Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral
Depends who you see as being the one being friendly - the poster or the 'friendly' clicker.I always thought the "friendly" button could equivocate to "hug," myself.
Just throwing out the idea since a few times a virtual hug - platonic, from an Auntie or friend - seemed appropriate. ????
I'm on the fence. I've sometimes wanted to say something that was more supportive than Friendly with a different flavor than Like. I'm getting around it with Friendly and a comment. I actually struggle a bit with Optimistic, because I don't know if it will be understood as a very gentle form of disagreement (ie, "I think that's optimistic") or as an affirmation of positive energy (ie, "I feel optimistic myself on reading the post.") So I avoid it. Sorry to go off-topic, it's just been on my mind for a while.
Haha that made me laugh! The 'dry' informative button! Possibly also because I have clicked that quite a bit!! "Wow, that's really interesting" is far better!!!!I see 'Optimistic' simply as being supportive.. no negative energy there at all I always consider before clicking; I don't just 'Like' everything, I like the idea of people appreciating a 'Friendly' or whatever.
The one that bugs me is 'Informative' as it's a bit dry.. when I want to say "Wow, that's really interesting".
Just throwing out the idea since a few times a virtual hug - platonic, from an Auntie or friend - seemed appropriate. ????
It's generally accepted in AC culture that giving a "*HUGS*" (or however it's phrased) implies a chaste, contact-free virtual hug.I'd wondered if people that aren't comfortable with a physical hug would feel uncomfortable being given virtual hugs? and that perhaps they wouldn't identify with it as a postive thing? This got me thinking if there were some alternative to a virtual hug and I wondered if a 'cup of tea' button could work.
It's generally accepted in AC culture that giving a "*HUGS*" (or however it's phrased) implies a chaste, contact-free virtual hug.
So *hug* is just a fiction?
And ((hug)) is also fiction?
There is no contact implied by either?
This seems sad, to me.
No wonder I don't take hugs from the Hug Bank.
I don't want pretend hugs.
So *hug* is just a fiction?
And ((hug)) is also fiction?
There is no contact implied by either?
This seems sad, to me.
No wonder I don't take hugs from the Hug Bank.
I don't want pretend hugs.