The same effect is obviously true over a person's lifetime. Younger people work towards objectives which they may not be satisfied with later in life.
It looks to me that this text:
is a "stated preference" which includes people who have made some "endgame" choices impossible, and are wisely looking at the positive aspects of their current lives. But the "revealed state" isn't so simple:
Respectfully disagree with the seeming underlying emphasis/premise.
It appears to me to be a little ambiguous, with a hint of "Devil's Advocacy".
What might seem to be the better ending might actually not be the case.
Take into consideration that most ppl have been brainwashed into adopting a social paradigm on how best to live their life.
We can't speak for everyone, but I can speak for myself:
Had I attempted to do what was socially expected of me, by finding a SO and starting a family, there is no question in my mind that I absolutely wouldn't have had the time to invest in my personal development as much as I have, and the entire "enterprise" would have ended in disaster.
Hail self-actualisation instead!
I was a total wreck for half my life.
I am now a functioning, independent, self-aware, financially secure individual who has managed to change the disaster of my younger life, which was full of suicidal thoughts and profound total despair, into something positive.
I am hardly breeding material, but have the wisdom now to realise the folly in that unenlightened direction.
I sound more than a little biased.
But: "I really don't care."

I have found my own, personal path in this unregulated cacophony of nonsense.
It is good to have my ontological security back again.
My caffeine has spoken.
P.S.
I see the beginnings of an epic can of worms, and may refuse to be drawn further into the direction of this particular discussion.
