have not intended any stigma deflection in what you wrote, but I'm putting it out there because I know I'm not the only one who's ever done that. (But if I'm the only one here who's ever done that, feel free to just ignore this!)
Last edited: