• Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Private Member only forums for more serious discussions that you may wish to not have guests or search engines access to.
    • Your very own blog. Write about anything you like on your own individual blog.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral

HFA? LFA? Whatever

  • Author Author Geordie
  • Create date Create date
  • Blog entry read time Blog entry read time 1 min read
The people with lower functioning autism (LFA) literally 'rot to death' from what I understand, as I have a neighbor with LFA.

It's not that we people high functioning autism (HFA) aren't disabled enough, we ARE disabled, we NEED services, we need societal support all around, from a broad base, so we should focus on getting the services instead of crying foul.

HFAs are perceived as the same as LFAs out there in some societies. Perhaps we have a commonality that is really startling to NT eyes. The outcome for all people on the Autism Spectrum is the same - unemployment and lack of friends, due to the lack of socialization skills.

A fellow Singaporean friend says, LFAs are treated preferentially.

Who says LFAs are treated preferentially? We HFAs treat them like **** because we think they inhibit our abilities, and this is bad.

It is precisely we HFAs, like LFAs, share the same deficits (in different extents, though) that impair our ability to function in human interactions, that do not fit into their flow. It isn't our fault, our parents even did so much to make us improve, but we still have those deficits anyway. Don't we look into other strengths, like say, our ability to think independently, instead of focusing the empty and nonsensesical comments of how other people 'prosecute' us?

Indeed, without societal support or parents' unwavering support for ASDs, we'll never see miracles.

Also, I think Aspies and Auties, while working hard to improve their social functioning, should accept that we are all special people, each and every one of us.

Comments

The big thing that annoys me is that there's a notion of "enough" in the defintion somewhere.

"Enough" or "not enough" is a really variable term... it's not clear and rather loose by itself. And that's what governments can hide behind.

Is someone who "suffers" form HFA less disabled than someone with LFA? I don't think so... it's just a different way for either of those people to deal with everyday life. Problems to an HFA person might not be stuff LFA people stumble upon. It's actually a situation where people should be assessed individually and especially not just by whatever label they carry. The concept of LFA vs. HFA is silly in itself I think. Just look at the complications someone has in daily life and work from there.

But more and more I'm a bit into the entire "scene" of assessments and hearing problems from people on the spectrum in my social group, all I'm hearing is that LFA is the way to go. Which actually makes me think... LFA is a bit clearer as well as it's easier for the government to get services for. I mean, over here, we have companies running primarily on disabled people... it revolves about manual labor, a lot if assembly line like. That's where the notion of low intelligence comes in. Yes, these people need guidance, but they don't really need guidance in terms of "intelligence" as such... a lot of those people working there either don't express themselves or don't deal with stuff like "this job is making me feel depressed". However, look at people on the HFA spectrum, dealing with more clearly defined sensory issues, some have a degree and a fair share aren't really interested in something like medication. That's where there's no service because it requires more therapy and guidance to get those people out of the red zone, keep them happy, busy and make them feel like they're doing something worthwhile.

Mind you, I'm not looking down on anyone doing any job nor suffering from LFA or people that are generally on the lower end of the intelligence spectrum (for what that spectrum is worth anyway). They're humans as well, but I do notice that quite often that the "smarter" you are, the more you stumble upon specific problems, that aren't put in a blueprint for autism in general in our case. But this is all based on my experience of course...

So with that, what's "enough"? I think that the effects that certain "societal demands" put upon someone, should judge how impaired you are, especially if it's a non-physical thing. Afterall, physical handicaps are those which you can look into more easily quite often. Physical disabilities, how bad they might be, are quite often things companies can look into, especially since it's sometimes a small adaption. Mental issues are something you're usually carrying around 24/7 (few exceptions I guess). And as such they pose a constant "complication". I don't know if one should actually gauge those complications as such in terms of "enough".

A final note; I sometimes think society is not fully aware about the full spectrum of complications it brings. Example?

I personally rarely engage in physical contact with strangers. I don't shake hands with random people. It's something I just refuse. Imagine I had a job where this was part of it, and that I got this job because of a government program. Chances are people will look at me like "the weird guy" and it might even come down to them firing me and hiring someone else because... we don't want "that quirky guy". Because I have a personal issue of sorts going on, this will pose a problem eventually. Imagine you'd be for part in either Human resources and/or PR... it's where some things might become part of the job which might bear a sensory issue. And unless I overcome (and with that, WANT to overcome) such small issues which people will look into as big issues, that already gives me a small note added to my career in general.

Say I can't deal with noise issues. Sounds a too loud. Well, let's face it... good luck with any job. Again, personal experience. I can't even deal with the beeps at the checkout in supermarkets. I'm not even going to start about factories and machines that do part of the labor there. So in essence, what I'd need would be job that's devoid of sound in the general sense. No phones, no people talking, no machines around, no nothing... if I put this out at the employment agency, and I can actually show them that I do have certain "issues" (as my formal diagnosis perhaps), that will make my functioning subpar, there's no reason for them to get me employed in that sense... I'm a pain in the rear. And yet... it's a problem many of us might stumble upon.

The fact that I can make my own sandwich doesn't mean that I'm also qualified to earn my sandwich in any way possible...

And let's put something straight for everyone telling me "you're using your autism as an excuse"... how about "no... I'm not using it as an excuse, I use it as a tool to get my issues taken seriously. If I have my issues and no diagnosis I'm a pain in the rear... there's no difference for me personally... issues are issues, it just happens that society nowadays actually wants proof of whatever issues one has, and that's why I carry my medical file around". Having an official diagnosis is just another thing society wants in their claim that everyone and everything has to be responsible for something. Yet if I claim that I have reasons for this, and thus I know why and how I'm responsible and that I'm willing to meet in the middle... that's where people are like "... but we can't deal with those responsibilities", and it comes back to you... the end-user... or the aspie, to claim full responsibility for things you might not even be able to control.

Control you say? How about sound issues. A sensible sollution would be "wear earplugs" yet I have had job applications where they told me "earplugs are NOT allowed". How's that for no control... it's actually them telling you "You're not allowed to cope with your issues on our turf".

But I got onto a tangent here. Oh well... I'll leave it at that for now
 
It's alright. Indeed, this ambiguous functioning level confuses more than help people living under the diagnosis. So we'll just work on whatever we can work on, especially our strengths.
 

Blog entry information

Author
Geordie
Read time
1 min read
Views
1,047
Comments
2
Last update

More entries in General

  • May 7th 2025 [TW]
    I want to start this post positively because lately I've been a bit negative, but the...
  • Father
    So. My Dad, who I don't talk to, is visiting tomorrow for both mine and my Uncle's birthday...
  • Turtle Trails
    Does anyone else seem to have a turtle trail that they follow. By that I mean a radius of...
  • writing
    In 7th grade, I got a typewriter for Christmas (because my handwriting was so bad and a teacher...
  • Spring is on its way
    It's been a while since I postede pictures from any of my walks, it isn't because I haven't been...

More entries from Geordie

Share this entry

Top Bottom