Peace;53614 said:
I am sorry, but I don't even know where the politicians came in.
It's in my belief that they came in somewhere around this:
Peace;53585 said:
Each of us has to decide on what we believe, and I have believed that the Free Trade Agreement and fluoride were both bad ideas, even when conventional wisdom said otherwise.
Again, I don't mean to make this personal. Also, if this is just the matter of misunderstanding, that's fine and I'm sorry about the interruption.
But. FTA is a political pact, which might have some grounds on scientific observations in fields of statistics, but most of all it's something politicians came up with, and doesn't really have much to do with science or scientists itself. I was just interested in how does that break any affection with god.
Or if it was meant as an analogy about being able to act in what one believes in, that's quite interesting. As most of us seem to agree, it's okay for someone think how they wish, also about religion, but fighting against actual facts might not be very effective after all. Trading agreements wont vanish because some won't like them. I only mean, that it's not quite felicitous reference.
pacman;53631 said:
I'm sorry, but this is a fundamentally wrong sentence.
Is this just a mention about bad grammar in here? As in "None has rights to do and have everything they want, but they can want to do and have anything they feel like."
Just paying some attention on details in order to be able to go on with this. Personally I can't go far with assumptions.