ancusmitis
Well-Known Member
It's important to understand that ASD is not totally, or even partially, the inability to communicate. That's because communication is a skill, which can be developed like any other. Of course, like with any skill, many people lack a natural aptitude for it, but just like not every NT is suitable for a career in communications, not every autistic is unsuitable for it.Some jobs just need people with good communication skills. People with autism don't have good communication skills as by definition our communication is impaired. So it just makes sense that certain jobs just won't hire us.
In our media, most autistic traits tend to get ignored. That's because, let's face it, stimming and intense interest in academic subjects just aren't as scary, so organizations like Auti$m $peak$ are not going to popularize them. And while stimming can get exploited as a visual symbol of mental vacancy, the real "proof" of inhumanity is lack of speech. The idea of a person existing behind a nonverbal exterior is more than just contrary to expectations, it's actually bad for fundraising. And a person who is stimming who can speak could potentially explain what's going on in their mind, which is even worse for aut$queaks's bottom line.
It's true that qualitative impairments in socialization and forming age-appropriate relationships are an important part of autism, but they have never been limited to a lack of communication.
And lack of communication or impairment of it is not now, and has never been, sufficient for an autism diagnosis. And while many people can learn to compensate, which makes later diagnosis difficult, those people have always been autistic and never stopped being so.
I'm not saying we should base all our hopes for the future on employability. But discarding qualified candidates for a job just because of a diagnostic label is wrong.