Over-analyzing things

[tyko berglund]

I have a tendency to over-analyze things, including the titles of things.

1) Was there a Monkey Ball before Super Monkey Ball?
2) If they got rid of the panelist interviews on Jeopardy, they wouldn't run out of time as often
3) Why didn't Canada buy Alaska?
4) There might be things which exist that cannot be seen, felt, tasted, heard, or smelled.

Boy, am I weird.

I thought observation number 4 four above was most probable, as I think of, for example,
other dimensions not yet discovered. I would offer that there may be advanced highly
intelligent beings resident in other dimensions, "doors" to which we may not currently be
able to enter. I would offer this as "food for further thought".

 

[Kupu2]

Have you ever sat and pondered what was here before the universe began? If you say, "Nothing," that's fine; but, isn't nothing just another human construct? Nothing is the absence of something. You can't have nothing without something. What does nothing look like? It can't be light and it can't be dark. Those are both something. So, what exactly is nothing in this most cosmic sense?

Now, that's over analyzing.

No way! Heard of Schroedinger's cat dilemma? I'm sure Einstein spent many a moment, daydreaming about the flick of a match. Over analysing is sprouted by those who have not the dedication and/or interest. Over analyse all you like, people.