Absolutely, a lot of misunderstanding stems from the expectation that aspies should / would take exactly the same view, judgement / priority as the NT on the social cue or norm, or feeling or anything else. But aspies are seeing the situation differently, are approaching this situation from a very different perspective and their appraisal of the situation is different.
Basically it is the issue of aspies disagreeing with the NT appraisal of the situation, reaching different conclusions, equally valid.
The NT majority does not see and understand the rationale for aspies appraisal of the situation, but they do reject or ostracise the expression of it. It is also and often the issue of a minority group.
Language is also a problem. It became a stereotype that people repeat without challenging the implications.
And there's often a frustration from our side. Being aware of it, especially the social pressure (is consequences) of a mistake.
We can usually take a good guess as the expectations of social interaction.
The consequences can be fraught, as we are aware of 'group judgment'
A bit like Kafkas book the trial. Where the main character is judged and without his knowledge of there even being a trial.
But, I digress.