A common thing for aspies (and people with ASD in general) is said to be that there's a problem in dealing with change. Change stresses us out, makes us go out of our comfort zone and probably a bit more.
Just now, I've been thinking if this is actually true. Is the concept of change the problem, or is it actually more important to see WHAT changes, to see if this works for any of us? And maybe even see how much changes at any given moment.
Personally; I've seen things change in the past and I wasn't really against it. I felt that change might be good. However, there's stuff that changed and I didn't like.
Myself, I don't get stressed out that much by change, as long as it's gradually, up to the point where I can easily go along with out without too much of an effort. The change doesn't affect me personally at the moment and thus I barely notice things are changing. It makes me sound lazy, but I always felt there's only so much one can do in terms of stepping out of the comfort zone. If I have to, metaphorically speaking, pack my bags on go on a trip, instead of just stepping out, that's a really, really big stretch. The big problem nowadays is, that a lot of stuff that changes, takes up full 180's all the time. Even NT people have a problem in dealing with that extreme amount of change quite often.
Also; and this is something that comes in account. I remember back when I got into hobby X I liked it as in "ok" thing. Then... as all commercial products do, they go in some kind of "improvement" thing and thus the landscape changes of how the product is marketed. I didn't mind it. It went from ok to awesome. It sustained the "awesome" a bit and after a while it went back to ok again. Now looking in retrospect, I can pretty much visualize a graph to pinpoint good changes, and as such "what I liked about it". I'm quite sure that I can do that with some sense, I don't feel that change is the problem here. I think there's a deeper layer of change. What changed, how did it change, why did it change.
I also wonder; is it change we "fear" or is it progress we're afraid of? If it's change, then make progress in changing stuff up... could it be that some people just look through the concept of change and see no progress and therefore don't like it? (it actually sounds more like the changes governments make all the time, which annoy me)
I don't know if the title for the thread is really an accurate represenation for the thread... it's probably for lack of a better title.
So anyone can make something out my ramblings and add in a thought here or there?
Just now, I've been thinking if this is actually true. Is the concept of change the problem, or is it actually more important to see WHAT changes, to see if this works for any of us? And maybe even see how much changes at any given moment.
Personally; I've seen things change in the past and I wasn't really against it. I felt that change might be good. However, there's stuff that changed and I didn't like.
Myself, I don't get stressed out that much by change, as long as it's gradually, up to the point where I can easily go along with out without too much of an effort. The change doesn't affect me personally at the moment and thus I barely notice things are changing. It makes me sound lazy, but I always felt there's only so much one can do in terms of stepping out of the comfort zone. If I have to, metaphorically speaking, pack my bags on go on a trip, instead of just stepping out, that's a really, really big stretch. The big problem nowadays is, that a lot of stuff that changes, takes up full 180's all the time. Even NT people have a problem in dealing with that extreme amount of change quite often.
Also; and this is something that comes in account. I remember back when I got into hobby X I liked it as in "ok" thing. Then... as all commercial products do, they go in some kind of "improvement" thing and thus the landscape changes of how the product is marketed. I didn't mind it. It went from ok to awesome. It sustained the "awesome" a bit and after a while it went back to ok again. Now looking in retrospect, I can pretty much visualize a graph to pinpoint good changes, and as such "what I liked about it". I'm quite sure that I can do that with some sense, I don't feel that change is the problem here. I think there's a deeper layer of change. What changed, how did it change, why did it change.
I also wonder; is it change we "fear" or is it progress we're afraid of? If it's change, then make progress in changing stuff up... could it be that some people just look through the concept of change and see no progress and therefore don't like it? (it actually sounds more like the changes governments make all the time, which annoy me)
I don't know if the title for the thread is really an accurate represenation for the thread... it's probably for lack of a better title.
So anyone can make something out my ramblings and add in a thought here or there?