• Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Private Member only forums for more serious discussions that you may wish to not have guests or search engines access to.
    • Your very own blog. Write about anything you like on your own individual blog.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral

‘Intrinsically connected’: how human neurodiversity could help save nature

VictorR

Random Member
V.I.P Member
Biodiversity is linked to people’s diversity, and nature lends itself to people who are different, says author Joe Harkness.

When Joe Harkness received a message from a friend about macerating moth abdomens to check their genitalia to identify the species, it sparked an idea for a new book about wildlife obsessions. But over time, this developed into a completely different book: a clarion call to embrace neurodiversity in the fight against the extinction crisis.

Across Britain, 15% of people are thought to be neurodivergent. In the process of writing Neurodivergent, By Nature, Harkness discovered that an estimated 30% of conservation employees were neurodivergent. Why?

“People like myself, especially those who are undiagnosed, probably found nature was their balm from a mental health perspective,” says Harkness when we meet beneath an awesomely peaceful ancient oak close to his home in rural Norfolk. “The other thing is, we’re different from what we’d define as neurotypical people. Therefore we like more odd things. Special interests. Nature lends itself to people who are different.”

He interrupts his own answers by repeatedly spotting micro-moths – his latest special interest – zipping across our path. “Did you see that? Is it a yellow shell? No, it’s another one of those mother of pearl moths. Sorry. They’re everywhere.”

Harkness’s full-time job is teaching autistic and other neurodiverse children, but he did not suspect he had ADHD until a fellow teacher said she thought he had. It took a further six years to obtain a formal diagnosis and access to medication that he has found extremely helpful.

Naturalists such as the broadcaster Chris Packham and the writer Dara McAnulty have flown the flag for neurodiversity in the environmental sector but Harkness interviews dozens of less celebrated conservationists who have undertaken pioneering work on everything from UN climate talks to saving the Seychelles black parrot and restoring pine marten populations.

Harkness, whose debut book, Bird Therapy, was a surprise self-published hit, explains well why neurodivergent people can prosper in ecological jobs.

But he also makes a strong case for the natural world needing a neurodiverse cohort of people to save it. Beside the ancient oak where we talk is a small, scruffy meadow, filled with a jumble of wild grasses, insects and the flit of birds. “There is biodiversity right in front of you,” says Harkness, pointing at the meadow. “You look at it one way, I look at it another way. Therefore, if we are trying to help it, we can bring different things to it. If you’re looking at it from a completely different angle because of how your brain is wired, you bring a different approach again.

“You cannot be creative and make change and do good things unless you utilise all the different skills of the people you work with. If you don’t have diversity of people, you don’t have biodiversity. You can’t have one without the other. They are intrinsically connected.”

More specifically, Harkness reveals how neurodiverse conservationists find their “superpowers” can make them uniquely effective at their job, with skills including lateral thinking, hyperfocus, memory skills and empathy, as well as having an aptitude for fieldwork.

The autistic ecologist Naomi Davis told Harkness their favourite aspect of the job was finding and categorising species. Both Davis and the consultant ornithologist Colin Everett speak of sensory superpowers helping their surveying work: detecting fragments of birdsong that everyone else misses; even hearing bats echolocating – calls that are usually far too high-pitched for adults to hear them.

Clearly, neurodiverse people can be vital champions for biodiversity, although Harkness is bluntly honest about his own ADHD. “I don’t feel like the symptoms I experience are helpful or conducive to wellbeing and peak performance at work,” he writes.

And some people are still wary of disclosing neurodiversity. He interviews Emma Marsh, an executive director at the RSPB, who did not reveal her later-in-life autism diagnosis to work colleagues for a while, although when she finally did, she was heartened by receiving such a positive response.

As Harkness explains, harnessing the skills of neurodiverse employees often requires changes in work practices. Fieldwork – in peaceful, natural settings – is one attraction for many neurodiverse conservationists, but office-based workers may require adaptations. One senior conservationist was given permission to conduct her meetings outdoors.

Is the conservation sector meeting the needs of its neurodiverse employees? “Approaches to neuro-inclusion across the conservation sector are fragmentary at best, with some areas of outstanding practice, and some terrible tales of discrimination and needs not being met,” says Harkness.

Although “a lot of what I found in the sector seemed really fantastic”, he says, “with a bit of digging, everybody [in conservation organisations] was open to the fact that they still have a lot of work to do. But neurodivergence is a relatively new concept. I wouldn’t expect them to be all-singing, all dancing with their practices yet.”

The conservation sector has repeatedly been criticised for being so white and Harkness says any assessment of its efforts to accommodate neurodiversity must look at “how well is it engaging everybody who has a protected characteristic”.

Harkness does not want neurodiversity to be a “DEI trend” that comes and goes. For meaningful change, he says, there must be more routes into conservation through apprenticeships and not just degrees.

Working as a senior teacher at an “outstanding” complex needs school, Harkness is fiercely critical of mainstream British education, and the multi-chain academy system in particular, for failing to meet the needs of both neurodiversity and nature. Without more nature-literate schooling, he says, many neurodiverse young people won’t be able to discover the balm of the natural world – or the well-fitting jobs available within it.

“If you need something different, you’re not going to get it,” he writes of the academy school system.

His own personal schooling experience was bleak. Lacking an ADHD diagnosis as a young person, Harkness was simply written off as a naughty child of a single parent from social housing.

When he got his belated diagnosis, did he grieve for how long it took? “What I really grieved for was my experience at secondary school,” he says. “Medication has completely changed my life for the better. It doesn’t for everyone but it’s worked for me. What if I’d had that in year 11? Would I have got my A-levels and gone to university? Would I be a completely different person? Do I want to be? No. But it’s grief for what I could’ve been.”

Article link: ‘Intrinsically connected’: how human neurodiversity could help save nature
 
An interesting side note that could be relevant - there's been no formal study as yet but it's generally accepted in Australia that autism is around twice as prevalent in our indigenous populations as it is in our general population.
 
An interesting side note that could be relevant - there's been no formal study as yet but it's generally accepted in Australia that autism is around twice as prevalent in our indigenous populations as it is in our general population.
Interesting, Outdated. . . .
 
An interesting side note that could be relevant - there's been no formal study as yet but it's generally accepted in Australia that autism is around twice as prevalent in our indigenous populations as it is in our general population.
The word that stood out for me when reading this article is "neuro-inclusion." Anytime "inclusion" is a part of something, it brings a wholeness and is healthy. Neuro-inclusion is really a neat concept and it allows all of us to be a part of something larger than ourselves, alone. I really like this, VictorR!
 
Perhaps related, but from personal experience and viewing many posts on AF, it would seem that we, as a group, tend to bond with animals (pets, random strays, wildlife, etc.) and even plants much better than humans in many cases. I've always been heavily drawn to nature and when on vacation or even a weekend off of work, I am enjoying the outdoors...away from people. I can be found traveling around to botanical gardens, rockhounding along beaches and rocky outcroppings, zoos, aquariums, state and national parks, exploring caves, etc. At home, I am gardening (food crops, tropicals, desert plants, orchids, bonsai trees, etc.). I have had huge aquariums in the past, all balanced ecosystems without filters. I even use the sun to power my home and cars. So...I might be considered "intrinsically connected".
 
it would seem that we, as a group, tend to bond with animals (pets, random strays, wildlife, etc.) and even plants much better than humans in many cases.
I mentioned this in a conversation with someone else just yesterday. Most autistic people are quite sensitive to body language which is why so many of us get along with animals really well. Animals use body language to communicate but don't speak.

To a primitive people that worship nature our affinity with nature is seen as holy, where as under modern religions we were seen as evil and touched by the devil and burnt alive at the stake. When you look at it like that it's not surprising that autism is more prevalent in indigenous communities.
 
Most autistic people are quite sensitive to body language which is why so many of us get along with animals really well. Animals use body language to communicate but don't speak.
...but somehow relatively insensitive to the subtleties of human body language, subtle voice inflections and tone, and facial micro-expressions. I wonder why that is? I am far more likely to walk up to an animal, look at it, talk to it...as if it were human. So, there's a natural attraction there that I simply don't have with humans. Maybe that's why I am more receptive? Are animals more likely to be highly expressive vs. human subtleties? Sure, if a human is highly expressive, there's no questioning, but it's all that micro-expressive behavior that I just don't pick up on. Interesting phenomenon.
To a primitive people that worship nature our affinity with nature is seen as holy, where as under modern religions we were seen as evil and touched by the devil and burnt alive at the stake. When you look at it like that it's not surprising that autism is more prevalent in indigenous communities.
Interesting observation. Seems to make sense. Having an affinity for nature does give one a sense of spirituality, a oneness with the Earth. It's one of the few times where I can appreciate the grand design and see everything's place within it. Perhaps I see what humans have done to the Earth, upsetting that balance and design for the many reasons they do it, almost none of it for the nature, but selfishly for themselves. I see documentaries on the lives of indigenous peoples around the world and think, if we just let them be, they would be happy and thrive...but instead, they are constantly subjected to the stressors of the outside world that is quickly encroaching upon them. It's just sad...and makes me a bit angry. We just can't leave well-enough alone.
 
...but somehow relatively insensitive to the subtleties of human body language, subtle voice inflections and tone, and facial micro-expressions. I wonder why that is?
I was always far more sensitive to body language and micro expressions than most people, but I also have profound Audio Processing Disorder. I often struggle to hear and understand what people are saying so I rely very heavily on body language, facial expressions and voice modulation to help me make sense of the words.

Over the phone I'm almost completely deaf. I can't use the drive through section of fast food joints because I can't understand the voice from the speakers. And if there's an announcement over the PA system in a train station or an airport I can't understand any of it at all, instead I just watch the crowd and if everyone starts moving to the exits I'll follow.

[Edit] forgot to add my surmise - that perhaps it's the people without hearing disabilities that have less facility with seeing and understanding body language - because they listen to the words spoken.
 
Last edited:
I mentioned this in a conversation with someone else just yesterday. Most autistic people are quite sensitive to body language which is why so many of us get along with animals really well. Animals use body language to communicate but don't speak.

To a primitive people that worship nature our affinity with nature is seen as holy, where as under modern religions we were seen as evil and touched by the devil and burnt alive at the stake. When you look at it like that it's not surprising that autism is more prevalent in indigenous communities.
Animism?
 
I was always far more sensitive to body language and micro expressions than most people, but I also have profound Audio Processing Disorder. I often struggle to hear and understand what people are saying so I rely very heavily on body language, facial expressions and voice modulation to help me make sense of the words.

Over the phone I'm almost completely deaf. I can't use the drive through section of fast food joints because I can't understand the voice from the speakers. And if there's an announcement over the PA system in a train station or an airport I can't understand any of it at all, instead I just watch the crowd and if everyone starts moving to the exits I'll follow.

[Edit] forgot to add my surmise - that perhaps it's the people without hearing disabilities that have less facility with seeing and understanding body language - because they listen to the words spoken.
I've always been more of a visual learner than an auditory learner. I think this is because that I am almost deaf even though I wear hearing aids, bilaterally.
 
An interesting side note that could be relevant - there's been no formal study as yet but it's generally accepted in Australia that autism is around twice as prevalent in our indigenous populations as it is in our general population.
I just looked up australian indiginous meaning of autism. It literally translates to “tōku/tōna anō takiwā” – “my/his/her own time and space”. Like it.
 
I just looked up australian indiginous meaning of autism. It literally translates to “tōku/tōna anō takiwā” – “my/his/her own time and space”. Like it.
That's Maori, the New Zealand indigenous people. They used to inhabit Easter Island before their lack of care for their environment almost completely wiped out all life on that island, and they were well on their way to doing the same thing in New Zealand when Europeans discovered it. That was the Maori way, completely strip a place bare like locusts then move to a new place.

The Australian Aboriginal people were the exact opposite to that and their care for the land is both religious and cultural. They always lived knowing that they were a part of the land. They did not own the land, the land owned them and they had duty to the land. They also very strictly controlled their own population numbers so that they would never become more than the land could support.

When looking for Aboriginal language phrases be aware that there were more than 1500 languages and dialects stemming from more than 250 different base language groups. This is a map of the language groups that used to exist here:

197863707ed04b48bc49d9f698c952d5.webp
 
That's Maori, the New Zealand indigenous people. They used to inhabit Easter Island before their lack of care for their environment almost completely wiped out all life on that island, and they were well on their way to doing the same thing in New Zealand when Europeans discovered it. That was the Maori way, completely strip a place bare like locusts then move to a new place.

The Australian Aboriginal people were the exact opposite to that and their care for the land is both religious and cultural. They always lived knowing that they were a part of the land. They did not own the land, the land owned them and they had duty to the land. They also very strictly controlled their own population numbers so that they would never become more than the land could support.

When looking for Aboriginal language phrases be aware that there were more than 1500 languages and dialects stemming from more than 250 different base language groups. This is a map of the language groups that used to exist here:

View attachment 144238
W-O-W ! ! ! !
 
That's Maori, the New Zealand indigenous people. They used to inhabit Easter Island before their lack of care for their environment almost completely wiped out all life on that island, and they were well on their way to doing the same thing in New Zealand when Europeans discovered it. That was the Maori way, completely strip a place bare like locusts then move to a new place.

The Australian Aboriginal people were the exact opposite to that and their care for the land is both religious and cultural. They always lived knowing that they were a part of the land. They did not own the land, the land owned them and they had duty to the land. They also very strictly controlled their own population numbers so that they would never become more than the land could support.
Is this part of the historical cultural rift between Australians and New Zealanders?
 
Apologies for the tangent, but this topic perked my curiosity.

A.I inquiry:
Are the historical inhabitants of Easter Island and the Maori of New Zealand related?


Yes, the historical inhabitants of Easter Island (Rapa Nui people) and the Māori of New Zealand are
related
.

We are the same-same.' Rapa Nui visitors to Te Papa | Te ...

Popular Myth Debunked: New Findings Rewrite Easter Island's ...

Smarthistory – Rapa Nui (Easter Island) Moai

Smarthistory – Rapa Nui (Easter Island) Moai




Evidence of their relationship
  • Polynesian Origins: Both groups share a common ancestral origin from the larger group of Polynesian people, who themselves originated from a migration out of the area around Taiwan around 5,000 years ago.
  • Migration Routes: Polynesian voyagers expanded across the Pacific, settling various islands including Easter Island and New Zealand.
  • Language: Rapa Nui and Māori are both Polynesian languages and exhibit strong similarities. A Moriori speaker (Moriori are closely related to Māori) would have understood much of what a Rapanui speaker said, sharing over 20% of words.
  • Material Culture and Customs: Similarities have been noted in their bird cults and birding expeditions to offshore islands.

Important points to remember
  • Polynesian Triangle: Easter Island, New Zealand, and Hawaii represent the three points of the "Polynesian Triangle," encompassing the vast area settled by Polynesian people.
  • Ongoing Connection: Even though separated by vast distances, the Rapa Nui people and Māori have recognized and continue to acknowledge their shared heritage, according to RNZ.
  • Ancient DNA research on the original inhabitants of Rapa Nui have provided insights into the settlement and history of the island, helping to confirm their Polynesian origins while also exploring potential interactions with South American populations prior to European contact.
Follow up question:

Were the Maori of New Zealand ancestors of the Rapa Nui of Easter Island?


No, the Māori of New Zealand are not the direct ancestors of the Rapa Nui people of Easter Island.
Instead, both groups share a common Polynesian ancestry, and they settled their respective islands during the same period of Polynesian expansion across the Pacific
.

Polynesian expansion
  • Starting Point: Polynesian navigators, with their impressive voyaging skills, embarked on an epic journey of exploration and colonization across the vast expanse of the Pacific Ocean.
  • Island Hopping: These voyagers settled numerous islands, including Tonga, Samoa, Tahiti, and Hawaii, before reaching the most remote corners of the Polynesian triangle: New Zealand and Easter Island.
  • Independent Journeys: While the Māori voyaged to New Zealand from East Polynesia (between 1250 and 1300 AD), the Rapa Nui people most likely settled Easter Island from Mangareva, Pitcairn, or Henderson, which served as stepping stones from the Marquesas, .
  • Roughly Contemporaneous Settlements: The initial settlement of both New Zealand and Easter Island by Polynesians occurred roughly around the same time, between 1200 and 1300 AD for New Zealand and between 1200 and 1250 AD for Easter Island.
 
Last edited:
https://www.news.com.au/travel/dest...t/news-story/0fb07868a6315854a314d79358d50b31

fresh research casts doubt on a popular theory that there was a societal collapse amongst the residents because they exploited their natural resources. The theory was popularized by historians including US author Jared Diamond in his book Collapse, with the event described as one of the first “ecocides” in history.

The theory was “presented as a warning tale for humanity’s overexploitation of resources,” the authors of a new study published in the journal Nature wrote.

The island was once covered in palm trees, and the claim was that the Rapanui deforested the area to support the culture of its more than 15,000 inhabitants.

This was believed to have sparked a period of famine and war that turned into cannibalism. It was believed to have eventually ended in a collapse both demographically and culturally.

However, when the researchers – a team of experts from around the world specializing in population genetics – searched for signs of such a societal collapse, they found none.
Instead, they found evidence of a steady, growing population.

Our genetic analysis shows a stably growing population from the 13th century through to European contact in the 18th century,” study author Barbara Sousa da Mota of the University of Lausanne said.

“This stability is critical because it directly contradicts the idea of a dramatic pre-contact population collapse.”

The researchers noticed that at this point in time (1860s) slave raiders from Peru removed one-third of the island’s population by force.
It was also revealed that the Easter Islanders had exchanged genes with a Native American population. This suggests the ancient inhabitants crossed the ocean to South America somewhere between 1250 and 1430. This is ahead of Columbus’ arrival in the Americas, and before the Europeans reached Easter Island in 1722.

The genomes of 6-11 per cent of those tested were traceable to coastal South American ancestors, with the two groups meeting an having offspring an estimated 15 to 17 generations before that of the individuals studied.

“In this case, the Rapanui managed to survive in one of the most remote places on Earth and did so fairly sustainably until European contact,” said the environmental archaeologist at Columbia University.
 
Last edited:
Thanks learning about your countries culture, second cousin coming over in the next few days she is Australian She contacted me a year ago seeking family, asked if I was a Verhulst, told yes I was through my grand mother.
 
Apologies for the tangent, but this topic perked my curiosity.

A.I inquiry:
Are the historical inhabitants of Easter Island and the Maori of New Zealand related?


Yes, the historical inhabitants of Easter Island (Rapa Nui people) and the Māori of New Zealand are
related
.

We are the same-same.' Rapa Nui visitors to Te Papa | Te ...' Rapa Nui visitors to Te Papa | Te ...

Popular Myth Debunked: New Findings Rewrite Easter Island's ...'s ...

Smarthistory – Rapa Nui (Easter Island) Moai

Smarthistory – Rapa Nui (Easter Island) Moai




Evidence of their relationship
  • Polynesian Origins: Both groups share a common ancestral origin from the larger group of Polynesian people, who themselves originated from a migration out of the area around Taiwan around 5,000 years ago.
  • Migration Routes: Polynesian voyagers expanded across the Pacific, settling various islands including Easter Island and New Zealand.
  • Language: Rapa Nui and Māori are both Polynesian languages and exhibit strong similarities. A Moriori speaker (Moriori are closely related to Māori) would have understood much of what a Rapanui speaker said, sharing over 20% of words.
  • Material Culture and Customs: Similarities have been noted in their bird cults and birding expeditions to offshore islands.

Important points to remember
  • Polynesian Triangle: Easter Island, New Zealand, and Hawaii represent the three points of the "Polynesian Triangle," encompassing the vast area settled by Polynesian people.
  • Ongoing Connection: Even though separated by vast distances, the Rapa Nui people and Māori have recognized and continue to acknowledge their shared heritage, according to RNZ.
  • Ancient DNA research on the original inhabitants of Rapa Nui have provided insights into the settlement and history of the island, helping to confirm their Polynesian origins while also exploring potential interactions with South American populations prior to European contact.
Follow up question:

Were the Maori of New Zealand ancestors of the Rapa Nui of Easter Island?


No, the Māori of New Zealand are not the direct ancestors of the Rapa Nui people of Easter Island.
Instead, both groups share a common Polynesian ancestry, and they settled their respective islands during the same period of Polynesian expansion across the Pacific
.

Polynesian expansion
  • Starting Point: Polynesian navigators, with their impressive voyaging skills, embarked on an epic journey of exploration and colonization across the vast expanse of the Pacific Ocean.
  • Island Hopping: These voyagers settled numerous islands, including Tonga, Samoa, Tahiti, and Hawaii, before reaching the most remote corners of the Polynesian triangle: New Zealand and Easter Island.
  • Independent Journeys: While the Māori voyaged to New Zealand from East Polynesia (between 1250 and 1300 AD), the Rapa Nui people most likely settled Easter Island from Mangareva, Pitcairn, or Henderson, which served as stepping stones from the Marquesas, .
  • Roughly Contemporaneous Settlements: The initial settlement of both New Zealand and Easter Island by Polynesians occurred roughly around the same time, between 1200 and 1300 AD for New Zealand and between 1200 and 1250 AD for Easter Island.
This is all very interesting. Beyond this comment, I just want to say that the photographs remind me of my family reunion this past year!
 
Apologies for the tangent, but this topic perked my curiosity.
That's a seriously interesting post, thanks for sharing. That's also about the last of my public school education from the 70s destroyed. :)

New Zealand and Australia are very close, any rivalry between us is purely friendly, as other nations find out if they try to exploit a perceived rift. As nations we're very much like brothers, we argue between ourselves a little bit but if anyone else tries to join in both of us will turn on them.

As kids we saw a lot of New Zealand kids TV shows and I would assume they got to see a lot of ours. From those shows I did know that the Maori had only been in New Zealand for around 500 years before European colonisation.

I did a quick search of my own and found this map helpful:

Polynesian_Migration.svg.webp
 

New Threads

Top Bottom