• Feeling isolated? You're not alone.

    Join 20,000+ people who understand exactly how your day went. Whether you're newly diagnosed, self-identified, or supporting someone you love – this is a space where you don't have to explain yourself.

    Join the Conversation → It's free, anonymous, and supportive.

    As a member, you'll get:

    • A community that actually gets it – no judgment, no explanations needed
    • Private forums for sensitive topics (hidden from search engines)
    • Real-time chat with others who share your experiences
    • Your own blog to document your journey

    You've found your people. Create your free account

Westall incident

Nan Madol didn't use large pieces of rock. It's made of columnar basalt, which was available on Pohnpei:
List of places with columnar jointed volcanics - Wikipedia

It's impressive for the scale of the construction, but not for the scale of the components.
Keep in mind archaeologists claim locals used canoes to carry up to 90 tonne
Nan Madol Ruins – Pohnpei Eco-Adventure Guide
And how did they erect such massive stones in elevated positions? again coconut fibre is a rather lazy method to explain this away
Gunung Padang is a pyramid in Indonesia could date back 20,000–25,000 years
Gunung Padang - Wikipedia
The site is composed of up to 50,000 hexagonal columnar basalt blocks, some of which weigh around 650 pounds ( 0.3 tonnes) and others as much as 880 pounds (0.4space 0.4 tonnes).
25,000 yrs ago how do you mobilize hunter gatherers who spend the whole day to hunt food to work day and night to create an engineering masterpiece?
 
I saw a video a few weeks ago that claimed there was a branch of the Nile that ran close to Giza, which would explain why they were built there. And they were capable of building canals to connect to/from the river and quarries and building sites.

There's still discussion about the finer details of how they got the materials up the larger pyramids, but that's about efficiency. It clearly wasn't magic.
Ask yourself what's the heaviest stone you could carry on a wooden raft? I know archaeologists claim up to 90 tonnes, but has this been demonstrated using a replica ancient barge? answer - no. And even then what about 1000 tonne obelisks?. I'm sorry but archaeologists also engage in far fetched speculation too.
 
Ask yourself what's the heaviest stone you could carry on a wooden raft? I know archaeologists claim up to 90 tonnes, but has this been demonstrated using a replica ancient barge? answer - no. And even then what about 1000 tonne obelisks?. I'm sorry but archaeologists also engage in far fetched speculation too.

There's a 331 tonne obelisk in St Peter's Square that was brought to Rome in 37 CE on low-tech wooden ships.
Nobody thinks there's anything strange about that, because there are records of ancient Romans doing many things on that scale.

Building large river barges is much easier then building large sea-going ships, because they don't have to deal with waves. The don't need deep keels, nor do the sides need large curved ribs like a sailing ship.

And while 100 tonnes is a lot to lift vertically, it's not that much to move on water. Barges for a 100 tonne rectangular block probably wouldn't need to be longer than 30 meters.
There's a record of an Egyptian one from 1500 BC here:
List of longest wooden ships - Wikipedia
but the upper end of that (95 meters) is big for a simply constructed barge.

A 1000 tonne single-piece Obelisk would be a challenge for low-tech societies, even a well-organized one like ancient Egypt.
Wikipedia says there's an unfinished one that big still in the quarry. It's more than twice the original weight of the next largest one. They may have believed they could move it, but they never proved it :)

Or the construction guys might have been told by a Pharaoh to make him an even bigger one, and got started even if they knew it would be too heavy. They could probably make a reasonable estimate of the weight. But back then it might have been difficult to explain the consequences of making one that big without being executed /lol.

Given that they stopped, it's even possible they got started, then someone who could count came along and explained that they'd have trouble moving it using their existing infrastructure.
 
25,000 yrs ago how do you mobilize hunter gatherers who spend the whole day to hunt food to work day and night to create an engineering masterpiece?

AFAIK nothing on that scale was ever made by hunter-gatherers, nor has anything like that been dated to 25K years ago. This place is interesting:
Göbekli Tepe - Wikipedia
(about 12K years old)

* The Egyptians were building quite big things 5000+ years ago, but they were already well organized then.
* Gunung Padang has been dated to Roman times (**)
* Nan Madol was started in Viking times (**)
(**) Those two were built at a lower tech level than the comparisons (Roman, Viking) OFC. But much of the world was well past simple hunter-gather societies by then.

Note that columnar basalt is a very convenient building material, ideal for moderately organized low-tech societies.
There's no need for large-scale stone shaping because its natural cross-section is hexagonal, with nice flat sides.

Any group with easy access to a source if it would use it for construction, starting with simple structures (dwellings, storage, etc), and scale up as they developed skills and techniques.

People always take advantage of available, exploitable resources. It would be unnatural if they didn't.

And how did they erect such massive stones in elevated positions? again coconut fibre is a rather lazy method to explain this away
You're underestimating the quality of coir rope, and possibly the ease with which it can be made.

And perhaps missing something equally important: rope is extremely scalable, because it's easy to share a large load across many separate ropes. Coir rope was use for rigging in medium-tech wooden ships for centuries (this is an indication of reliability and strength vs size).

The site is composed of up to 50,000 hexagonal columnar basalt blocks, some of which weigh around 650 pounds ( 0.3 tonnes) and others as much as 880 pounds (0.4space 0.4 tonnes).

Given access to wood and stone axes (or better) to shape it, raising columnar stones at these weights would be easy, and while good rope would be handy (and they probably had access to it), it wouldn't be necessary.

Not by building a crane of course: You lift them with levers.

Get a 3-meter-long lever under one end (dig a small hole for the first lift, lift it 20 cm or so, and put a block under it. Do the same at the other end.
Repeat.
A gang of 4 guys could do this at a few minutes per vertical meter.

Pieces of the right kind of wood the size of railway sleepers are easily enough to hold up a multi-tonne object, and you can build the supports quite high.
Modern jacks are easier of course, but wood is actually a great material for the supports.

I've done this (as past of a project that lifted and moved a building about the weight of a 3/4 bedroom house).
We used modern lifting and horizontal jacks of course, but the supports were actual old railway sleepers.
We lifted it high enough to get a suitable truck underneath it for transport, so perhaps 1.5 meters.

The building was somewhere between 5 and 20 tonnes (we needed to know to get a big enough truck, but it was a very long time ago and I've forgotten - probably low double-digits).

This is why I don't see 1- or 2-tonne objects as being difficult for low-tech societies, and a few 10's of tonnes as being possible if they can get a fairly big work gang together.

Up in the hundreds of tonnes, you'd need a lot of prep and organization.

IMO 1000+ tonnes would be possible, but very difficult even for the Romans (who had metal tools, and were very well organized).

For example, at 1000 tonnes, even raising the object vertically a meter or two with a more sophisticated and scaled-up version of the leverage approach I described would be very difficult.

OFC you can lift and move really big objects by e.g. building a boat around them, constructing a big enough pool, connecting it to a canal/river, and floating the whole system.

But you'd definitely prefer to do the same thing with ten conveniently sized modules rather than one huge object.
Big stone pillars were made that way, and some have stood for thousands of years.
 
Last edited:
There's a 331 tonne obelisk in St Peter's Square that was brought to Rome in 37 CE on low-tech wooden ships.
Nobody thinks there's anything strange about that, because there are records of ancient Romans doing many things on that scale.
Yes, if Caligula was able to bring it to Rome in 37CE then why not the Egyptians right? Problem is this is based on stories about 900 men working day and night with ropes and pulleys and 3 x giant ships both of which were sunk in Rome's harbour. Ships were described as "giant" purpose built for this one exercise and never repeated before or again. Is it possible Caligula made this up?
 
It is plausible alien abductions are a form of secret human experimentation.
IMO, it is more than plausible:
MK-ULTRA is a proven American and Canadian transgression against human decency, period.
Freedom of information will give you hard facts about that.

Some argue that MK-ULTRA was not illegal, and yet the government agencies frantically destroyed almost all evidence of their nefarious and "ungodly" experimentation on innocent, ordinary citizens across the world.
Investigative efforts were hampered by CIA director Richard Helms's order that all MKUltra files be destroyed in 1973; the Church Committee and Rockefeller Commission investigations relied on the sworn testimony of direct participants and on the small number of documents that survived Helms's order.<a href="MKUltra - Wikipedia"><span></span></a>

Take a look at Wiki says:
MKUltra<a href="MKUltra - Wikipedia"><span>[</span>a<span>]</span></a> was an illegal human experimentation program designed and undertaken by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to develop procedures and identify drugs that could be used in altering human behavior.
Project MKUltra began in 1953 and was halted in 1973. MKUltra used numerous methods to manipulate its subjects' mental states and brain functions, such as the covert administration of high doses of psychoactive drugs (especially LSD) and other chemicals without the subjects' consent. Additionally, other methods beyond chemical compounds were used, including electroshocks,> hypnosis, sensory deprivation, isolation, verbal and sexual abuse, and other forms of torture.

Consider:
The NAZI mind control experiments.
They were also sanctioned by the Nazi government of the time, yet you would be hard-pressed to find modern-day citizens considering them anything other than reprehensible and morally corrupt.
Are these the standards that anyone these days is willing to support?
Of course not.

FYI:
Are you aware of: "Project Paperclip"?
Project Paperclip was not given carte blanche. Experts selected by the program had to be screened by the JIOA, and, according to official policy, anyone who had been more than a nominal member of the Nazi Party was to be excluded. The ethical and moral concerns of the project were immediately obvious to many within the U.S. government.
What is quoted in bold above is absolute crap.
It may have been "official Policy", but it wasn't adhered to, as can be seen through the creation of the MK-Ultra Program.

experimentation directly on humans is severely limited due to most countries being international signatories to ethical and moral frameworks involving human and animal experimentation. So I would not be surprised if people are being abducted and it's now camouflaged, covertly as "aliens".
You should be more than "not surprised".
The evidence is looking directly in your face.

This is how the real world works, Neo.
Take the red or the blue pill.
The choice is yours.

Morpheus out. :cool:
 
Get a 3-meter-long lever under one end (dig a small hole for the first lift, lift it 20 cm or so, and put a block under it. Do the same at the other end.
Repeat.
A gang of 4 guys could do this at a few minutes per vertical meter.
Ok so it might be possible to come up with low tech solutions (I'm not an engineer) using our 21st century brains. However in ancient times it's also a question of mobilisation of men and resources to tackle an overwhelming building problem. the further back in time you go (Gobleke tepe or Gunung Padam) the harder it is to understand the motivation. Also can you create complex constructions without understanding mathematics and engineering rather than trial and error? remember in Gobleke tepe (for example) the builders were hunter gatherers. would they really have had time to sit around a communal fire after a tough day of hunting and come up with complex calculus and division of labour?

Going back to ancient Egypt, transportation and construction is only one dilemma. You also have cutting. Here's where it gets interesting. According to conventional archaeology stone tools were used to pound both monuments and artifacts into exquisite highly symmetrical works of art. Problem is nobody can replicate the cutting executed without modern lathes, power tools, 3D printers or lasers.

Not suggesting they needed aliens but ancient people managed to create works of building and art that certainly need more careful examination.
 
I just came across this video.
Part of the content is relevant to this discussion about faking up UFO propaganda.

MSN

I will add some screen dumps here:

Fake UFO propaganda 2.webp
Fake UFO prpaganda 5.webp
Fake UFO prpaganda 4.webp
Fake UFO prpaganda 3.webp
 
^^^ Yeah but aren't these select few Rogan brings on professional grifters who he knows bring in clicks.
there's astronomy professors from Harvard
https://avi-loeb.medium.com/the-scientific-revolution-of-interstellar-objects-b8d9278bc05f
Psychiatry professors from Harvard
NOVA Online/Kidnapped by UFOs/John Mack
Medical professors from Stanford
Interview - Dr. Garry Nolan — M E R G E D
astronomy professors from Stockholm and Vanderbilt Universities
Unexpected patterns in historical astronomical observations - Stockholm University
All of whom say the same thing - Something unknown is here
 
Last edited:
"The Great Pyramid is literally impossible."
Therefore, the construction must have involved aliens. ;)

 
Parts of the video are.

But the ideas aren't - it's standard "pyramidiot" content.

There are actually still genuine questions about how they built it efficiently to that scale. Videos about that are often interesting, and they seem to be getting closer and closer to solid answers.

This guy is cool:
Wally Wallington - Wikipedia
He demonstrates interesting low tech ways to work with large, heavy objects. For example AFAIK he independently (re)discovered the trick for "rolling" square-section objects using tracks like the one I think I linked for bicycles with square wheels.
Here's one example video (only 2:19 long):

I also like the "internal ramp" theory (there's at least one video on YouTube).
BTW I'm not claiming these ideas match what the pyramid builders actually did, but they're realistic and interesting.

Here's another video from Wallington. It shows horizontal "block rolling" at 19:40.
Some of the other techniques are equally clever.
 
Last edited:

New Threads

Top Bottom