• Feeling isolated? You're not alone.

    Join 20,000+ people who understand exactly how your day went. Whether you're newly diagnosed, self-identified, or supporting someone you love – this is a space where you don't have to explain yourself.

    Join the Conversation → It's free, anonymous, and supportive.

    As a member, you'll get:

    • A community that actually gets it – no judgment, no explanations needed
    • Private forums for sensitive topics (hidden from search engines)
    • Real-time chat with others who share your experiences
    • Your own blog to document your journey

    You've found your people. Create your free account

Answer a QUESTION with a QUESTION

Can't we consider the possibility that playful creative thinking may be productive?
 
Does your question mean, that once again, researchers should
subject a population to intense study to derive a conclusive result?
 
Can't we just draw our own conclusions rather than relying on so called expert researchers to do our thinking for us? (I've lost count of the number of times I've heard news reports similar to "An international team of researchers have discovered after 10 years of study that people have noses on their faces")
 
Last edited:
Who can work up a power point, showing the difference
between identification techniques?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

New Threads

Top Bottom