I am going to post some of my film reviews in this thread.

[Metalhead]

If the Nosferatu is the 1922 film, I vote for it.

It is the 2024 version.

 

[Kalinychta]

It is the 2024 version.

Boooo

 

[Kalinychta]

It is the 2024 version.

Will you take requests? Such as the 1922 actual real Nosferatu, which is exquisite as it is,—any and all “remakes” (??!!!!!!) are superfluous and almost apocalyptic in terms of Film-with-a-capital-F.

I’ve really enjoyed your film reviews, as a matter of fact. You reviewed The Asphalt Jungle upon my request once, and it was rather excellent. Film used to be an art form. Can’t we make requests? I have a few.

Edit:
Actually your review of The Asphalt Jungle was excellent but ought to have been longer and more thorough. You have great writing skills as a reviewer. I took a writing class once where the professor made we the students write what were more or less film and music reviews, and I was horrendous at it, and miserable. You actually understand it and are good at it. Have you taken courses in film studies? Is there a community college in your town? I think you’d get a lot out of a film studies class.

 

[Kalinychta]

Yo, I haven’t forgotten about this. Nosferatu 1922…

 

[Metalhead]

Yo, I haven’t forgotten about this. Nosferatu 1922…

I loved Nosferatu 2024, actually. Robert Eggers has a genuine talent for crafting atmospheric films. I also loved Werner Herzog's 1980 version, as well.

I will tackle this soon. I have been fighting a lack of motivation to write much of anything, probably related to clinical depression.

 

[Kalinychta]

A friend of mine watched the new movie and also the Werner Herzog one, and she liked both of them. What did you like about the new one? How did it compare to the 1980 version?

I just love 1920s horror films. The Germans totally had the market cornered on movies in general during that period. Metroplis, The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari, Pandora’s Box… So many great silent films.

I hope you’re feeling better. The worst thing you can do when you’re depressed is to not do stuff that makes you happy. Can you write a review of the 2024 Nosferatu?

 

[Kalinychta]

As once Lord Byron annoyed Mary Shelley into writing Frankenstein, so too will I keep on you about the Nosferatu review. Or any review, about any film. But preferably one that I assign you,—because. But any movie you’d like really.

 

[Metalhead]

As once Lord Byron annoyed Mary Shelley into writing Frankenstein, so too will I keep on you about the Nosferatu review. Or any review, about any film. But preferably one that I assign you,—because. But any movie you’d like really.

I know I need to get over my current depression and I know I need to start writing again.

 

[Metalhead]

Soundtrack to a Coup d’Etat (2024)

Grade – 4.5 / 5

Rating – Unrated (equivalent to a PG-13)

Running Time – 150 Minutes​

The assassination of Patrice Lumumba is one relatively recent historical atrocity that somehow does not get discussed in public American high school history classes. Belgium wanted to maintain control over the mines in the country, while POTUS Eisenhower wanted to keep access to the uranium that came out of those mines. Lumumba was seen as a threat to that, and because of that, he was murdered in a not-so-subtle CIA coup.

Soundtrack to a Coup d’Etat is a rightfully outraged documentary of this atrocity, told with a backdrop of wonderful jazz tunes from the likes of Dizzy Gillespie, Louis Armstrong, Nina Simone and Thelonious Monk. These jazz legends were sent as ambassadors by the powers that be as a distraction and an unwitting smokescreen from the coup in the Congo that the CIA was pulling off in Congo during the December of 1960. To say they were not too pleased about it is an understatement.

This is not a straightforward documentary, but it is a jazz melody of home movies, audio clips, news clips, text quotes, a cast of many characters, and the ever present musical soundtrack. The subject matter is dense enough to justify the running time of 150 minutes, and I would have willingly sat through another 150 minutes of this provided it were able to keep up its momentum for that long. The editing here is truly top-notch, despite a couple of tonal missteps. There is a kinetic energy on display here that is sorely missing from most historical documentaries of this type. This feels more freewheeling and experimental, more organic and more genuinely alive than the norm for this cinematic genre.

Director Johan Grimonprez has proven himself to be a documentary maker to watch with this project that followed through on its immense ambition. It is angry without devolving into pure vitriol, it is tragic without descending into misery pornography, and it is informative and enlightening in ways that most documentaries do not dare to attempt. Remember, this is the kind of history half of my country wants to keep out of the public’s knowledge, therefore this remains one of the most vital and essential watches released in American cinemas in the last year.

 

[Metalhead]

The Shrouds (2024)

Grade – 5 / 5

Rating – R

Running Time – 119 Minutes​

David Cronenberg has made yet another body horror masterpiece with The Shrouds, in his way of dealing with the very real body horror that terminal cancer causes on its victims. This is a very personal meditation on grief and the search for reasonings when a disease takes away a loved one. The central character, Karsh (Vincent Cassel), dives into a world of conspiracy theories instead of accepting his wife’s death, but he’s only prolonging his spiritual pain in a variety of different ways.

Karsh has a business model where he operates a graveyard with video screens that allow mourners to watch the bodies of their loved ones decay in real time. Of course, his wife is buried there, and he does not impress his date when he takes her to visit his wife’s grave and look at her corpse. His sister-in-law, Terry (Diane Kruger, who also plays his dead wife, and also does the voice of his AI assistant), has a variety of different theories surrounding why her sister had to die. Terry’s ex-husband, Maury (Guy Pearce), is certifiably insane, but he may be of some use to Karsh after the graveyard is extensively vandalized.

Add in a blind woman who also is craving intimacy when a partner becomes so ill that sex becomes impossible – Sandrine Holt gives a standout performance as the character of Soo-Min. The Shrouds eventually becomes a cautionary tale about the transgressions people are capable of when they turn towards any kind of escapism instead of simply accepting that grief is a normal part of the human condition. Nothing here is done for mere shock value, unlike many of Cronenberg’s past films.

Most of the plot is driven by dialogue, and what entertaining dialogue it is. The endless detours into escapist theories give the film a darkly humorous edge, but none of it brings anybody here any closer to inner peace. The point of this film is not the path to closure, but it is the avoidance of closure that is the central theme here. This is one of the most insightful films of the last decade to explore sides of the human condition that most filmmakers would dare not to touch.

 

[Lemon Zing]

There hasn't been any horror movies that have really grabbed my attention for a while. Half the time they are relatively boring. I end up just giving up.

I do generally enjoy purchasing them, but the one big issue is that rarer ones obviously cost more. Then there's the risk of the cases being damaged. Keep in mind too, that some suppliers are sending them to your address from a factory that is overseas.

Another problem is that some couriers are idiots. Like I was meant to receive a FedEx delivery not too long ago. Some fool made out I signed for it, but they weren't being honest. It's just a total joke.

If you can, I think you'll be better off just streaming films. Prime usually has enough popular stuff, as well as decent indie stuff you may find is a good watch. Some movies can be quite mundane, unfortunately, so be sure to look up the score system on the likes of Rotten Tomatoes or IMDb.