• Feeling isolated? You're not alone.

    Join 20,000+ people who understand exactly how your day went. Whether you're newly diagnosed, self-identified, or supporting someone you love – this is a space where you don't have to explain yourself.

    Join the Conversation → It's free, anonymous, and supportive.

    As a member, you'll get:

    • A community that actually gets it – no judgment, no explanations needed
    • Private forums for sensitive topics (hidden from search engines)
    • Real-time chat with others who share your experiences
    • Your own blog to document your journey

    You've found your people. Create your free account

Truth Vs Comfort

Jonn said:
What you have posted (#36) has nothing to do with the water poisoning comment.
Click to expand...
Your wording "murder through starvation was less conspicuous" implied the starvation as a preferred alternative to the poisoning in the allies mind. I saw the whole section as a context to the allies plans.
 
UFO said:
Your wording "murder through starvation was less conspicuous" implied the starvation as a preferred alternative to the poisoning in the allies mind. I saw the whole section as a context to the allies plans.
Click to expand...
This discussion has been taken to DM...:cool:
 
UFO said:
Your wording "murder through starvation was less conspicuous" implied the starvation as a preferred alternative to the poisoning in the allies mind. I saw the whole section as a context to the allies plans.
Click to expand...
As I edited earlier:
I never said it was part of the allied plan.
It would have caused massive repercussions.
 
Ok. There was an ambiguous presentation by you that followed a misunderstanding by me. Nuremberg poisoning plan and starvation policy were meant to be a separate examples of concept "retribution from whatever direction", not from the allies plan. Got it. No further issues.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

New Threads

Top Bottom