Welcome to Autism Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Aspergers Syndrome, Autism, High Functioning Autism and related conditions.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon! Please also check us out @ https://www.twitter.com/aspiescentral
Depends on the problem.keep on thriving brothers and sisters we will all make it inshaAllah (God willing)
View attachment 146998
Mazes are easy. In-laws... Ugh.All about getting through mazes, still doing it even after retiring.
If they ever outlaw marriage, only outlaws will have in-laws...!Mazes are easy. In-laws... Ugh.
Many are easier if you solve them backwards.I had to do a lot of mazes on paper when in hospital as part of my recovery quite easy traced it out in my mind then used pen or pencil, took a few minutes to go through a stack. Still had it real life mazes more fun need to do lots of research.
Same, but with checklists and productivity numbers. (Some people benefit from low producitivity though, such as managers who want to be able to make bad reviews to keep down the competition, rather than help the company financially.) Some people are willing to be ignorant.I can solve technical problems, but am quite unable to get people to admit that there is a better way, even with working models.
It turns out that the people with the power don't want better ways for people to meet their needs. They make more money with pollution, inefficiency, dependency, illness, and violence.Same, but with checklists and productivity numbers. (Some people benefit from low producitivity though, such as managers who want to be able to make bad reviews to keep down the competition, rather than help the company financially.) Some people are willing to be ignorant.
I can solve technical problems, but am quite unable to get people to admit that there is a better way, even with working models.
Yeah, capitalism is promoted as a way to ensure better value through competition, but the competition has been replaced by collusion. Just as one example, back in the dark days of DOS and only basic word processors, I had a one-floppy program called Grammatik that would check spelling, and also check context for to, too, and two, etc. It would flag any disagreement in tenses, and much more. It even had suggestions on style, which I used about half the time. Now, we are supposed to pay by the page, while losing any confidentiality.How true. Especially in these times when it's all about "repeat customers".![]()