• Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Private Member only forums for more serious discussions that you may wish to not have guests or search engines access to.
    • Your very own blog. Write about anything you like on your own individual blog.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral

Oppinions needed: Faulty asessment meeting?

Tiger

New Member
If you would give me your input if you have done an asessment, I would be very greatful.

So, I know that the way Autism is assessed can vary between countires but I need to talk about this and see what you guys have to say, becauce I am concerend and I don't think it was taken seriousley.

I was denied a "real assessment" but got a "pre assessment" meating where they asked me a few questions. I was supposed to fill in some papers but since I was in a pretty bad state of mental fatigue he read them aloud. And so, here are the things I reacted to afterwards.

1. The questions honestly, felt insulting. The examples he took for each question was for short:
- Would you stand up on a wedding and burp for all to hear? (His example on the question if I can know how to behave around people and know what is expected of me)
- If there was a big event in town and Police were showing people the way, would you follow their instructions? ( Also to see if I could understand expectations)
- What does raining cat's and dogs mean?( On the qustion of taking things litterary)
- If you moved to a new town how would you get friends? ( To check my social skills. On this one I honestly said I have no clue (but then I intelectualized and said " But I guess it would be a good idea to join a club of my interest?")

Non of them came even close to touching where the real poblems are... (possibly nr 4) I asked to give my own examples but he said it was not neccesary. When I asked to give them my own rapport of 36 pages he said they did not have the time.

2. He continued with saying that I was good at knowing when to speak, was clean (!?) and well dressed and did not speak with a monotone voice, so that does not speak for it being autism either. He also said I was emotional based on another question and that it aslo ruled out autism.

( So in his eyes an Autsitic person is dirty, monotone people who do not feel feelings, think that animals fall from the sky, burps straight out on weddings, refuses to follow orders from police...) I mean... what? We did not go into how I process information, n talking about me in groups, my social life, dating life, family life, work. I chose clothes for 2 hours before going there to try to represent my "true self" but also look formally dressed and avoid sensory disturbance...

I did not get to see what number he filled in on the questions for me and now my journal says I have done an asessment that showed nothing...
I've been asking for this for 5 years. I have been on sickleave for 7 and now this.

I live in Scandinavia. What do you guys say?
 
I don't know, your health system is probably quite a bit different than ours in the US, but to me this sounded like a sort of triage appointment, where the intake medical staff would determine the needs of the patient and where to correctly direct them to receive the proper treatment.

That's sort of how our office would handle something like that, but then again, our clinic does not do the same type of health care. That's my impression though.
 
I live in Scandinavia. What do you guys say?
As described, it seemed like someone was not interested in dealing with the Asperger's/ASD-1 diagnosis...filtering them out of the system, and rather was trying to filter their diagnosis for ASD-2s and 3s (autism classic)? Perhaps a cognitive bias... or perhaps it may have been coming from administration higher up... the effects of socialistic medicine, limited resources, and related budgetary constraints.

The fact that they were not interested in what you had to say, sort of shutting you down, and imposing their bias to reject you... that seems a bit odd by US standards.
 
As described, it seemed like someone was not interested in dealing with the Asperger's/ASD-1 diagnosis...filtering them out of the system, and rather was trying to filter their diagnosis for ASD-2s and 3s (autism classic)? Perhaps a cognitive bias... or perhaps it may have been coming from administration higher up... the effects of socialistic medicine, limited resources, and related budgetary constraints.

The fact that they were not interested in what you had to say, sort of shutting you down, and imposing their bias to reject you... that seems a bit odd by US standards.
As described, it seemed like someone was not interested in dealing with the Asperger's/ASD-1 diagnosis...filtering them out of the system, and rather was trying to filter their diagnosis for ASD-2s and 3s (autism classic)? Perhaps a cognitive bias... or perhaps it may have been coming from administration higher up... the effects of socialistic medicine, limited resources, and related budgetary constraints.

The fact that they were not interested in what you had to say, sort of shutting you down, and imposing their bias to reject you... that seems a bit odd by US standards.

I don't know, your health system is probably quite a bit different than ours in the US, but to me this sounded like a sort of triage appointment, where the intake medical staff would determine the needs of the patient and where to correctly direct them to receive the proper treatment.

That's sort of how our office would handle something like that, but then again, our clinic does not do the same type of health care. That's my impression though.
Yes that sounds about right. If they had found something they deemed worthy of looking up they would send me to the ones responsible for doing an evaluation of Autism and type. I just don't feel that the questions seem "serious" and it felt strange that he did not tell me the result from a paper that I was supposed to fill out myself... but if it is very different from how you do it in the US it is not easy to judge, I understand.
 
As described, it seemed like someone was not interested in dealing with the Asperger's/ASD-1 diagnosis...filtering them out of the system, and rather was trying to filter their diagnosis for ASD-2s and 3s (autism classic)? Perhaps a cognitive bias... or perhaps it may have been coming from administration higher up... the effects of socialistic medicine, limited resources, and related budgetary constraints.

The fact that they were not interested in what you had to say, sort of shutting you down, and imposing their bias to reject you... that seems a bit odd by US standards.
I got that feeling as well, did not feel nice... I know the desicion comes from him. That's what the doctor handeling my sickleave said. But I only got a letter I could not respond too and then all went on vacation. Then I ended up in a meltdown followed by shutdown and could not reply, so I am looking into it a little now. Thanks for input, I understand it is hard to tell with different systems.
 
If you would give me your input if you have done an asessment, I would be very greatful.

So, I know that the way Autism is assessed can vary between countires but I need to talk about this and see what you guys have to say, becauce I am concerend and I don't think it was taken seriousley.

I was denied a "real assessment" but got a "pre assessment" meating where they asked me a few questions. I was supposed to fill in some papers but since I was in a pretty bad state of mental fatigue he read them aloud. And so, here are the things I reacted to afterwards.

1. The questions honestly, felt insulting. The examples he took for each question was for short:
- Would you stand up on a wedding and burp for all to hear? (His example on the question if I can know how to behave around people and know what is expected of me)
- If there was a big event in town and Police were showing people the way, would you follow their instructions? ( Also to see if I could understand expectations)
- What does raining cat's and dogs mean?( On the qustion of taking things litterary)
- If you moved to a new town how would you get friends? ( To check my social skills. On this one I honestly said I have no clue (but then I intelectualized and said " But I guess it would be a good idea to join a club of my interest?")

Non of them came even close to touching where the real poblems are... (possibly nr 4) I asked to give my own examples but he said it was not neccesary. When I asked to give them my own rapport of 36 pages he said they did not have the time.

2. He continued with saying that I was good at knowing when to speak, was clean (!?) and well dressed and did not speak with a monotone voice, so that does not speak for it being autism either. He also said I was emotional based on another question and that it aslo ruled out autism.

( So in his eyes an Autsitic person is dirty, monotone people who do not feel feelings, think that animals fall from the sky, burps straight out on weddings, refuses to follow orders from police...) I mean... what? We did not go into how I process information, n talking about me in groups, my social life, dating life, family life, work. I chose clothes for 2 hours before going there to try to represent my "true self" but also look formally dressed and avoid sensory disturbance...

I did not get to see what number he filled in on the questions for me and now my journal says I have done an asessment that showed nothing...
I've been asking for this for 5 years. I have been on sickleave for 7 and now this.

I live in Scandinavia. What do you guys say?
It seems to met that doctors in Scandinavia have the same attitude as doctors in the U.S. They would rather not deal with adult autism because they know nothing about it. The diagnostic criteria are merely guidelines, to be ignored if it looks like it will actually result in a diagnosis.
 
Yes that sounds about right. If they had found something they deemed worthy of looking up they would send me to the ones responsible for doing an evaluation of Autism and type. I just don't feel that the questions seem "serious" and it felt strange that he did not tell me the result from a paper that I was supposed to fill out myself... but if it is very different from how you do it in the US it is not easy to judge, I understand.
I would guess that those questions that were not serious were there as kind of like a filter. They serve to filter out the people who think they have autism as compared to the ones who really do (or have something else).

There are people who come into our clinic who pretend to have a condition when in reality they are drug-seeking. So their answers to our questions are what they think we want to hear, or they are what they have read about or seen in the media.

That's not to say that's what you are doing, but those questions in your post sound a lot like what we might ask people to filter out the ones who want drugs as compared to the ones who really do have a problem.
 
It sounds like what you went through at best could be summarized as a "complete waste of your time".

Though autism assessments have the potential of being very good to very bad even among individual physicians, let alone nations and their respective medical communities.

Also taking into consideration the logistics of your nation's healthcare system. Rising prevalence of autism in Scandinavian countries and various locales may also seem overwhelming to some medical professionals, who may choose to take bureaucratic "shortcuts" just to lighten their caseload. Especially with adults which can potentially complicate the diagnostic process.

Perhaps best to start the process again if possible, but with fully qualified medical professionals such as psychiatrists or neurologists. With a possibility of having to go outside your nation's healthcare system to get a proper diagnosis at a considerable cost to you.
 

New Threads

Top Bottom