Ha ha! - now this is getting really off thread, but you have just piqued a special interest
Just as peacocks show a ridiculous display of tail feathers to attract interested pea-hens to mate with them in order to achieve genetic success, male humans use similar displays (such as expensive vehicles, watches etc.) to attract mates (not every female responds to this I know so please don't beat me up on that).
For the peacock, the risk is that all the extra plumage will make him slower & more vulnerable to predators, but he has no option if he is to achieve genetic success.
For the human male, the risk is identical (bankruptcy etc), but he can pull it off with good finance options
. The genes don't care about the welfare of the vehicle carrying them.
Spiller - I also value my own worth, my thoughts & deeds (maybe ??)
I just read the OP's blog again to remind myself what the thread's about
- intimidating by forcing confrontation through eye contact - and wondered how this differs from being unable to stop staring into the eyes of someone you care about.. does that person feel intimidated at all? Is there an amount of time you should stare and then look away for a bit?
I've found myself, that when I'm talking to someone it makes them uncomfortable if I stare continuously at them (my natural inclination if I'm interested in what they're saying), so I count how long they look at me and look away on average and imitate that.
Our little aside still touches on the original subject, I think, (I say that cos I can't leave this alone, I'm fascinated too) in that, according to several books I've read on successful dating techniques and my own observations, the man should mimic the posture of the woman, making prolonged eye contact, etc, all to show interest, though all of this including conversation and personality, is only about 50% of the 'game', the rest being appearance, bearing and status.
All this makes me feel 'prickly'.. uncomfortable. When I look at someone, I see a person - the color of their skin, sex, height, weight, are all secondary and relatively unimportant to me. If someone must judge me by appearance first before who I am, I fail to understand why they get upset if I turn out to be less than honest as time goes by.. this method of selecting a partner is therefore surely flawed from the start.
I understand the advantage of finding a partner who can contribute/provide/is strong/capable, etc, but a term of friendship can determine these things far more adequately than a false display.. once the peacock's passed on his genes and then been killed by the next passing predator, all he's succeeded in doing is to perpetuate an illogical system.. natures fast food restaurant, maybe..
The young guy is going to carry the habit of living in debt into later life and be completely vulnerable, along with his partner, to the whims of government, economy and unscrupulous types.. I personally value my independence from 'the system' - I can maintain my own car, I'm renovating the boat I live on, I can clean up my own laptop, I'm not materialistic.. basically I'm not really vulnerable to those people who're in a position to rip me off.
This seems only sensible to me.
Does the "Maybe ??" indicate that you find self-worth hard to maintain?
I do, I have to work at it constantly, lest I start to doubt myself, consider myself 'less' than others - I've lived a life like that and have decided I don't want it to continue now!
I'm much happier for that realisation and my life is steadily improving.