• Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Private Member only forums for more serious discussions that you may wish to not have guests or search engines access to.
    • Your very own blog. Write about anything you like on your own individual blog.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral

Neuralink brain implant

Kayla55

Well-Known Member
With difficulties of disability, would you consider having this done?
I feel it should never be compulsory or how does it tie up with satellites. Is it invading our innermost thoughts, is it safe.

Would you do this?
 
Nope. Anything that has "link" in the name tells me that it is reliant on wifi and such, and there's a gut-wrenching Black Mirror episode of this latest season that I would never wish upon anyone.
 
Whilst I'm amazed with breakthroughs in sciences, I'm also scared.
This isn't same as tapping you card to pay, it's a whole new level. Another video I watched was about mind reading technology which isn't the same as lie detector test.
When think of mind-control this is new level, something that worries me that the future isn't technology gives us freedom to education, freedom to communicate....the dark side is where we loose more of our freedoms

But interestingly enough through disabilities over accidents we witness just how advanced the human understanding of the brain really is
 
My friend is against neuralink and she wants to sue Elon Musk for it.

If she's a former or existing employee, she's not alone. But it will likely be complicated.

Though what kind of defense Musk's legal representation puts up is anyone's guess. Especially if his liability insurers have control over the process. Conversely if he contractually has the option of decisions regarding his legal defense, with his wealth and resources, he could put up quite a belligerent legal defense.

Especially if it's based on attrition, forcing the plaintiff's defense to spend a great deal of money as the defendant buys time. A very ugly, but pragmatic way to win a lawsuit if you're the richest guy on the planet.

Though insurers are notorious for settling behind closed doors and avoiding lawsuits adjudicated in a court of law. Having a case is one thing. Finding top-rated expert tort attorneys willing to take on Musk is another.

Would I take on Musk if my attorneys thought I had a case? Noooooooooooooooooooo.

Elon Musk’s Neuralink Faces Allegations of Discrimination and Retaliation — Free Legal Advice | California Labor Laws | Employment Lawyers

Neuralink Faces $10M Lawsuit from Pregnant Employee

Elon Musk’s Neuralink sued by worker who claims exposure to herpes by infected monkey
 
Last edited:
For ages we've said this, and it means more now than ever before.
Business tools on internet should remain as that and not affect other platforms or internet as a whole. This is way protecting people's freedom from those with money to invest and have intents on altering the beauty of how free internet was before business started trying to take over and control.

Note in monkey article staff treated downward based on performance, this is exact nature of capitalism and honestly CEO are very often not as good as staff, it's narcisstic money trouble issue.

I really wish there was escape route for those who choose to live outside of society, where there is respect for our choices and lives. But clear history lesson is that some people can't keep boundaries or leave others alone so vicious cycle perpetuates until life is utterly miserable and yet still seems no way out rat race.
 
LOL NO. I've seen how badly a Cybertruck is engineered. Don't want the same idiot responsible for that sticking a chip in my head.
I haven't really dug my claws into Mr. Musk, back in day when I was younger we used to have customer warfare but that's calmed down a lot. I'm not sure if his truck is aerodynamic or built looking like that for mars escapade. I did have beetle once that was affordable, but very noisy. Say good for rolling but not so aerodynamic, not quite Alfa spider or anything like that. So maybe Tesla update the mars projector design, in the end beetle bugs were actually quite cool, and I still like those mini Cooper's. When you drive bug with music on it goes louder when drive faster - kind of interesting but not an everyday feature I'd use.

But musk focusing on Tesla was better idea, stick to making cars/maybe robots but he just keeps coming up with provoking technologies like satellites and brain implants.
 

This is databank for new AI developments in futuristic healthcare, so Trump is allowing free market share with Oracle CEO and competition as opposed to Elon musk owning the market, which is fair.
It is Sam's work on openAI

Do you think this is a better route for future of Medicare?
 

New Threads

Top Bottom