• Feeling isolated? You're not alone.

    Join 20,000+ people who understand exactly how your day went. Whether you're newly diagnosed, self-identified, or supporting someone you love – this is a space where you don't have to explain yourself.

    Join the Conversation → It's free, anonymous, and supportive.

    As a member, you'll get:

    • A community that actually gets it – no judgment, no explanations needed
    • Private forums for sensitive topics (hidden from search engines)
    • Real-time chat with others who share your experiences
    • Your own blog to document your journey

    You've found your people. Create your free account

Men seeking Women vs. Women seeking Men

It's a good book, an excercise in rationality, if you like that sort of thing, and it's very readable and entertaining. I don't need to tell you that the brainwashed argument doesn't hold up, one is free to read any book they like and not be tied to one text and outlook. Also the scientific method relies on verifiable evidence that's always incorporating new knowledge, it isn't fixed and rigid, so its hardly brainwashing. If there was evidence for a God, it would quickly be incorporated into scientific teaching.
Which book are you talking about?

I definitely agree about the scientific method and I find it ridiculous when it is dismissed by religious fanatics. I’ve even seen supporters of Young Earth Creationism accuse those who understand evolution as having a religion, even calling them “evolutionists.” It undermines their own position to call evolution a religion.
 
Oops his famous one, The God Delusion.

Yes, that's just being deliberately unclear in terms so as to confuse people. It's a slick slight of hand but doesn't stand up to scrutiny

I'm fine with religion as long as there is separation between political power and religion, although how long it will last in the UK is questionable. The pace of change is giving whiplash.
 
i know its the wrong attitude to have but over the years i have developed the mindset that women are the only gender that are owed a relationship for simply just existing, men are not, because by default, women always have dating options or get interest from men for just existing, men by default don't have that from women.
 
i know its the wrong attitude to have but over the years i have developed the mindset that women are the only gender that are owed a relationship for simply just existing, men are not, because by default, women always have dating options or get interest from men for just existing, men by default don't have that from women.
Once the ladies get older it reverses, forty inflection point.
 
They realize, their child bearing days may just end, get a father now or may be it's over. Plus longer they wait greater chance of genetic defects, Well documented All of a sudden the men have more choice.
 
They realize, their child bearing days may just end, get a father now or may be it's over. Plus longer they wait greater chance of genetic defects, Well documented All of a sudden the men have more choice.
and i know it has long been argued that men are naturally attracted to younger women or just women of certain age.

This post i read:

"Women are most fertile in their teens and 20s. Their fertility begins to drop, begins to decline in their 30s, while the chances of them conceiving( which means getting pregnant) in their 40s are slim to none.

It’s often argued and said that men are biologically attracted to younger women for this reason. Even if they consciously don’t want children, their body is programmed to be attracted to signs of fertility such as a youthful face, large perky boobs, and a high hip-to-waist ratio.

This is why it makes no sense to shame, no sense to criticize or to bash older men for being attracted, for liking younger women. It's literally in our DNA."
 
and i know it has long been argued that men are naturally attracted to younger women or just women of certain age.

This post i read:

"Women are most fertile in their teens and 20s. Their fertility begins to drop, begins to decline in their 30s, while the chances of them conceiving( which means getting pregnant) in their 40s are slim to none.

It’s often argued and said that men are biologically attracted to younger women for this reason. Even if they consciously don’t want children, their body is programmed to be attracted to signs of fertility such as a youthful face, large perky boobs, and a high hip-to-waist ratio.

This is why it makes no sense to shame, no sense to criticize or to bash older men for being attracted, for liking younger women. It's literally in our DNA."
Sexual attraction is there for a reason: Reproduction.

Consider:

Most prehistoric women had their first child around 18–20 years old.

This is very similar to:

  • early agricultural societies
  • many traditional societies today
  • the biological peak of fertility

The facts mean nothing to some ppl.
What can you do? <shrug>

Society has taught older men to pretend not to find attractive women attractive.
Go figure. 🫤

On the converse side, most younger women don't find older men attractive because the viability of the child will be compromised, in addition to the woman & child's provider would die much earlier than them.
A pretty pragmatic consideration, if you ask me.

If you take out procreation, greater age gaps make more sense, though not perfect, admittedly.
Having a younger partner is a concern for me, not only because I will die before her, but also because of the fear that I may develop some infirmity beforehand.
 

New Threads

Top Bottom