The 1953 version or the 2005 one with Tom Cruise, directed by Steven Spielberg?
To be honest I thought the 2005 remake was crap, even though it featured the Tripods it didn't really follow the book at all, but then neither did the original 1953 version, which was set in California, not Woking, Surrey like the book.
So how about you lot?
To be honest I thought the 2005 remake was crap, even though it featured the Tripods it didn't really follow the book at all, but then neither did the original 1953 version, which was set in California, not Woking, Surrey like the book.
So how about you lot?