• Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Private Member only forums for more serious discussions that you may wish to not have guests or search engines access to.
    • Your very own blog. Write about anything you like on your own individual blog.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral

Answer a QUESTION with a QUESTION

A really clumsy person could begin to fall off long before they get to the edge, so don't you need to take that into consideration?
 
What if they want to try hanging from ropes while clumsily abseiling down a cliff face?
 
Since it is rare to find an intentionally clumsy person, wouldn't the safest bet be "stupid"?
 
Doesn't it seem like there should be an inverse relationship between stupidity and safety, where an increase in stupidity produces a decrees in safety?
 
If a more stupid person and a less stupid person are locked in a room together, who is safer?
 

New Threads

Top Bottom