Fun fact: it's quite hard to do research on male pr0n use in the 21st century because it's extremely difficult to find people for the "never used" control group.It is modern feminism that has caused the issue to be honest though it is a knock on effect.
Pornography is not the element that causes isolation, but rather is the result of the long tern isolation. Pornography is the tool used by men to avoid any genuine interaction with a woman. A man who looks at pornography has already given up hope in ever getting a date. It is why he goes down that route.
On point:
Pr0n "addiction" (like "sex addiction") is possible, and there are serious people who believe that "sedation" due to pr0n is a thing (AFAIK this hasn't been tested yet, but it will be).
But that also demonstrates that saying "all pr0n use is bad" obviously cannot be true. There are a lot of people who say that (oddly, some of them are serious people) but when it's "unwrapped" it turns out to be yet another case of "some people can't control their use of something" (where there are a lot of things that can be abused).
It's certainly the case that, like e.g. alcohol, pr0n seems to be bad for younger people (**), and some proportion of adult XX's can get "trapped" by it.
So along with the Captain's excellent point about being careful about the direction of cause and effect (and indirectly, of ignoring possible "confounding factors"),
... it's essential to provide real data that shows the proportion of adults who are actually harmed by pr0n use (split by "damaged as kids", and "started as (more or less) adults").
Without numbers it's not possible to draw any useful, actionable conclusions.
FWIW, despite the pointlessness of current large-scale discussions, I think there are some genuine issues that should be addressed. But it won't be easy.
And I'm truly looking forward to learning the consequences for the approx 1 000 000 American (USA) women between 18 and 25 with OF accounts /lol. What they do isn't illegal, but they are certainly complicit, and more harmful to others than their consumers. Perhaps a 3-digit "Scarlet Number"?
(**)
Which means parents who don't control their children's access to sources of these things are a major cause of the downstream issues.
Last edited: