Slithytoves
Oblique Strategist
Something that was lacking in the communication course I took was a proper discussion (with good examples) of how language shapes reality, and how it's used to institutionalize ideas and perspectives. The instructor touched on these things here and there but never made them a stand-alone lesson. I think it's too important to omit.
I took a Diversity & Oppression class with an instructor who had both an MSW and a Master of Communications. He based several lessons around physical demonstrations in which students became points on living "charts" of perception and experience. If you are interested in specifics and have a classroom where a physical game is possible, let me know and I'll describe in detail. His methods really drove things home like nothing else I've seen in a course.
Bringing the topic of neurodiversity into even one early discussion would be a signal to people on the spectrum that you're an ally. Just hearing acknowledgement of our existence is very refreshing in a course on subjects of special relevance to us. We're so used to being under-considered, and social anxiety can make it difficult to make ourselves and our needs known. You could reinforce your understanding by slipping in somewhere that you understand students with ASDs may benefit from a chance to ask questions or give feedback one-on-one, and that you welcome it. To cast a wider net, you could simply mention that there are a number of other reasons why some students may require additional support in a communications class, and that you consider them all equally valid. Fear of invalidation is a big obstacle to anyone with extra requirements.
I'd personally give severely group-averse students the option of an alternative assignment and let them weigh the risk for themselves.
I taught a Confirmation class for teens at my synagogue, which included a small-group project. I had a couple of students who really balked at group work, so I tasked them as "stitchers", responsible for synthesizing the work of other group members to create the final presentation. That role was understood to have autonomy, explained as extra responsibility for not having to take part in the general group sessions. The students who took that job seemed happy to be able to contribute but without any discomfort. Just a thought. It may not work in every situation.
P.S.: I also allowed students to give individual presentations privately if they needed to, in front of me and two or three classmates of their choosing (or mine, if they wished to defer to my judgment). They had to approach me under their own steam if they wanted to do that, though. I was willing to accommodate social anxiety, but not to enable it by relieving students of all responsibility for getting their needs met. You can only do so much before it's counterproductive.
I took a Diversity & Oppression class with an instructor who had both an MSW and a Master of Communications. He based several lessons around physical demonstrations in which students became points on living "charts" of perception and experience. If you are interested in specifics and have a classroom where a physical game is possible, let me know and I'll describe in detail. His methods really drove things home like nothing else I've seen in a course.
Is there anything specifically that I might be able to do to reinforce my willingness to work with my students, regarding their individual needs?
Bringing the topic of neurodiversity into even one early discussion would be a signal to people on the spectrum that you're an ally. Just hearing acknowledgement of our existence is very refreshing in a course on subjects of special relevance to us. We're so used to being under-considered, and social anxiety can make it difficult to make ourselves and our needs known. You could reinforce your understanding by slipping in somewhere that you understand students with ASDs may benefit from a chance to ask questions or give feedback one-on-one, and that you welcome it. To cast a wider net, you could simply mention that there are a number of other reasons why some students may require additional support in a communications class, and that you consider them all equally valid. Fear of invalidation is a big obstacle to anyone with extra requirements.
I personally hate group projects also, but I'm wondering how I can alter this assignment to make it more effective but also more enjoyable for my students? Currently, it's basically just a group presentation that they work on for a few weeks, and then "reflect" on in peer reviews. Any thoughts you might have would be great! And if one of my students were particularly adverse to the group project, do you think there is a big risk in letting him or her do an alternative assignment, i.e. would it make him/her feel even more self-conscious if the rest of the class can clearly see that they are not participating in it?
I'd personally give severely group-averse students the option of an alternative assignment and let them weigh the risk for themselves.
I taught a Confirmation class for teens at my synagogue, which included a small-group project. I had a couple of students who really balked at group work, so I tasked them as "stitchers", responsible for synthesizing the work of other group members to create the final presentation. That role was understood to have autonomy, explained as extra responsibility for not having to take part in the general group sessions. The students who took that job seemed happy to be able to contribute but without any discomfort. Just a thought. It may not work in every situation.
P.S.: I also allowed students to give individual presentations privately if they needed to, in front of me and two or three classmates of their choosing (or mine, if they wished to defer to my judgment). They had to approach me under their own steam if they wanted to do that, though. I was willing to accommodate social anxiety, but not to enable it by relieving students of all responsibility for getting their needs met. You can only do so much before it's counterproductive.