• Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Private Member only forums for more serious discussions that you may wish to not have guests or search engines access to.
    • Your very own blog. Write about anything you like on your own individual blog.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral

Emotion and logic: are they more than normally separated in us compared to NTs?

While I would not question social pain: what I describe is not it. This isn't "I'm not getting invited because I'm not eating cake." If a diabetic turned down cake they would be sensible about their health. It would be the same for this lady.

She doesn't want to change something even though it is causing her severe difficulties. THAT's what I'm talking about.

Were it me, as much as I wouldn't want to change, my BRAIN would nag me until I did the sensible thing :)

Anyone else like that?
 
While I would not question social pain: what I describe is not it. This isn't "I'm not getting invited because I'm not eating cake." If a diabetic turned down cake they would be sensible about their health. It would be the same for this lady.

She doesn't want to change something even though it is causing her severe difficulties. THAT's what I'm talking about.

Were it me, as much as I wouldn't want to change, my BRAIN would nag me until I did the sensible thing :)

Anyone else like that?
OK.:D
 
Caetextia: from the Latin, caecus (blind) and contextus (context)

Left and right brain

As the intelligence system evolved in humans, our higher cortex became more complex and its left and right hemispheres developed specializations for different processes. Whilst maintaining the ability to interact with and complement each other, the hemispheres developed exponentially to support rational and contextual thinking. Human language and thought, for example, are primarily ordered through the left hemisphere, which sequences and structures information moment by moment in a way that fosters reason. But our logical thinking is informed, and also coloured, by associative thinking and imagination, both faculties that emanate from the right hemisphere. Whereas previously we had relied on instinctive responses to keep us safe, once the cortex developed in modern humans we became able consciously to review feelings and not just act on them. In other words, we could investigate what was going on around us with a more refined reasoning ability.

But when people are missing the mammalian ‘parallel processing’ template for handling multiple streams of information, they are forced to try and resolve problems by other means. If a person is left-brain dominant, we see Asperger’s behaviour as traditionally recognised: literal, logical, analytical reactions with difficulties in communication and empathy because of a severely diminished ability to think contextually. This happens because the left neocortex is itself ‘autistic’ — it doesn’t have access to the feelings that create context. But if a person is right-brain dominant and is missing the template for reading context, we suggest that caetextia may express itself through an undisciplined, very strong imagination. The right brain looks always for associations, so, without a strong left brain to moderate the myriad associations that the right brain makes, a person with caetextia cannot discipline them and check them out. The associations made are unlikely to be the right ones because, without access to a personal emotional history, they are not anchored in reality. The constant, undisciplined association-making can lead not only to inappropriate but often quite bizarre thoughts and behaviour.

Right-brained caetextia is caused by a lack of instinctive feelings to moderate the person’s thoughts and behaviour, leaving the mind to run free, making directionless, random associations. Because a right-brained caetextic person is more emotional, it may seem odd to suggest that their condition is due to a lack of instinctive feelings, but it is the lack of emotional instincts to discipline associations that give rise to problems. Scientists researching decision making have determined that it is emotion, fired by imagination, that prioritises decision making, not logic. “Emotions arise when events or outcomes are relevant for one’s concerns or preferences and they prioritise behaviour that acts in service of these concerns”7 (our italics). Both right- and left-brained caetextia result in black-and-white thinking. Indeed, when heavily stressed, we can all become temporarily caetextic: prone to black-and-white, crazy, irrational behaviour and faulty reasoning.

Rest of this here: Caetextia: a new definition of autistic and Asperger's behaviour
 
I'm right brained and left handed.:( i've always thought I was realy good at making associations. Once I reunited two sisters just from their speech pattern and basic facial bone structure.:)

I don't stare I analyze.:D It doesn't make it any less creepy though.:oops:
 
Last edited:
By the way, what I posted on caetextia isn't meant to be conclusive. It interested me in that it provided some explanation re: the 'neanderthal' theories. Like anything else in science, it's theory, not absolute evidence. Think that it might be more complicated than this interpretation of it.
 
Last edited:
I would say that it is mostly true when my emotions are ruled by instincts gone wild. At times while meditating, I can make associations that I feel at the time are quite profound. Not trying to, "toot my own horn", on the contrary. These ideas seem to come from somewhere other than my waking mind. I never make a connection to write it down and it fades quickly. I will be thinking it, then completely forget it. I am rarely able to get it back. I have a notebook next to my bed that has only one line in it, born in the belly of a lion, but I cant remember what they mean. I do remember it feeling very important. I'm sure it is a metaphor for something. Time will tell. :)
 
My biological last name is leonards. It may have something to do with that. I have been thinking a lot about my childhood recently.
 
I've noticed that my emotions and logic seem more separated than in most people, when I am reasoning it is not impaired by emotion, and on the rare occasions when I am free to become passionate without disastrous result I don't 'think' in what I consider to be the normal sense at all.

Do you think that this is true of yourself?

Oh yes. I agree completely. I gravitate between two extremes: (1) totally logical with no emotional attachment whatsoever; and (2) states/episodes of pure emotion (e.g., "meltdowns") when my emotions override my rational mind/logic.
 
Conversily, I read of a little girl who was 6, when she was fostered out, due to sexual abuse in her family. She was 7 when she arrived at school with splayed legs, which caught her teacher's attention and with horror discovered that she had two different sexual diseases and this was from her foster parents; so both of them had been abusing her too. I was in tears and shaking and just wanted to bring her to safety and felt very caught. No logic there for me.
Wtf
Did they kill these people?!? >:
 
I'm certain I don't use detachment or disassociation as a defence mechanism - in situations that would provoke empathy and drama in others.
I don't particularly feel much of anything because, well, I just don't.

A young child comes off his bike, injures himself and cries. That makes perfect sense. The nerve endings signal pain, there's a possibility the child may have frightened itself if falling off the bike isn't a regular occurrence.
I'd be more interested in flushing out the graze or checking for any other injuries and any repairs to the bike than a reassuring hug.


another example - my better half came hobbling into the kitchen earlier. Rigid body posture, altered breathing, short steps favouring the right side, but leaning slightly to his left. Look of concentration all over his face. No previous injury or long term conditions/issues.
If this were me I'd be all over it. Process of elimination and research to discover what I'm dealing with and then go ahead and do something about it. (nerve/muscle/skeletal?)
He said "I think I've hurt my back"
The back is a big area with many components. Why wasn't he doing anything about it? (discovering cause, pain management, heat/ice, massage, stretching out?
 

New Threads

Top Bottom