Following along the thread here...
I was ambushed by an authoritative answer to my hesitant question about the possibility of being aspie. This site and my personal writings have been the exclusive support I've had while I've come to terms with it. I've said it before and it merits being said again: I am grateful every day this site exists.
I never believed the "NT world" gets up in the morning with the intent to make life miserable. But that statement misses the point. Lack of intent does not mean lack of damage.
If you watch social interactions, the people who don't belong are marginalized. If I were to rewrite some of the words about "we're the minority" using any other minority group, especially those that can be distinguished
on sight, some of these posts would read quite differently. If I were to reread some of the history about how minorities become recognized as people, a lot of the claims of "NT bashing" actually becomes an education in how much it hurts aspies to "fake it until we make it" when we are never going to make it.
An aspie personal history is
likely a history of cutting ourselves in a desperate attempt to fit in and not be marginalized, let alone bullied, to say nothing about being attacked and killed, often by family members. See that
Loud Hands introduction again where this is explicitly documented with names, ages, dates, and killers by name and relationship.
Some of the worst pain was finding out how close I personally came to being a name in the
Loud Hands introduction...in the "all others" endnote. That's not about the diagnosis. That's about finding out that nothing I did was ever going to succeed as long as the attitude persisted that being who I was and am is
my fault alone. And yet,
a person is a person through other people. This was the concept that opposed apartheid. I have problems with it. But I find that I can't really argue against it.
What emerges for me is my belief that
none of us, wherever we are on the spectrum, like knowing that we hurt people without meaning to.
And I don't think any of us enjoys hurting someone even if that's what it takes to make them stop hurting someone else.
Imagine what it feels like to be social, to care about others and find oneself in relationship with others, to be something called "allistic," and to come hear and learn, in the only place you're ever likely to learn, just how much people like you do hurt people
and you had no idea, ever. You just thought the people you didn't like were arrogant, insolent, rude, selfish, etc., etc. and it was safe to marginalize them because "almost everyone" also thought they were odd, difficult, etc.
Now imagine what it's like to find a kind of acceptance, a sociability, on your own terms, for the first time. To actually have
more than one person that you like to talk to. I find that here, and I hope others do. It's what makes it safe to attempt to re-engage with people not like me. The support base is deep enough.
The impersonality of aspie behaviors keeps getting lost in the conversation. NTs are not impersonal in this way. Therein lies the problem, as I see it.
If my friendliness has to look like your friendliness, if we can't find a way to reciprocate without having to be the same, the bridge will never get built. Seems to me as if this is the only place I've ever been where the ratio NT-to-Aspie reverses the ratio in the outside world.
That makes this a very educational experience for the NT. If they are willing to be educated. It's already a very educational experience for the aspie.
The word "education" comes from a root that means "to come out of." Visiting this site is an education for anyone of any brain wiring. What you get out of it is like what you put into it. Checking in aggression, presumption, presupposition (that's a really bad one, because it's usually innocent), you may get an education from a people you already know to be sensitive.
Sensitive does not mean weak or powerless. As we know. And merely articulating a point of view is not bashing. It's when the knife-words come out that we have to start paying attention. This week's winners--"some people" followed up by the perennially popular "you"--are flags that things are starting to get personal, and that a thread is starting to be unsafe.
EDIT: Add to that roll call the behavior of naming names and drawing others into it.
I will state flat out I didn't feel safe posting here yesterday, and if I hadn't seen such commitment by the group to maintaining civility and boundaries, I wouldn't have felt safe posting this either.
Props to Tia Maria, who hung in there, and actually answered Christopher's question, and to all those who honored the deep discussion. I feel humbled in such company.
--
A4H