• Feeling isolated? You're not alone.

    Join 20,000+ people who understand exactly how your day went. Whether you're newly diagnosed, self-identified, or supporting someone you love – this is a space where you don't have to explain yourself.

    Join the Conversation → It's free, anonymous, and supportive.

    As a member, you'll get:

    • A community that actually gets it – no judgment, no explanations needed
    • Private forums for sensitive topics (hidden from search engines)
    • Real-time chat with others who share your experiences
    • Your own blog to document your journey

    You've found your people. Create your free account

Answer a QUESTION with a QUESTION

A really clumsy person could begin to fall off long before they get to the edge, so don't you need to take that into consideration?
 
What if they want to try hanging from ropes while clumsily abseiling down a cliff face?
 
Since it is rare to find an intentionally clumsy person, wouldn't the safest bet be "stupid"?
 
Doesn't it seem like there should be an inverse relationship between stupidity and safety, where an increase in stupidity produces a decrees in safety?
 
If a more stupid person and a less stupid person are locked in a room together, who is safer?
 
Top Bottom