Topics of Interest to Me

[InnerFlameStuff]

im also nervous about talking irl. im not an academic. and i post here because i dont feel like im under as much pressure. im not even sure where you go with ideas like mine. arxiv is cool and all but im not at a point where im that confident. a lot of this is just trying to be organized with my ideas. and some of it is revisions of ideas. like a lot of my earlier logic is wrong i had to correct it. long story short. i just feel more comfortable here than many places

 

[UFO]

does this make more sense?

Yes, it is more focused explanation by my opinion.

are you familiar with laplace? im not sure how much you know already vs what you dont know. so its hard to know where to start

Remotely familiar, if I would be interested I probably could restore it quickly to my mind.

But I'd rather stick with generic level of physics, without going to actual math details. I mean that physics is not my field of interest, and my attitude towards any math has varied between dislike and hatred. So I have avoided to learn both physics and math unless I have needed it as a tool to something that I am really interested of. For example, I learned matrix calculation and vectors years before interest calculation, because I wanted to create a 3D rendering engine during grade school. But I would have never learned matrices and theory of optics if it wouldn't have been that 3D graphics engine and an interest in low level GPU programming.

I find your project interesting more in sense what it does, rather than how it does it. In other words, I was initially confused of what were you doing and why, because you were showing just how you do it, and I wasn't sure if that was your intention. It is getting more clear now.

What I am trying to say here, is that keep doing what you are now doing, and you don't have to waste your time trying to explain me the detail level. I am interested seeing the final result, though.

i post here because i dont feel like im under as much pressure

Stay that way and don't feel any pressure. If you do start feeling that (for example, because of me repeating "what do you mean?", which is something that also NTs consider uncomfortable) tell that immediately so we know to stop it immediately.

 

[Rodafina]

this also includes lots of process cycling. like load balancing. are you familiar with laplace? im not sure how much you know already vs what you dont know. so its hard to know where to start

I'm not sure if you're talking to me or not. I would fall into the category of "know nothing" about this stuff, but I think there are others here on the forums that certainly do.

Thanks for making the effort. I may not understand fully, but I understand better.

 

[Crabcore]

my advice would be to study biology, not just prgramming.

I see a lot of references to MIDI in there. Nice touch; do you prefer it over OSC?

I love this cryptic / madness vibe you have going on here. It reminds me to never stop believing in the innate secrets of the universe, even if it's really just a black hole full of nothing that we pretend is real. This is an artistic marvel, imho. I could stare at it forever, never understand any of it, and still enjoy the experience.

Do you consider yourself an artist of this sort of thing, or maybe an architect? I made a few ciphers a little while ago that stumped a few people; do you think you could decode them?

 

[InnerFlameStuff]

 

[InnerFlameStuff]

the antikythera mechanism out computes modern computers in terms of geometry by quite a lot. the guy who replicated it used metrics instead of old world loose fit approximate. things that have a lot of moving parts like this work fine IF YOU DO IT RIGHT. but the point is give this turing complete operations and a feedback to digital processors and yeah. it basically enables quantum scale calculations very cheap. this has been sitting in humanity's playbook untouched