• Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Private Member only forums for more serious discussions that you may wish to not have guests or search engines access to.
    • Your very own blog. Write about anything you like on your own individual blog.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral

The link between use of anti-epileptics (e.g valproic acid) in pregnancy and autistic offspring

the_tortoise

Perpetually confused
V.I.P Member
I remember a funny conversation with the doctor when first selecting an anti-epileptic (AE) for me to take ....

Was not for bipolar/mood things nor epilepsy.

Don't have bipolar.

Dont have epilepsy
(or...if I'm in denial and have some weird variant that does not involve obvious seizures that is fine and is likely so mild it's benign/not-serious; i don't drive for other reasons nor do anything where it would matter...only reason am no longer 100% certain I don't have it is (1)my family is full of epilepsy - every generation on one side has multiple people with epilepsy - and; (2) wierd things happen in my sleep when I stop taking anti-epileptics that theoretically might be signs of seizures..but I seriously seriously doubt it.)

Supposed to be for 3 things to minimize polypharmacy.

1. Neuropathic pain (post-herpetic neuralgia that just spiralled out of control into a strange suicide-worthy centralized neuropathic pain syndrome involving my entire body ...seems to be gone as of last time I stopped taking them for a short time)

2. Severe chronic migraines I've had since childhood.

3. This was a fingers-crossed treatment item: meltdowns and possible-albeit-unliky adjunct ADHD treatment. (Never worked for this; I added this, was not doctors idea -- and the interesting conversation we had stemmed from this "would be nice if it helped this also" non-priority treatment goal influencing specific medication selection)

(4) Unanticipated fourth things treated (as in they completely disappeared and have not ever come back unless I stopped the medication) that I conceptually group together:

4.1 What I have only ever been able to call "twitchy things" once the dose was high enough ....
doctor witnessed at their worst and wanted to send me to a neurologist, had no idea what it was ... referral never happened because of my needing support I do not have to avoid disasters and communicate things to unfamiliar healthcare people, and I suspect because so many of his attempts to refer me to specialists had been rejected by the clinics and physicians involved for no clear reason or what seemed like weak excuses...suspect this was esrly stages of him wanting to give up, perhaps because he felt helpless and doctors in general seem bad at tolerating helplessness...last rejected referral he told me about he seemed both embarrassed and disheartned; another doctor at his clinic whom I had seen once called me out of the blue to ask my permission to attempt to persuade my doctor to try again after that referral was rejected, because he was so concerned about more bone damage from the inflammatory arthritis he was 100% convinced I had based on test results of seriously abnormal synovial fluid, x-rays showing damage, and blood tests...took 4 attempts to get the referral accepted at all and it was strangely redirected away from rheumatology but at least I saw someone with some rheumatology knowledge beyond GP/family doctor standard
... which originally were triggered by movement but had dramatically worsened and become chronic, needing no movement-trigger to happen, around same time as neuropathic pain but before neuropathic pain became extreme and suicide-worthy; Meaning, started I think after the 1st of 2 bouts of shingles occuring </=3 months apart -- got so bad I could do virtually nothing with my hands anymore because all movement triggered the "twitchy things"; stopped using knives for food prep or anything else; shaving my face with a razor was suddenly impossible and dangerous....

4.2 Not as noticeably until in retrospect (because they happened less often) some strange nearly-lifelong involuntary movement things I had never mentioned to anyone (mostly because i never worried about them and had no reason to mention them to anyone; they were annoying and curious, but not disabling or painful....and frankly they were so sudden and brief I actually could never recall what happened so descriptions were not just difficult like with most things, but truly impossible when others occasionally witnessed them and asked me "what was that?").

Migraines and 4.1 and 4.2 all came back worse than ever when stopping anti-epileptics once after less than a week.

I did a bit of my own research because I wanted to avoid all gabapentin analogs (which pregabalin is - pregabalin was one thing tried initially and was just awful - made me so irritated and upset I felt on edge of meltdown literally all the time, and for absolutely no reason) and ideally all AE meds that were known/thought to work via the same mechanism (GABA).

In researching had stumbled across some case studies suggesting valproic acid (and divalproex...essentially the same medication once metabolized) could be used and were also potentially useful for autistic people (and people with developmental disabilities of other kinds ... my doctor found the latter ones, I had excluded them as not relevent enough) with co-occuring ADHD who had "challenging behavior" and meltdowns not adequately controlled by ADHD meds, antipsychotics, anxiolytics, antidepressants etc.
Eventually my ADHD meds were just increased beyond normal max so there was no unmedicated time during waking hours and that is the only thing that has helped with meltdowns snd "challenging behaviour"....has also fixed insomnia....a little too well, going to the edge of "narcoleptic zombie" territory.
....And in case anyone wonders I don't take valproic acid anymore -- made me gain like 50 lbs and I insisted on switching to to a different AE, and I lost all that weight without trying to in approx the same time I had gained it and have had no similar issues on any other AEs

Interestingly, when I asked about trying valproic acid my doctor raised the issue of how valproic acid use in pregnancy is thought to cause (or increase the risk of) autism in the child....ie saying "what if this actually makes your autism worse?"

I thought that concern was sort of ridiculous and now think even more that it's ridiculous because:

Today it occured to me:

WHY DID NOBODY IN THE MATERIALS DOCTOR SHOWED ME (OR THAT I PERSONALLY FOUND) CONSIDER THAT EPILEPSY AND AUTISM FREQUENTLY CO-OCCUR AND ARE THOUGHT TO HAVE A GENETIC/EPIGENETIC LINK??

MEANING:

COULDN'T THE HIGHER FREQUENCY OF HAVING AN AUTISTIC CHILD SEEN IN MOTHERS (OR THE MINORITY OF FATHERS/NON-BINARY GENDERED "PARENTS" WITH THE REPRODUCTIVE ORGANS REQUIRED TO BEAR CHILDREN WHO CHOOSE TO USE THOSE ORGANS FOR THAT PURPOSE) WHO TAKE VALPROIC ACID (AND IT TURNS OUT OTHER AEs ALSO -- LIKELY MOSTLY FOR EPILEPSY, AS I THINK OTHER CLASSES OF MEDS COULD BE USED AT LEAST TEMPORARILY FOR MOOD DISORDER OR MIGRAINES IN PREGNANCY FOR MANY) BE ATTRIBUTABLE SIMPLY TO THE FACT THAT EPILEPTICS ARE MORE LIKELY TO HAVE AUTISM THEMSELVES AND MORE LIKELY TO HAVE AUTISTIC CHILDREN REGARDLESS OF MEDICATION STATUS????

WHY ARE SUCH OBVIOUS ALTERNATIVE EXPLANATIONS FOR PROPOSED CAUSES OF AUTISM SO OFTEN NOT EVEN CONSIDERED (OR NOT USUALLY MENTIONED IF THEY ARE CONSIDERED)....? (I SAW ZERO MENTIONS OF THIS ALTERNATIVE EXPLANATION MYSELF - ALTHOUGH IN FAIRNESS DID NOT DO EXHAUSTIVE RESEARCH; WAS TO HUMOR DOCTOR)


Please add your thoughts/discuss.
 
Last edited:
I think ASD can run in families and happen at random. In my honest opinion it's genetic with a trigger that we don't yet understand. I think this is also genetic and not triggered by external factors such as medicines.

A great many of the people making these connections are actually blowing smoke out their posteriors in a desperate attempt to be famous. We can safely ignore them.

In order to prove any scientific data you can't rely on just one set of results. The only way is to run multiple independent studies and compare everything. You're unlikely to get wildly different results though some variation will appear.

The way many fake studies work is to ignore anything that doesn't support their desired result.
 
I remember a funny conversation with the doctor when first selecting an anti-epileptic (AE) for me to take ....

Was not for bipolar/mood things nor epilepsy.

Don't have bipolar.

Dont have epilepsy (or...if I'm in denial and have some weird variant that does not involve obvious seizures that is fine and is likely so mild it's benign/not-serious; i don't drive for other reasons nor do anything where it would matter...only reason am no longer 100% certain I don't have it is (1)my family is full of epilepsy - every generation on one side has multiple people with epilepsy - and; (2) wierd things happen in my sleep when I stop taking anti-epileptics that theoretically might be signs of seizures..but I seriously seriously doubt it.)

Supposed to be for 3 things to minimize polypharmacy.

1. Neuropathic pain (post-herpetic neuralgia that just spiralled out of control into a strange suicide-worthy centralized neuropathic pain syndrome involving my entire body ...seems to be gone as of last time I stopped taking them for a short time)

2. Severe chronic migraines I've had since childhood.

3. This was a fingers-crossed treatment item: meltdowns and possible-albeit-unliky adjunct ADHD treatment. (Never worked for this; I added this, was not doctors idea -- and the interesting conversation we had stemmed from this "would be nice if it helped this also" non-priority treatment goal influencing specific medication selection)

(4) Unanticipated fourth things treated (as in they completely disappeared and have not ever come back unless I stopped the medication) that I conceptually group together:

4.1 What I have only ever been able to call "twitchy things" once the dose was high enough (doctor witnessed at their worst and wanted to send me to a neurologist, had no idea what it was ... referral never happened because of my needing support I do not have to avoid disasters and communicate things to unfamiliar healthcare people, and I suspect because so many of his attempts to refer me to specialists had been rejected by the clinics and physicians involved for no clear reason or what seemed like weak excuses...suspect this was esrly stages of him wanting to give up, perhaps because he felt helpless and doctors in general seem bad at tolerating helplessness...last rejected referral he told me about he seemed both embarrassed and disheartned; another doctor at his clinic whom I had seen once called me out of the blue to ask my permission to attempt to persuade my doctor to try again after that referral was rejected, because he was so concerned about more bone damage from the inflammatory arthritis he was 100% convinced I had based on test results of seriously abnormal synovial fluid, x-rays showing damage, and blood tests...took 4 attempts to get the referral accepted at all and it was strangely redirected away from rheumatology but at least I saw someone with some rheumatology knowledge beyond GP/family doctor standard ) ... which originally were triggered by movement but had dramatically worsened and become chronic, needing no movement-trigger to happen, around same time as neuropathic pain but before neuropathic pain became extreme and suicide-worthy; Meaning, started I think after the 1st of 2 bouts of shingles occuring </=3 months apart -- got so bad I could do virtually nothing with my hands anymore because all movement triggered the "twitchy things"; stopped using knives for food prep or anything else; shaving my face with a razor was suddenly impossible and dangerous....

4.2 Not as noticeably until in retrospect (because they happened less often) some strange nearly-lifelong involuntary movement things I had never mentioned to anyone (mostly because i never worried about them and had no reason to mention them to anyone; they were annoying and curious, but not disabling or painful....and frankly they were so sudden and brief I actually could never recall what happened so descriptions were not just difficult like with most things, but truly impossible when others occasionally witnessed them and asked me "what was that?").

Migraines and 4.1 and 4.2 all came back worse than ever when stopping anti-epileptics once after less than a week.

I did a bit of my own research because I wanted to avoid all gabapentin analogs (which pregabalin is - pregabalin was one thing tried initially and was just awful - made me so irritated and upset I felt on edge of meltdown literally all the time, and for absolutely no reason) and ideally all AE meds that were known/thought to work via the same mechanism (GABA).

In researching had stumbled across some case studies suggesting valproic acid (and divalproex...essentially the same medication once metabolized) could be used and were also potentially useful for autistic people (and people with developmental disabilities of other kinds ... my doctor found the latter ones, I had excluded them as not relevent enough) with co-occuring ADHD who had "challenging behavior" and meltdowns not adequately controlled by ADHD meds, antipsychotics, anxiolytics, antidepressants etc. (Eventually my ADHD meds were just increased beyond normal max so there was no unmedicated time during waking hours and that is the only thing that has helped with meltdowns snd "challenging behaviour"....has also fixed insomnia....a little too well, going to the edge of "narcoleptic zombie" territory.
....And in case anyone wonders I don't take valproic acid anymore -- made me gain like 50 lbs and I insisted on switching to to a different AE, and I lost all that weight without trying to in approx the same time I had gained it and have had no similar issues on any other AEs)


Interestingly, when I asked about trying valproic acid my doctor raised the issue of how valproic acid use in pregnancy is thought to cause (or increase the risk of) autism in the child....ie saying "what if this actually makes your autism worse?"

I thought that concern was sort of ridiculous and now think even more that it's ridiculous because:

Today it occured to me:

WHY DID NOBODY IN THE MATERIALS DOCTOR SHOWED ME (OR THAT I PERSONALLY FOUND) CONSIDER THAT EPILEPSY AND AUTISM FREQUENTLY CO-OCCUR AND ARE THOUGHT TO HAVE A GENETIC/EPIGENETIC LINK??

MEANING:

COULDN'T THE HIGHER FREQUENCY OF HAVING AN AUTISTIC CHILD SEEN IN MOTHERS (OR THE MINORITY OF FATHERS/NON-BINARY GENDERED "PARENTS" WITH THE REPRODUCTIVE ORGANS REQUIRED TO BEAR CHILDREN WHO CHOOSE TO USE THOSE ORGANS FOR THAT PURPOSE) WHO TAKE VALPROIC ACID (AND IT TURNS OUT OTHER AEs ALSO -- LIKELY MOSTLY FOR EPILEPSY, AS I THINK OTHER CLASSES OF MEDS COULD BE USED AT LEAST TEMPORARILY FOR MOOD DISORDER OR MIGRAINES IN PREGNANCY FOR MANY) BE ATTRIBUTABLE SIMPLY TO THE FACT THAT EPILEPTICS ARE MORE LIKELY TO HAVE AUTISM THEMSELVES AND MORE LIKELY TO HAVE AUTISTIC CHILDREN REGARDLESS OF MEDICATION STATUS????

WHY ARE SUCH OBVIOUS ALTERNATIVE EXPLANATIONS FOR PROPOSED CAUSES OF AUTISM SO OFTEN NOT EVEN CONSIDERED (OR NOT USUALLY MENTIONED IF THEY ARE CONSIDERED)....? (I SAW ZERO MENTIONS OF THIS ALTERNATIVE EXPLANATION MYSELF - ALTHOUGH IN FAIRNESS DID NOT DO EXHAUSTIVE RESEARCH; WAS TO HUMOR DOCTOR)


Please add your thoughts/discuss.
Agree. Association is not causation. We could start an entire thread on all manner of ridiculous and not-so-ridiculous associations that have little or nothing to do with each other.

The scientific community is unable to find the "smoking gun" because there isn't one. We can find some genetic and epigenetic triggers that increase the statistical incidence of autism...but would not be statistically significant to be considered a "cause". I am also thinking that there may be some cognitive dissonance regarding autism...that being that a difference is a disorder...that severe apraxia somehow equates to mental retardation...neither of which is true. There's a lot of gaslighting out there that adversely effects the autism community into thinking that we are somehow "defective" when, in fact, we may be simply sensing and internalizing external stimuli differently.
 
Last edited:
Medications can and do damage fetuses. Fetuses are far more sensitive than adult humans.

Also please don't use this tiny font, it's hard to read even when wearing glasses. I'm sorry, I can't read that.
 
From my reading, autistics start out with compromised immune systems. It does not take much to disrupt them, but prior to 1979, not much did.
 
From my reading, autistics start out with compromised immune systems. It does not take much to disrupt them, but prior to 1979, not much did.
Perhaps a partial truth...it is the maternal immune system. There are associations with maternal infections and autoimmune reactions...but also high body mass (visceral fat being pro-inflammatory). However, it still remains that genetics plays a stronger role. From June, 2025... https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006322324017608
 
Also please don't use this tiny font, it's hard to read even when wearing glasses. I'm sorry, I can't read that.
No need for you to apologize - I am sorry, though! I did not consider about people who can't read the smaller font sizes

I use smaller font size it to de-emphasize or separate relevent tangents and side notes from main things, but will try to remember to not do that and use another way instead now that you have made me aware - thanks for doing so!
 
During my stay in hospital recovering from stroke I was kicking the bed after effect of my transverse myelitis when I was 11 years old. Result of polio vaccine Doctor gave me what I found was epilepsy drug, noticed I was losing ability to walk months later changed family doctor told him suspect this drug was cause, stopped taking it within days noticed difference. What are these doctors thinking, had to figure it out myself. Not impressed.
 
I use smaller font size it to de-emphasize or separate relevent tangents and side notes from main things, but will try to remember to not do that and use another way instead now that you have made me aware...
full
(You could always use a stage whisper...)
 
I think ASD can run in families and happen at random. In my honest opinion it's genetic with a trigger that we don't yet understand. I think this is also genetic and not triggered by external factors such as medicines.

A great many of the people making these connections are actually blowing smoke out their posteriors in a desperate attempt to be famous. We can safely ignore them.

In order to prove any scientific data you can't rely on just one set of results. The only way is to run multiple independent studies and compare everything. You're unlikely to get wildly different results though some variation will appear.

The way many fake studies work is to ignore anything that doesn't support their desired result.
Let's assume that autism is genetic. But the question remains - what caused these deleterious mutations on the first place? Did God made a snafu by planting defective genes into Adam and Eve?( This question is for religious people). How a defective gene entered the human genome? (This question is for evolutionists)
 
Let's assume that autism is genetic. But the question remains - what caused these deleterious mutations on the first place? Did God made a snafu by planting defective genes into Adam and Eve?( This question is for religious people). How a defective gene entered the human genome? (This question is for evolutionists)
Categorize me an "evolutionist" in your artificially dichotomous binary construct (it is artifically dichotomous because many people are both religious and evolutionists, I am not one of them because I am not religious, just saying....);

And note I am a person who is Level 3 in ONE OF THE TWO ASD Support Levels Categories but not the other. (Also: In ADDITION to remembering there are TWO SUPPORT LEVELS CATEGORIES FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL AUTISTIC PERSON AND THAT THEY DO NOT ALWAYS MATCH: PLEASE remember Level 2 exists between Levels 1 and 3 ... AND IT NEEDS SAYING AGAIN : PLEASE REMEMBER that many people are like me and can have TWO DIFFERENT SEVERITY/SUPPORT LEVELS!! )

(And once you have done the above I pose a question to you:

Where in your simplistic divide between Levels 1 and 3 do you place Level 2? And you are NOT ALLOWED to get cognitively lazy about it and just pretend it does not exist and group Level 2 with Level 3 or Level 1 as if they are identical; I reject any such answer as a cop out.
)

Autism already has associations with MULTIPLE genetic mutations. It is highly unlikely a single genetic mutation will ever be found for every case of autism.

People are ridiculous about evolution. It is ridiculous to think that it is linear (ie that there is evolution and devolution) and that there is any such thing as an ever-stable, infinitely-positive-in-all-circumstances adaptation or trait....evolution has no direction nor directional limitation (it is not black and white, not "good" or "bad") and does not align with any particular value-system of what anyone thinks of as good or bad (except to the degree that certain traits or attributes are coded as "good" or "bad" socioculturally, and thereby influence mate selection... which btw can be totally arbitrary; Meaning not based on how well suited those traits are to innovation, efficiency, adaptation to change or adversity or any kind of objective survival in any particular natural enviroment besides group adherence in the group that socioculturally elevates the randomly favored trait -- think nazis favoring pale people with blonde hair -- where is the objective evolutionary positive in being pale and fair haired and blue eyed?? ANSWER: THERE IS NONE; IT IS ARBITRARY)

Genetic mutations --HUNDREDS OF THEM -- occur in EVERY SINGLE HUMAN BEING ALIVE over their lifespan simply from random transcription errors, and the more DNA damage the human sustains (from all kind of things - radiation from sunlight, from x-rays, from radon; damage from certain cell-damaging medications, from viruses) the more mutations they end up with.

The type of genetic heritability autism is thought to have is very complex, it is hypothesized to possibly involve mulitple gene sequences in the same person, as well as multiples of such sets of mutations (mutations = complete alterations or novel additions, repeats, deletions).

Autism is also mostly thought to be epigenetic -- meaning just having the altered gene or genes does not automatically produce autism; Meaning that multiple genetic sequences in combination with each other are likely required for the production of an autistic person; Meaning ALSO that certain environmental factors which determine whether genes are active or not (yes they can be turned on and off -- active or inactive ...and it goes beyond simple two chromosome dominance and recessive heritability in Mendellian genetics as taught in high school science classes) ALSO, determine whether inheriting any gene or set thereof produces an autistic person.

Say a genetic sequence is involved in the outcome of both a positive for human survival AT THIS TIME IN HISTORY ONLY (as is the case for ALL mutations for ALL species - evolution is contextual, not "good" nor "bad" in any absolute nor infinitely enduring way) and simultaneously produces a negative AT THIS TIME IN HUMAN HISTORY ONLY....the good is as good as any trait can be, the bad is as bad as any trait can be...seems to me like it would be a roll of the dice in how or why it persists, as well as infinitely complicated.

There actually are such mutations ALREADY EXTANT in human beings -- one example: the mutation causing Sickle Cell Disease ALSO happens to give a person protection from Malaria,
 
Last edited:
Let's assume that autism is genetic. But the question remains - what caused these deleterious mutations on the first place? Did God made a snafu by planting defective genes into Adam and Eve?( This question is for religious people). How a defective gene entered the human genome? (This question is for evolutionists)
See Autism Subtypes...
 
I
Categorize me an "evolutionist" in your artificially dichotomous binary construct (it is artifically dichotomous because many people are both religious and evolutionists, I am not one of them because I am not religious, just saying....);

And note I am a person who is Level 3 in ONE OF THE TWO ASD Support Levels Categories but not the other. (Also: In ADDITION to remembering there are TWO SUPPORT LEVELS CATEGORIES FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL AUTISTIC PERSON AND THAT THEY DO NOT ALWAYS MATCH: PLEASE remember Level 2 exists between Levels 1 and 3 ... AND IT NEEDS SAYING AGAIN : PLEASE REMEMBER that many people are like me and can have TWO DIFFERENT SEVERITY/SUPPORT LEVELS!! )

(And once you have done the above I pose a question to you:

Where in your simplistic divide between Levels 1 and 3 do you place Level 2? And you are NOT ALLOWED to get cognitively lazy about it and just pretend it does not exist and group Level 2 with Level 3 or Level 1 as if they are identical; I reject any such answer as a cop out.
)

Autism already has associations with MULTIPLE genetic mutations. It is highly unlikely a single genetic mutation will ever be found for every case of autism.

People are ridiculous about evolution. It is ridiculous to think that it is linear (ie that there is evolution and devolution) and that there is any such thing as an ever-stable, infinitely-positive-in-all-circumstances adaptation or trait....evolution has no direction nor directional limitation (it is not black and white, not "good" or "bad") and does not align with any particular value-system of what anyone thinks of as good or bad (except to the degree that certain traits or attributes are coded as "good" or "bad" socioculturally, and thereby influence mate selection... which btw can be totally arbitrary; Meaning not based on how well suited those traits are to innovation, efficiency, adaptation to change or adversity or any kind of objective survival in any particular natural enviroment besides group adherence in the group that socioculturally elevates the randomly favored trait -- think nazis favoring pale people with blonde hair -- where is the objective evolutionary positive in being pale and fair haired and blue eyed?? ANSWER: THERE IS NONE; IT IS ARBITRARY)

Genetic mutations --HUNDREDS OF THEM -- occur in EVERY SINGLE HUMAN BEING ALIVE over their lifespan simply from random transcription errors, and the more DNA damage the human sustains (from all kind of things - radiation from sunlight, from x-rays, from radon; damage from certain cell-damaging medications, from viruses) the more mutations they end up with.

The type of genetic heritability autism is thought to have is very complex, it is hypothesized to possibly involve mulitple gene sequences in the same person, as well as multiples of such sets of mutations (mutations = complete alterations or novel additions, repeats, deletions).

Autism is also mostly thought to be epigenetic -- meaning just having the altered gene or genes does not automatically produce autism; Meaning that multiple genetic sequences in combination with each other are likely required for the production of an autistic person; Meaning ALSO that certain environmental factors which determine whether genes are active or not (yes they can be turned on and off -- active or inactive ...and it goes beyond simple two chromosome dominance and recessive heritability in Mendellian genetics as taught in high school science classes) ALSO, determine whether inheriting any gene or set thereof produces an autistic person.

Say a genetic sequence is involved in the outcome of both a positive for human survival AT THIS TIME IN HISTORY ONLY (as is the case for ALL mutations for ALL species - evolution is contextual, not "good" nor "bad" in any absolute nor infinitely enduring way) and simultaneously produces a negative AT THIS TIME IN HUMAN HISTORY ONLY....the good is as good as any trait can be, the bad is as bad as any trait can be...seems to me like it would be a roll of the dice in how or why it persists, as well as infinitely complicated.

There actually are such mutations ALREADY EXTANT in human beings -- one example: the mutation causing Sickle Cell Disease ALSO happens to give a person protection from Malaria,
didn't invent the classification of autism in ASD 1, 2 and3. I just use whatever is given to me by the psychologists; I haven't heard any other definition of the forms of autism.
Random deleterious mutations don't stay too long because natural selection gets rid of them, which is the basis tenant of Darwinism and Neo-Darwinism. Once again, i'm not presenting my own ideas about the evolution, I just repeat what the evolutional biologists believe to be the case. It is also not my idea of the presence of a constant source of deleterious mutations that persist in a population of species.
I evaluate ideas of evolutionary biologists and choose the ones that seem reasonable to me. As for deleterious mutations, I don't see any divergence of views among evolutionary biologists. If you can name the articles of biologists whose views contradict the mainstream biology, i Would greatly appreciate that.
As far as I now, radiation is one of the causes of mutations. However, radiation leads to infertility, which excludes the possibility of having viable offspring.
 
@Outsider, the grievous co-morbids of ASD2/3 are not "deleterious mutations." They are [the results of] injuries.

Before penicillin, bacterial infections were a death sentence. A cure (or prevention), when available, trumps "natural selection." I am not proposing a cure for autism, just its completely unnecessary* and grievous co-morbid conditions.

*If successful, we would still probably revert back to the previous 1:10K statistic [for 2s & 3s], though [a.k.a. Premillennial Autism]. And it follows that those are subsequent injuries, too, just more idiopathic.
 
Last edited:

New Threads

Top Bottom