Observations for me are the usual. Most all of the same folks who won't believe in evolution at all....will blindly accept how much every living creature has adapted the constantly changing world since forever...the only difference being that adaptation involves no mutations (supposedly). I think that if experimentations went deeper (and without bias as to which camp they believe in), they'd find it's basically the same thing. We either change over time....and I mean, we physically and even chemically change some....or we don't. And if none of us living creatures did so at all....we'd have died out already.
Another thing that seemed more of an actual contradiction: the example he gives in the first few minutes to where he's simply talking about that bug. He mentions the big bang of just "bang...everything exists" but then rather thinks that he is dispelling that belief by claiming that bug could not have evolved....it just had to suddenly exist....but that also means, "bang, here something is, deal with it, that's how it happened." If you want to take on the further thinking of, "well, god took his time creating this living thing and then put it into existence." That's evolving, though. "To come forth gradually into being - to develop," is exactly the definition of the word. So, I have to present this baseline logic and ask.........which does he only believe in.....or is it that he actually believe in both? I think it's possible to absolutely believe in both. I find nothing wrong with it. Because, again, remember that science is nothing but the deep research, study and experimentation of how / what / why things only are. If you attribute any god to being the creator of all existence, it makes no sense to deny all that we can learn and via the only ways possible to learn about how / what / why it works. The further research and study of changes in creation over long periods of time (attributed to anything in creation having the abilities to do so), also doesn't dispel any god creating creatures with said capabilities in the first place. In fact, if anything even remotely touches upon what some would consider blasphemy, I would think it's more in terms of ever once thinking a god couldn't or didn't know how to create all of us with such awesome abilities to evolve / adapt. Isn't is worse to think your god is limited or just came up really short in every design of theirs, compared to the evident and way more obvious understanding that everything on or about this planet probably still has untapped potential and then some..?
Still, I watch and listen to anyone's theories and such. It's all learning, so long as we don't stop asking questions.
