Oh Chris, you mean 'Mathemusic'? That's awesome :shifty: .
I've been doing mathematics as well (plus theoretical physics): differential geometry, especially manifold embedding as well as constructing new non-Euclidean geometries for the unification of physical forces (this is where the novel part is). I'm one big mess of a mind, and so luckily, to me, mathematics and art are not oppositional things; rather they subconsciously surge and fill the most creative aspect of me, following (or actually sujercitvely shaping) the common contour of my mind and soul.
Even in mathematics, the mind without the (movement of the) soul, in the form of passion and new images, is simply a static machine, incapable of creation, and the soul without the mind is dull and blind, incapable of profound objectivity. So there's always space for creative (logical) subjectivity, such as in art. For instance, things of geometry, topology, and algebra are not less profound than a surreal painting. (Unfortunately, mental illness (psychosis) often follows behind, lol.)
Einstein's General Theory of Relativity, for example, has been one of the most beautiful theories of the physical Universe ever constructed by the human mind. I really mean it's artistically elegant (it's actually the marriage of elegant mathematics (Riemannian geometry) and profound, spontaneous, 'structureless', penetrating intuition, that of Genius). As known, the holy grail of physics would be the eventual unification of General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. This desired ***** is called Quantum Gravity, which will definitely erase the obscure big-bang origin of the Universe. Although many people are collectively doing it now in the University setting, a linear mathematical-physical mind might not be able to come up with a profoundly elegant version of it. It takes some insanity and highly authentic individuality ('autism'). An artistic one.
The fact is that the most original of mathematicians have been geometers and number theorists, supported by musical zeal and a parallel interest in abstraction and painting. This is reminiscent of the popular question, "What is the Shape of Sound?"---you can even construct a physical-mathematical theory of the Universe based on self-referential noise (that noise is essentially taken as pre-geometry, or that the Universe began with it.)
So don't worry, it's not impossible at all for you, a gifted musician and a mathematical young mind for the future; in a Pomeranian way, open your eyes unto themselves, and see their two deep landscapes: mathematics and art. That's definitely a profound meeting between the Earth and the Sea. (Though more often, it's mathematics and physical science that are coupled to each other.)
Nowadays, I speak a lot of philosophy (and religion) because, compared to mathematics, it's an idle thing to do, and so it's easily recreational. I'm having a major break from mathematics now (refusing to think the way I used to more than 2 hours per day), to rest my mind for further creativity to emerge. But I doubt I can ever repeat my original mathematical period again. Most mathematicians take it for granted that they're past it once they reach the age of 27. Sure, there's still some time before 27, but yeah, that can be very depressing for anyone desiring to come up with totally original ideas.
While aspergically young, go for the signaled hills! :showoff:
Good post, Evar. Again. :lol:
Sometimes I think if I could just break out of my mechanical/mathematical mindset for a few hours at a time, things would be great. I'm not entirely convinced its impossible. I think I'm like this since I've always had an interest from maths from such a young age... if I had been interested in art, surely I would have developed more of an organic or 'creative' mindset? Maybe if I play guitar or piano long enough with no particular aim or direction, I may start to wander into the realms of creativity. It just takes longer for me than everyone else or something I guess....