AsheSkyler
Feathered Jester
I have a theory on why some of us don't enjoy small talk.
Obviously, the main dislike for many is that small talk is highly focused on your social skills and socializing tends to not be our strong point. Many find it pointless and useless, and arguably at best its function is to bond with another human being so that they are likely to help you in the future should you need it. That's a given.
So how many of you hate small talk because it's boring and predictable and not worth the spoons to engage in it? Or that it's just way too shallow and needs a bit more depth?
I've noticed on a lot of forums regarding various interests I have, I hesitate to make small talk or start a thread because I already know how it'll pan out and don't want to waste the time to verify it and hope it'll go differently. Say for example, a question of "do you like dogs", you're probably going to have most people say they like dogs, a few who don't and likely due to shedding, chewing, or bad breath, you might get one that's gaga for dogs, and maybe a loony that claims dogs are demon spawn. Same principals in person. If you try to narrow the question about asking about a specific breed, odds are the person you're talking to will nod and smile and say they used to own that breed or their friend does, they may have a mild dislike of it, and if they don't know the breed then they'll just give you a confused smile and stay quiet. That's it. No depth, end of discussion. You could hold a better conversation with one of those Magic 8 Balls.
And that's just your average person. If you talk to a person who is... uh, ahem, "intellectually challenged", you're likely to end up confused or frustrated. (Like asking Mrs. 80 mph a mathematical question.) If they are rather intelligent, you might get a more in-depth conversation, but then you run the risk of talking with a close-minded elitist, and that's just as frustrating as the previous example because you're still just talking at a wall. Or in the latter case, the wall is prattling off a few facts and heavy opinions on how everybody else is wrong for not agreeing with them and you can't get a reply in or try to steer the conversation to more interesting territories.
Some times you'll luck out and get somebody (smart, dumb, or average) who's got a great personality, open to both a little learning and a little teaching, and likely has a sense of humor. I have had very satisfying conversations before with old farmers talking about bean sprouts, food, and the weather, and also some satisfying quick exchanges of 2-3 sentences with strangers at the store when browsing for the same item.
I know most of you actually enjoy small talk a bit, I've seen lots of little chit chat around here.
But it's interesting chit chat! Most of our banter doesn't end at "oh, that's nice" or "not for me", and thankfully it doesn't go into a ten-page essay per reply (like how this first post is turning out to be) unless it's worth it like with some of the more serious discussions. In ratio to time spent on other forums, I've started a lot more threads here than elsewhere because even the chatter is interesting.
Anywho, who all finds small talk either too boring and predictable to engage in, or perhaps needing to go just a few clicks deeper to be worth engaging in even if it's still considered small talk?
Obviously, the main dislike for many is that small talk is highly focused on your social skills and socializing tends to not be our strong point. Many find it pointless and useless, and arguably at best its function is to bond with another human being so that they are likely to help you in the future should you need it. That's a given.
So how many of you hate small talk because it's boring and predictable and not worth the spoons to engage in it? Or that it's just way too shallow and needs a bit more depth?
I've noticed on a lot of forums regarding various interests I have, I hesitate to make small talk or start a thread because I already know how it'll pan out and don't want to waste the time to verify it and hope it'll go differently. Say for example, a question of "do you like dogs", you're probably going to have most people say they like dogs, a few who don't and likely due to shedding, chewing, or bad breath, you might get one that's gaga for dogs, and maybe a loony that claims dogs are demon spawn. Same principals in person. If you try to narrow the question about asking about a specific breed, odds are the person you're talking to will nod and smile and say they used to own that breed or their friend does, they may have a mild dislike of it, and if they don't know the breed then they'll just give you a confused smile and stay quiet. That's it. No depth, end of discussion. You could hold a better conversation with one of those Magic 8 Balls.
And that's just your average person. If you talk to a person who is... uh, ahem, "intellectually challenged", you're likely to end up confused or frustrated. (Like asking Mrs. 80 mph a mathematical question.) If they are rather intelligent, you might get a more in-depth conversation, but then you run the risk of talking with a close-minded elitist, and that's just as frustrating as the previous example because you're still just talking at a wall. Or in the latter case, the wall is prattling off a few facts and heavy opinions on how everybody else is wrong for not agreeing with them and you can't get a reply in or try to steer the conversation to more interesting territories.
Some times you'll luck out and get somebody (smart, dumb, or average) who's got a great personality, open to both a little learning and a little teaching, and likely has a sense of humor. I have had very satisfying conversations before with old farmers talking about bean sprouts, food, and the weather, and also some satisfying quick exchanges of 2-3 sentences with strangers at the store when browsing for the same item.
I know most of you actually enjoy small talk a bit, I've seen lots of little chit chat around here.

But it's interesting chit chat! Most of our banter doesn't end at "oh, that's nice" or "not for me", and thankfully it doesn't go into a ten-page essay per reply (like how this first post is turning out to be) unless it's worth it like with some of the more serious discussions. In ratio to time spent on other forums, I've started a lot more threads here than elsewhere because even the chatter is interesting.
Anywho, who all finds small talk either too boring and predictable to engage in, or perhaps needing to go just a few clicks deeper to be worth engaging in even if it's still considered small talk?