IMO it's a poorly designed test.
Some of the questions are ok, but far too many are not. Very poorly balanced.
It might be real anyway ... but it
looks like someone has collected questions from other tests without understanding how to use them, or even understanding anything about ASD.
Try this: would that test accurately distinguish between "chatty Aspies" and those who have to work quite hard to communicate well?
(
@Outdated and I have both "admitted" to being articulate and talkative IRL /lol - but we're not the only ones here by any means).
They were asking "unmasked" questions (it was obvious what each one was looking for - the only "test-like" characteristic was the use of multiples of the same thing with different wording).
But given that the test is so transparent, why not more questions about expression and body language? Poor at sports" is a very poor substitute for that - huge chance of false positives.
Also FWIW I don't think it would as well for F Aspies as for M Aspies. Hard to be sure since I'm only one of them, but the data that M & F present ASD differently is solid. You'd expect to see a pattern in the questions designed to accommodate that, or two different tests. But either approach would make it even harder to create a good test.