Feeling isolated? You're not alone.
Join 20,000+ people who understand exactly how your day went. Whether you're newly diagnosed, self-identified, or supporting someone you love – this is a space where you don't have to explain yourself.
Join the Conversation → It's free, anonymous, and supportive.
As a member, you'll get:
You've found your people. Create your free account
We don't leave room for hundreds of still living species - I'd rather put that budget into saving their homes. Also, regarding mammoths in particular, it may be a situation like Horses vs Zebras. They look similar, but the Zebra can't be domesticated. Mammoths look like elephants, but they may kill hominids on sight.How do you feel about scientists trying to bring back extinct animals like the mammoth and the dodo? Do you think it'll actually work?
Tasmanian farmers aren't going to be too happy about the return of the thylacine, it's an incredibly efficient large predator, the marsupial equivalent of a large cat. Sheep will form part of their diet along with many other domestic animals, but this time around no one will dare shoot one.They look similar, but the Zebra can't be domesticated. Mammoths look like elephants, but they may kill hominids on sight.
Thylacines seem like an ideal candidate for this.How I feel depends on what animals they're talking about and the reasons behind why they want to do such a thing. The Australian Government and many interested parties have thrown a lot of money behind the de-extinction of the Tasmanian Thylacine because it was a very important part of maintaining balance in that ecosystem but early white farmers didn't like them and hunted them to extinction.
It's going to take them a lot of years and a lot more money but I believe it can be done. Other people must also believe or they wouldn't be throwing money behind it.
Thylacine Integrated Genomic Restoration Research Lab | TIGRR LAB
Yes, they have enough to keep experimenting for quite a few years yet.Do they have enough DNA to reliably recreate the entire genome at some point?
Their nearest relative is a Dunnart, a small shrew like creature. Another near relative is the Tasmanian Devil, about the size of a house cat. The aim is to genetically modify and fertilise dunnart ovum and to use tassy devils as surrogate mothers. The resulting offspring will need to be hand raised by humans and introduced to the wild when they have enough numbers to support each other.And/or is there anything still extant that's fairly close to them?
Yep, all that part is done now. They're just waiting on additional funding to start trying to actually manipulate the genes in real embryos instead of just running computer simulations.Do they know how much "gene editing" will be needed for them to "hijack" Dunnart DNA?
I think if it is an animal that humanity has forced extinct in the last 1-2000 years sure. Things that went extinct like the mammoths due to natural circumstances like the end of an ice age, no. Nature took it's proper course with the mammoth, we did kill out the dodo so bring it back. But only bring it back if we have natural habitat for it. We don't want to start introducing things into the wrong ecosystems and just end up causing more harm than good.How do you feel about scientists trying to bring back extinct animals like the mammoth and the dodo? Do you think it'll actually work?
The last Thylacine died in a zoo in 1936, and many museums around Australia kept specimens which is how we ended up with large quantities of still viable DNA.I think if it is an animal that humanity has forced extinct in the last 1-2000 years sure.