• Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Private Member only forums for more serious discussions that you may wish to not have guests or search engines access to.
    • Your very own blog. Write about anything you like on your own individual blog.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral

Any one else here obsessed with physics?

I like Leonard, liked his work over the years, gave up on string theory years ago as I could not visualize it rest of Leonard's stuff I could, great lecture at U of T which he described his stuff I got immediately.knew he was right .To me the guy to follow currently is Neil Turok.

 
Last edited:
I like Sean, do not like his belief in multi universes, To me time runs concurrently forward and backwards or is emergent.


 
Thought this was interesting sort of fits with what I can visualize. matter and antimatter exist concurrently what separates them is slight difference in time concurrently going forward and backward. I can see it in my head explaining what I see difficult. Unless you see what I see.



 
Last edited:
The quantum world is bizarre in macroscopic terms. I suspected it was a question of time that scientists would find out something like that.
 
Once you can sort of visualize quantum mechanics not so bizarre. describing what I see to others is like describing a picture in great detail, others will not see what I see. I have a painting of a sailing ship over my TV dad bought it for my mother before they had a family I suspect anybody seeing this the brush strokes may see cheap Walmart painting of a sailing ship worth a few hundred dollars actually it is incredibly detailed looks like it was painted by a very accomplished painter.probably worth thousands. The brush strokes are short very deliberate unless you see it yourself you can even imagine how much detail, As far as I know the painter may now 70 years later be a master painter, or a hack selling cheap paintings then. Short of showing others the painting, you will never see what I see.
 
Last edited:
I don't personally think that quantum mechanics is objectively bizarre or bizarre to me. It was a literary description meaning that it defies "common sense". It's pure mathematics and perfectly logical - moreso than the macrosopic world.

As for the ability to visualise. I'm not sure if this ability is that rare among (competent) engineers. There have and the most detailed been studies that engineers have the best spatial imagination - it's a predisposition that makes it easy to become an engineer. It also overlaps with autism.

Detailed imagination also escapes verbal description, it's a different format.
 
I like Roger 7or 8 sigma IQ also 7 or 8 sigma visual thinker. no one else comes close. Won Nobel prize could see him getting Abel prize. What an interesting conversation conjectured that Bell's theorem could be resolved through time going in reverse could be variable. something I see.


 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

New Threads

Top Bottom