• Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Private Member only forums for more serious discussions that you may wish to not have guests or search engines access to.
    • Your very own blog. Write about anything you like on your own individual blog.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral

Can Aspies Be Codependents?

Considering that forming and maintaining healthy relationships is a challenge for so many of us, it reasonably follows that some of us will form pathological dynamics within our relationships.
Guilty as charged.
I was a complete mess in my younger years.

Codependency is a maladaptive way to try to feel a close human bond while simultaneously lacking something within (usually security and independence).
Agreed, but what if the other person reciprocates the same dependency?

Trying to feel close to others and failing is a feeling I am quite familiar with and I am pretty sure I am not alone. Sometimes, desperation can lead us straight into an unhealthy dynamic.
Absolutely.
 
Key signs of codependency include:

1. An excessive need to please others and gain approval
An excessive need to please others?
Hardly.
Just look at my posting history. :cool:
2. Difficulty setting and maintaining boundaries
This depends on context.
I like to defy social edicts, but I overwhelmingly respect the boundaries of others. :cool:

3. A tendency to take responsibility for others’ actions and emotions
Hell no!
I run like the wind away from adopting unnecessary responsibilities.
I am, after all, a Sigma, rather than an Alpha. :cool:

4. Neglecting one’s own needs in favor of others’
Once again, it is dependent on the context.
In a relationship, I value considering the feelings of my partner.
But this is self-serving because it is directly related to my self-esteem.
Hurting my partner damages me.
Self-interest is at the core of human psychology, after all. :cool:

5. Low self-esteem and a sense of worthlessness without external validation
Hardly.
I like who I am.
I have an internal locus of identity that doesn't need validation from others. :cool:

Autism and Codependency: Unraveling the Complex Relationship
 
Indeed.

There is no doubt I was codependent in my very first romantic relationship.
A very, very painful experience that drove me away from other potential romantic relationships for many years.
I'm glad that you were able to grow personal boundaries so that you could experience romantic relationships without getting mired once again in the morass of codependency, Jonn.
 
Agreed, but what if the other person reciprocates the same dependency?
As I understand it, a codependent relationship typically consists of a "giver" and a "taker," but sometimes there can be two "givers." Both parties see their value as being a caretaker to the other - their sense of worth comes from being needed. Any resultant feeling of closeness comes at the cost of destroying individualism - neither person knows who they are without the other and they don't remember how to meet their own needs. This makes it a very difficult relationship to get out of.
 
As I understand it, a codependent relationship typically consists of a "giver" and a "taker," but sometimes there can be two "givers." Both parties see their value as being a caretaker to the other - their sense of worth comes from being needed. Any resultant feeling of closeness comes at the cost of destroying individualism - neither person knows who they are without the other and they don't remember how to meet their own needs. This makes it a very difficult relationship to get out of.
So, do they usually stay together, not wanting "to get out of?"
 
Last edited:
So, do they usually stay, not wanting to get out of?
I don't know any statistics regarding that, but I can imagine that it is very hard. With codependency the end of the relationship can feel like the end of oneself – the person might as well be choosing annihilation. There is no sense of self, no sense of value, no sense of competence beyond the relationship. I reckon most people trapped in this dynamic stay a lot longer than they should, anyway.

Codependency is based on an imbalance of power, a lack of boundaries, and a detrimental sacrifice of identity. These relationships are really not sustainable in the end.

I don't know if you came across this when you were making your original post, but the idea of codependency arose from the field of substance abuse treatment. Originally, codependency was a description reserved for people who had a relationship with an addict (including non-romantic family relationships). The meaning has evolved and broadened since then.

History of codependency and how it has evolved over time - Psychotherapy Resources
 
I don't know any statistics regarding that, but I can imagine that it is very hard. With codependency the end of the relationship can feel like the end of oneself – the person might as well be choosing annihilation. There is no sense of self, no sense of value, no sense of competence beyond the relationship. I reckon most people trapped in this dynamic stay a lot longer than they should, anyway.

Codependency is based on an imbalance of power, a lack of boundaries, and a detrimental sacrifice of identity. These relationships are really not sustainable in the end.

I don't know if you came across this when you were making your original post, but the idea of codependency arose from the field of substance abuse treatment. Originally, codependency was a description reserved for people who had a relationship with an addict (including non-romantic family relationships). The meaning has evolved and broadened since then.

History of codependency and how it has evolved over time - Psychotherapy Resources
When I was in training to become a Licensed Chemical Dependency Counselor, we studied codependency. The addicts, including alcoholics, stay in their addiction because they have chief enablers. In codependency, the addict always has to have his/her chief enabler. If the addict loses a codependent, chief enabler, s/he looks for until s/he finds a new chief enabler. An addict does not survive without a chief enabler, doesn't survive without being in a codependent relationship. My mother enabled my father to remain in his alcoholism even though he went to AA meetings and she went to Alanon meetings.

I never heard either one of them talking about "working the Twelve Steps." And, for sure, my father never verbalized working Step Nine, "making amends" with those whom he'd harmed----his kids whom he physically, verbally, and emotionally abused. Dad never told any of his kids, including me, that he was sorry for his abusive behaviors. And Mother never told us kids that she was sorry for not protecting us. And we, of course, became Adult Children of Alcoholics (ACOAs). There's a Twelve Step program for us, too.

The chief enabler (now, I mean, generally speaking) doesn't have a sense of self. The chief enabler hasn't ever asked him/herself, "Who am I?" There's no self-concept nor self-awareness; therefore, there are no boundaries between the chief enabler and the one whom the chief enabler is enabling. There can't be! And the chief enabler doesn't understand the concept of "taking care" of one's self because there is no self to take care of.

It takes a lot of courage and hard work on the chief enabler's part to challenge and then extinguish being a chief enabler, moving past codependent relationships. My mother would deny that she enabled my father staying active in his alcoholism. She denied being a chief enabler just as he denied being an alcoholic. She was proud of taking care of, enabling him. She thrived on her keeping him dependent upon her for his every need. Keeping him dependent gave her meaning and purpose. She had none for herself. So, my parents were an excellent example of codependent living. Codependency always requires a dependent person being taken care of by a chief enabler.
 
Last edited:
When I was in training to become a Licensed Chemical Dependency Counselor, we studied codependency. The addicts, including alcoholics, stay in their addiction because they have chief enablers. In codependency, the addict always has to have his/her chief enabler. If the addict loses a codependent, chief enabler, s/he looks for until s/he finds a new chief enabler. An addict does not survive without a chief enabler, doesn't survive without being in a codependent relationship. My mother enabled my father to remain in his alcoholism even though he went to AA meetings and she went to Alanon meetings.

I never heard either one of them talking about "working the Twelve Steps." And, for sure, my father never verbalized working Step Nine, "making amends" with those whom he'd harmed----his kids whom he physically, verbally, and emotionally abused. Dad never told any of his kids, including me, that he was sorry for his abusive behaviors. And Mother never told us kids that she was sorry for not protecting us. And we, of course, became Adult Children of Alcoholics (ACOAs). There's a Twelve Step program for us, too.

The chief enabler (now, I mean, generally speaking) doesn't have a sense of self. The chief enabler hasn't ever asked him/herself, "Who am I?" There's no self-concept nor self-awareness; therefore, there are no boundaries between the chief enabler and the one whom the chief enabler is enabling. There can't be! And the chief enabler doesn't understand the concept of "taking care" of one's self because there is no self to take care of.

It takes a lot of courage and hard work on the chief enabler's part to challenge and then extinguish being a chief enabler, moving past codependent relationships. My mother would deny that she enabled my father staying active in his alcoholism. She denied being a chief enabler just as he denied being an alcoholic. She was proud of taking care of, enabling him. She thrived on her keeping him dependent upon her for his every need. Keeping him dependent gave her meaning and purpose. She had none for herself. So, my parents were an excellent example of codependent living. Codependency always requires a dependent person being taken care of by a chief enabler.
Tough on the people in the relationship, but so much worse for the children to endure. 💚
 
I was actually thinking in terms of a loved one dying. 🤔
Depends upon the situation. My grandfather took care of my grandmother through 15-20 years of dementia before she died. My wife's father did the same with her mother. We had some quiet conversations afterward. In both cases, after that initial grief, a huge weight was lifted off of them, they bounced back quickly and were more vibrant than they had been in decades. So, there's those situations.
 
Tough on the people in the relationship, but so much worse for the children to endure. 💚
It takes a lot of psychotherapy to undo the abuses of codependency. It takes a lot of courageous, self-looking to admit being a codependent and then working to rid one's self of self-destructive codependency behaviors. We had an expression in the chemical dependency hospital where I worked. To be effective in evolving past codependency, one needs to be "Honest, Open, and Willing." A day or so ago, I came across something that I think is a universal truth, at least among us human beings. "Evolution, evolving, only comes via suffering." I think there's a lot of self-evolving going on with members of AspiesCentral.com. . . .
 

New Threads

Top Bottom